Computational Mechanics

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 621–630 | Cite as

A finite strain framework for the simulation of polymer curing. Part I: elasticity

Original Paper

Abstract

A phenomenologically motivated small strain model to simulate the curing of thermosets has been developed and discussed in a recently published paper (Hossain et al. in Comput Mech 43(6):769–779, 2009). Inspired by the concepts used there, this follow-up contribution presents an extension towards the finite strain regime. The thermodynamically consistent framework proposed here for the simulation of curing polymers particularly is independent of the choice of the free energy density, i.e. any phenomenological or micromechanical approach can be utilised. Both the governing equations for the curing simulation framework and the necessary details for the numerical implementation within the finite element method are derived. The curing of polymers is a very complex process involving a series of chemical reactions typically resulting in a conversion of low molecular weight monomer solutions into more or less cross-linked solid macromolecular structures. A material undergoing such a transition can be modelled by using an appropriate constitutive relation that is distinguished by prescribed temporal evolutions of its governing material parameters, which have to be determined experimentally. Part I of this work will deal with the elastic framework whereas the following Part II will focus on viscoelastic behaviour and shrinkage effects. Some numerical examples demonstrate the capability of our approach to correctly reproduce the behaviour of curing materials.

Keywords

Curing Polymer Finite strains Elasticity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lion A, Höfer P (2007) On the phenomenological representation of curing phenomena in contiuum mechanics. Arch Mech 59: 59–89MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adolf DB, Chambers RS (2007) A thermodynamically consistent, nonlinear viscoelastic approach for modeling thermosets during cure. J Rheol 51: 23–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kiasat M (2000) Curing shrinkage and residual stresses in viscoelastic thermosetting resins and composites. Ph.D. Thesis, TU Delft, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van ’t Hof C (2006) Mechanical characterization and modeling of curing thermosets. Ph.D. Thesis, TU Delft, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hossain M, Possart G, Steinmann P (2009) A small-strain model to simulate the curing of thermosets. Comput Mech 43(6): 769–779MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Adolf DB, Martin JE (1996) Calculation of stresses in crosslinking polymers. J Compos Mater 30: 13–34Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Adolf DB, Chambers RS (1997) Verification of the capability for quantitative stress prediction during epoxy cure. Polymer 38: 5481–5490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Adolf DB, Martin JE, Chambers RS, Burchett SN, Guess TR (1998) Stresses during thermoset cure. J Mater Res 13: 530–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adolf DB, Chambers RS, Caruthers JM (2004) Extensive validation of a thermodynamically consistent, nonlinear viscoelastic model for glassy polymers. Polymer 45: 4599–4621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haupt P, Lion A (2002) On finite linear viscoelasticity of incompressible isotropic materials. Acta Mech 159: 87–124MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lion A (1998) Thixotropic behaviour of rubber under dynamic loading histories: experiments and theories. J Mech Phys Solids 46: 895–930MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lion A (1997) On the large deformation behaviour of reinforced rubber at different temperatures. J Mech Phys Solids 45: 1805–1834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Retka J, Höfer P (2007) Numerische Simulation aushärtender Klebstoffe. Diploma Thesis, Universität der Bundeswehr MünchenGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Truesdell C, Noll W (1992) The non-linear field theories of mechanics. Springer, BerlinMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bonet J, Wood RD (1997) Nonlinear continuum mechanics for finite element analysis. Cambridge University Press, LondonMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wriggers P (2008) Nonlinear finite element methods. Springer, BerlinMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boyce MC, Arruda EM (2000) Constitutive models of rubber elasticity: a review. Rubber Chem Technol 73: 504–523Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marckmann G, Verron E (2006) Comparison of hyperelastic models for rubber-like materials. Rubber Chemistry Technol 79: 835–858Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miehe C, Göktepe S, Lulei F (2004) A micro-macro approach to rubber-like materials: Part-I. The non-affine micro-sphere model of rubber elasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 52: 2617–2660MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lulei F (2002) Mikromechanisch motivierte Modelle zur Beschreibung finiter Deformationen gummiartiger Polymere: Physikalische Modellbildung und Numerische Simulation. Ph.D. Thesis, Institut für Mechanik (Bauwesen), University of StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Göktepe S (2007) Micro-macro approaches to rubbery and glassy polymers: Predictive micromechanically-based models and simulations. Ph.D. Thesis, Institüt für Mechanik (Bauwesen), University of StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kuhn W, Grün F (1942) Beziehungen zwischen elastischen Konstanten und Dehnungsdoppelbrechung hochelastischer Stoffe. Kolloid-Zeitschrift 101: 248–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bažant ZP, Oh BH (1986) Efficient numerical integration on the surface of a sphere. Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik Mechanik 66: 37–49MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ruiz E, Trochu F (2005) Thermomechanical properties during cure of glass-polyester RTM composites: elastic and viscoelastic modeling. J Compos Mater 39: 881–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lange J (1999) Viscoelastic properties and transitions during thermal and UV cure of a methacrylate resin. Polym Eng Sci 39: 1651–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dal H, Kaliske M (2009) A micro-continuum-mechanical material model for failure of rubber-like materials: application to ageing induced fracturing. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.007

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations