Computational Mechanics

, Volume 43, Issue 6, pp 769–779 | Cite as

A small-strain model to simulate the curing of thermosets

Original Paper

Abstract

This contribution presents a newly developed phenomenological model to describe the curing process of thermosets undergoing small strain deformations. The governing equations are derived from a number of physical and chemical presuppositions and details of the numerical implementation within the finite element method are given. The curing of thermosets is a very complex process involving a series of chemical reactions which result in the conversion of liquid low molecular weight monomer mixtures into highly cross-linked solid macromolecular structures. This phase transition from a viscous fluid to a viscoelastic solid can be modelled by a constitutive relation which is based on a temporal evolution of shear modulus and relaxation time. Some numerical examples demonstrate the capability of the model to correctly represent the evolution of elastic and inelastic material properties as well as the volume shrinkage taking place during the curing process.

Keywords

Curing Thermosets Viscoelasticity Stiffness increase Volume shrinkage 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hubert P, Johnston A, Poursartip A, Nelson K (2001) Cure kinetics and viscosity models for Hexcel 8552 epoxy resin. In: Proceedings of the 46th international SAMPE symposium. Long Beach, CA, pp 2341–2354Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lion A, Höfer P (2007) On the phenomenological representation of curing phenomena in contiuum mechanics. Arch Mech 59: 59–89Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kiasat M (2000) Curing shrinkage and residual stresses in viscoelastic thermosetting resins and composites. PhD Thesis, TU Delft, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ruiz E, Trochu F (2005) Thermomechanical properties during cure of glass-polyester RTM composites: elastic and viscoelastic modeling. J Compos Mater 39: 881–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ernst LJ, van’t Hof C, Yang DG, Kiasat M, Zhang GQ, Bressers HJL, Caers JFJ, den Boer AWJ, Janssen J (2002) Mechanical modeling and characterization of the curing process of underfill materials. J Electron Packag 124: 97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’Brien DJ, Mather PT, White SR (2001) Viscoelastic properties of an epoxy resin during cure. J Compos Mater 35: 883–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lange J (1999) Viscoelastic properties and transitions during thermal and UV cure of a methacrylate resin. Polym Eng Sci 39: 1651–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eom Y, Boogh L, Michaud V, Sunderland P, Manson JA (2000) Time-cure-temperature superposition for the prediction of instantaneous viscoelastic properties during cure. Polym Eng Sci 40: 1281–1292Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suzuki K, Miyano Y (1977) Change of viscoelastic properties of epoxy resin in the curing process. J Appl Polym Sci 21: 3367–3379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Matsuoka S, Quan X, Bair HE, Boyle DJ (1989) A model for the curing reaction of epoxy resins. Macromolecules 22: 4093–4098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    White SR, Hahn HT (1992) Process modeling of composite materials: residual stress development during cure. Part I. Model formulation. J Compos Mater 26: 2402–2422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Antonucci V, Cusano A, Giordano M, Nasser J, Nicolais L (2006) Cure-induced residual strain build-up in a thermoset resin. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 37: 592–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen Y, Xia Z, Ellyin F (2001) Evolution of residual stresses induced during curing processing using a viscoelastic micromechanical model. J Compos Mater 36: 522–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adolf DB, Chambers RS (2007) A thermodynamically consistent, nonlinear viscoelastic approach for modeling thermosets during cure. J Rheol 51: 23–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hojjati M, Johnston A, Hoa SV, Denault J (2004) Viscoelastic behaviour of Cytec FM73 adhesive during cure. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 2548–2557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim YK, White SR (1996) Stress relaxation behaviour of 3501-6 epoxy resin during cure. Polym Eng Sci 36: 2852–2862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thomas R, Durix S, Sinturel C, Omonov T, Goossens S, Groeninckx G, Moldenaers P, Thomas S (2007) Cure kinetics, morphology and miscibility of modified DGEBA-based epoxy resin - effects of a liquid rubber inclusion. Polymer 48: 1695–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Han HG, Kim WG, Yoon HG, Moon TJ (1998) Curing reaction of biphenyl epoxy resin with different phenolic functional hardeners. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 36: 773–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Karkanas PI, Partridge IK (1996) Modelling the cure of a commercial epoxy resin for applications in resin transfer moulding. Polym Int 41: 183–191Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    van’t Hof C (2006) Mechanical characterization and modeling of curing thermosets. PhD Thesis, TU Delft, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Adolf DB, Martin JE (1996) Calculation of stresses in crosslinking polymers. J Compos Mater 30: 13–34Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Adolf DB, Chambers RS (1997) Verification of the capability for quantitative stress prediction during epoxy cure. Polymer 38: 5481–5490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Adolf DB, Martin JE, Chambers RS, Burchett SN, Guess TR (1998) Stresses during thermoset cure. J Mater Res 13: 530–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Adolf DB, Chambers RS, Caruthers JM (2004) Extensive validation of a thermodynamically consistent, nonlinear viscoelastic model for glassy polymers. Polymer 45: 4599–4621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haupt P, Lion A (2002) On finite linear viscoelasticity of incompressible isotropic materials. Acta Mech 159: 87–124MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lion A (1998) Thixotropic behaviour of rubber under dynamic loading histories: experiments and theories. J Mech Phys Solids 46: 895–930MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lion A (1997) On the large deformation behaviour of reinforced rubber at different temperatures. J Mech Phys Solids 45: 1805–1834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gillen KT (1988) Effect of cross-links which occur during continuous chemical stress-relaxation. Macromolecules 21: 442–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Simo JC, Hughes TJR (1998) Computational inelasticity. Springer, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hill RR, Muzumdar SV, Lee LJ (1995) Analysis of volumetric changes of unsaturated polyester resins during curing. Polym Eng Sci 35: 852–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Simon SL, McKenna GB, Sindt O (2000) Modeling the evolution of the dynamic mechanical properties of a commercial epoxy resin during cure after gelation. J Appl Polym Sci 76: 495–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Applied MechanicsUniversity of KaiserslauternKaiserslauternGermany
  2. 2.Chair of Applied MechanicsUniversity of Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations