Computational Mechanics

, Volume 39, Issue 6, pp 859–877

A Smoothed Finite Element Method for Mechanics Problems

Original Paper

Abstract

In the finite element method (FEM), a necessary condition for a four-node isoparametric element is that no interior angle is greater than 180° and the positivity of Jacobian determinant should be ensured in numerical implementation. In this paper, we incorporate cell-wise strain smoothing operations into conventional finite elements and propose the smoothed finite element method (SFEM) for 2D elastic problems. It is found that a quadrilateral element divided into four smoothing cells can avoid spurious modes and gives stable results for integration over the element. Compared with original FEM, the SFEM achieves more accurate results and generally higher convergence rate in energy without increasing computational cost. More importantly, as no mapping or coordinate transformation is involved in the SFEM, its element is allowed to be of arbitrary shape. Hence the restriction on the shape bilinear isoparametric elements can be removed and problem domain can be discretized in more flexible ways, as demonstrated in the example problems.

Keywords

Finite element method (FEM) Smoothed finite element method (SFEM) Strain smoothing Isoparametric element Gauss quadrature 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bathe KJ (1996) Finite element procedures. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beissel S, Belytschko T (1996) Nodal integration of the element - free Galerkin method. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 139:49–74MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belytschko T, Lu YY, Gu L (1994) Element-free Galerkin methods. Int J Numer Method Eng 37:229–256MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Belytschko T, Krongauz Y, Organ D, Fleming M, Krysl P (1996) Meshless Method: An Overview and Recent Developments. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 139:3–47MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bonet J, Kulasegaram S (1999) Correction and stabilization of smooth particle hydrodynamics methods with applications in metal forming simulation. Int J Numer Method Eng 47:1189–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen JS, Wu CT, Belytschko T (2000) Regularization of material instabilities by meshfree approximations with intrinsic length scales. Int J Numer Method Eng 47:1303–1322MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen JS, Wu CT, Yoon S, You Y (2001) A stabilized conforming nodal integration for Galerkin meshfree method. Int J Numer Method Eng 50:435–466MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dai KY, Liu GR, Lim KM, Gu YT (2003) Comparison between the radial point interpolation and the Kriging based interpolation used in mesh-free methods. Comput Mech 32:60–70MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krongauz Y, Belytschko T (1997) Consistent pseudo-derivatives in meshless method. Int J Numer Method Eng 146:371–386MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li Y, Liu GR, Luan MT, Dai KY, Zhong ZH, Li GY, Han X (2006) Contact analysis for solids based on linearly conforming RPIM. Comput Mech (in press)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu GR (2002) Mesh-free methods: moving beyond the finite element method. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu GR, Li Y, Dai KY, Luan MT, Xue W (2006a) A linearly conforming RPIM for 2D solid mechanics. Int J Comput Methods (in press)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu GR, Quek SS (2003) The finite element method: a practical course. Butterworth Heinemann, OxfordMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu GR, Zhang GY, Dai KY, Wang YY, Zhong ZH, Li G, Han X (2006b) A linearly conforming point interpolation method (LC-PIM) for 2D solid mechanics problems. Int J Comput Methods (in press)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu WK, Jun S, Zhang YF (1995) Reproducing kernel particle methods. Int J Numer Method Eng 20:1081–1106MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Monaghan JJ (1982) Why particle methods work. Siam J Sci Sat Comput 3(4):423–433MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sukumar N (2004) Construction of polygonal interpolants: a maximum entropy approach. Int J Numer Method Eng 61:2159–2181MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sukumar N, Moran B (1999) C 1 natural neighbor interpolation for partial differential equations. Numer Methods Partial Differential Equations 15:417MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sukumar N, Moran B, Belytschko T (1998) The natural element method in solid mechanics. Int J Numer Method Eng 43:839–887MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sukumar N, Tabarraei (2004) Conforming polygonal finite elements. Int J Numer Method Eng 61:2045–2066MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Timoshenko SP, Goodier JN (1970) Theory of elasticity, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang JG, Liu GR (2002) A point interpolation meshless method based on radial basis functions. Int J Numer Method Eng 54:1623–1648MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yoo JW, Moran B, Chen JS (2004) Stabilized conforming nodal integration in the natural-element method. Int J Numer Method Eng 60:861–890MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL (2000) The finite element method, 5th edn. Butterworth Heinemann, OxfordMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Advanced Computations in Engineering Science (ACES), Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Singapore-MIT Alliance (SMA)SingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations