Advertisement

Computational Mechanics

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 261–279 | Cite as

A new high-order accurate continuous Galerkin method for linear elastodynamics problems

  • Alexander V. IdesmanEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

A new high-order accurate time-continuous Galerkin (TCG) method for elastodynamics is suggested. The accuracy of the new implicit TCG method is increased by a factor of two in comparison to that of the standard TCG method and is one order higher than the accuracy of the standard time-discontinuous Galerkin (TDG) method at the same number of degrees of freedom. The new method is unconditionally stable and has controllable numerical dissipation at high frequencies. An iterative predictor/multi-corrector solver that includes the factorization of the effective mass matrix of the same dimension as that of the mass matrix for the second-order methods is developed for the new TCG method. A new strategy combining numerical methods with small and large numerical dissipation is developed for elastodynamics. Simple numerical tests show a significant reduction in the computation time (by 5–25 times) for the new TCG method in comparison to that for second-order methods, and the suppression of spurious high-frequency oscillations.

Keywords

Spectral Radius Time Increment Direct Solver Numerical Dissipation Elastodynamics Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bonelli A, Bursi OS (2001) Explicit predictor-multicorrector time discontinuous galerkin methods for linear dynamics. J Sound Vib 246(4):625–652CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonelli A, Bursi OS (2003) Iterative solutions for implicit time discontinuous galerkin methods applied to non-linear elastodynamics. Comput Mech 30(5-6):487–498zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cannarozzi M, Mancuso M (1995) Formulation and analysis of variational methods for time integration of linear elastodynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 127(1-4):241– 257zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chien CC, Wu TY (2000) Improved predictor/multi-corrector algorithm for a time-discontinuous galerkin finite element method in structural dynamics. Comput Mech 25(5):430– 437zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chien CC, Yang CS, Tang TH (2003) Three-dimensional transient elastodynamic analysis by a space and time-discontinuous galerkin finite element method. Finite Elem Anal Des 39(7):561–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fung TC (2005) Construction of higher-order accurate time-step integration algorithms by equal-order polynomial projection. J Vib Control 11(1):19–49zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hilber HM, Hughes TJR (1978) Collocation, dissipation and ‘overshoot’ for time integration schemes in structural dynamics. Earthquake Engrg Struct Dyn (6):99–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hilber HM, Hughes TJR, Taylor RL (1977) Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn (5):283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Houbolt JC (1950) A recurrence matrix solution for the dynamic response of elastic aircraft. J Aeronaut Sci (17):540– 550MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hughes TJR (1987) The finite element method: linear static and dynamic finite element analysis. Prentice- Hall, Englewood CliffszbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hughes TJR, Hulbert GM (1988) Space-time finite element methods for elastodynamics: Formulations and error estimates. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 66(3):339–363zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hulbert GM (1992) Discontinuity-capturing operators for elastodynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 96(3):409–426zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hulbert GM (1992) Time finite element methods for structural dynamics. Inter J Numer Methods Eng 33(2):307–331zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hulbert GM (1994) A unified set of a single-step asymptotic annihilation algorithms for structural dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 113:1–9zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hulbert GM, Hughes TJR (1990) Space-time finite element methods for second-order hyperbolic equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 84(3):327–348zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim SJ, Cho JY, Kim WD (1997) From the trapezoidal rule to higher-order accurate and unconditionally stable time-integration method for structural dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 149(1-4):73–88zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kunthong P, Thompson LL (2005) An efficient solver for the high-order accurate time-discontinuous galerkin (tdg) method for second-order hyperbolic systems. Finite Elem Anal Des 41(7-8):729–762CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li XD, Wiberg NE (1996) Structural dynamic analysis by a time-discontinuous galerkin finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 39(12):2131–2152zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li XD, Wiberg NE (1998) Implementation and adaptivity of a space-time finite element method for structural dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 156:211–229zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mancuso M, Ubertini F (2003) An efficient integration procedure for linear dynamics based on a time discontinuous galerkin formulation. Comput Mech 32(3):154–168zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mancuso M, Ubertini F (2003) A methodology for the generation of low-cost higher-order methods for linear dynamics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 56(13):1883–1912zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Newmark NM (1959) A method of computation for structural dynamics. J Eng Mech Div ASCE 85:67–94Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Park KC (1975) Evaluating time integration methods for nonlinear dynamic analysis. In: Belytschko T et al. (ed) Finite element analysis of transient nonlinear behavior, AMD 14. ASME, New York, pp 35–58Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thompson LL, He D (2005) Adaptive space-time finite element methods for the wave equation on unbounded domains. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194(18-20):1947–2000zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wiberg NE, Li XD (1999) Adaptive finite element procedures for linear and non-linear dynamics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 46(10):1781–1802zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wilson EL, Farhoomand I, Bathe KJ (1973) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of complex structures. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn (1):242–252Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL (2000) The finite element method. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford UKzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zienkiewicz OC, Wood WL, Hines NW, Taylor RL (1984) Unified set of single step algorithms - part i: General formulation and applications. Int J Numer Methods Eng 20(8): 1529–1552zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA

Personalised recommendations