Computational Mechanics

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 183–199 | Cite as

Wave propagation in the presence of empty cracks in an elastic medium



This paper proposes the use of a traction boundary element method (TBEM) to evaluate 3D wave propagation in unbounded elastic media containing cracks whose geometry does not change along one direction. The proposed formulation is developed in the frequency domain and handles the thin-body difficulty presented by the classical boundary element method (BEM). The empty crack may have any geometry and orientation and may even exhibit null thickness. Implementing this model yields hypersingular integrals, which are evaluated here analytically, thereby surmounting one of the drawbacks of this formulation. The TBEM formulation enables the crack to be modelled as a single line, allowing the computation of displacement jumps in the opposing sides of the crack. Furthermore, if this formulation is combined with the classical BEM formulation the displacements in the opposing sides of the crack can be computed by modelling the crack as a closed empty thin body.


Wave propagation Elastic scattering Empty cracks Boundary element method Traction boundary element method Two-and-a-half-dimensional problem 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Aliabadi MH (1997) Boundary element methods formulations in fracture mechanics. Appl Mech Rev 50:93–96MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aliabadi MH (1997) A new generation of boundary element methods in fracture mechanics. Int J Fracture 86:91–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    António J, Tadeu A (2002) 3D Seismic response of a limited valley via BEM using 2.5D analytical green’s functions for an infinite free-rigid layer. J Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 22:659–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bouchon M, Aki K (1977) Discrete wave-number representation of seismic-source wave field. Bull Seism Soc Am 67:259–277Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Budreck DE, Achenbach JD (1988) Scattering from three-dimensional planar cracks by the boundary integral equation method. J Appl Mech 55:405–412MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burton AJ, Miller GF (1971) The application of the integral equation method to the numerical solution of some exterior boundary value problems. Proc R Soc London Ser A 323:201–210MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chien CC, Rajiyah H, Atluri SN (1990) An effective method for solving the hypersingular integral equations in 3D acoustics. J Acoustic Soc Am 88(2):918–937CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cruse TA (1987) Boundary Element Analysis in Computational Fracture Mechanics. Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cruse TA, Richardson JD (1996) Nonsingular somigliana stress identities in elasticity. Int J Numer Meth Eng 39:3273–3304CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dell’erba DN, Aliabadi MH, Rooke DP (1998) Dual boundary element method for three-dimensional thermoelastic crack problems. Int J Fracture 94:89–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dominguez J, Gallego R (1992) Time domain boundary element method for dynamic stress intensity factor computations. Int J Numer Meth Eng 33:635–647CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dominguez J, Ariza MP, Gallego R (2000) Flux and traction boundary elements without hypersingular or strongly singular integrals. Int J Numer Meth Eng 48:111–135MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fedelinski P, Aliabadi MH, Rooke DP (1994) The dual boundary element method: Ĵ-integral for dynamic stress intensity factors. Int J Fracture 65(4):369–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fedelinski P, Aliabadi MH, Rooke DP (1995) A sinlge-region time domain BEM for dynamic crack problems. Int J Solids Struct 32:3555–3571CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fedelinski P, Aliabadi MH, Rooke DP (1996) The Laplace transform DBEM for mixed-mode dynamic crack analysis. Comp Struct 59:1021–1031CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fedelinski P, Aliabadi MH, Rooke DP (1996) Boundary element formulations for the dynamic analysis of cracked structures. EABE – Eng Anal Bound Elem 17:45–56Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guiggiani M (1998) Formulation and numerical treatment of boundary integral equations with hypersingular kernels. Singular Integrals in Boundary Element Methods, Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton (UK) & Boston (USA)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kausel E, Roesset JM (1992) Frequency domain analysis of undamped systems. J Eng Mech ASCE 118(4):721–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lutz E, Ingraffea AR, Gray LJ (1992) Use of ‘simple solutions’ for boundary integral methods in elasticity and fracture analysis. Int J Numer Meth Eng 35:1737–1751CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Manolis GD, Beskos DE (1988) Boundary Element Methods in Elastodynamics. Unwin Hyman (sold to Chapman and Hall), LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mi Y, Aliabadi MH (1992) Dual boundary element method for three-dimensional fracture mechanics analysis. EABE – Eng Anal Bound Elem 10:161–171Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pao YH, Mow CC (1973) Diffraction of Elastic Waves and Dynamic Stress Concentrations. Crane and RussakGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Partridge PE, Brebbia CA, Wrobel LC (1992) The Dual Reciprocity Boundary Element Methods. CMP, SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Portela A, Aliabadi MH, Rooke DP (1992) The dual boundary element method: effective implementation for crack problems. Int J Numer Meth Eng 33:1269–1287CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Prosper D, Kausel E (2001) Wave scattering by cracks in laminated media. In: Atluri SN, Nishioka T, Kikuchi M (eds), CD: Advances in Computational Engineering and Sciences. Proceedings of the international Conference on Computational Engineering and Science ICES’01, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico,19-25/08/2001. Tech Science PressGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Prosper D (2001) Modeling and Detection of Delaminations in Laminated Plates. PhD Thesis, MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pyl L, Clouteau D, Degrande G (2004) A weakly singular boundary integral equation inelastodynamics for heterogeneous domains mitigating ficticious eigenfrequencies. EABE – Eng Anal Bound Elem 28(12):1493–1513Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Qian ZY, Han ZD, Ufimtsev P, Atluri SN (2004) Non-hyper-singular boundary integral equations for acoustic problems, implemented by the collocation-based boundary element method. CMES – Comput Model Eng 6(2):133–144Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rudolphi TJ (1991) The use of simple solutions in the regularisation of hypersingular boundary integral equations. Math Comp Model 15:269–278CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sladek V, Sladek J (1984) Transient elastodynamic three- dimensional problems in cracked bodies. Appl Math Model 8:2–10CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sládek V, Sládek J (1987) A boundary integral equation method for dynamic crack problems. Eng Fracture Mech 27(3):269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sladek V, Sladek J, Tanaka M (1992) Numerical solution of nonsingular BIE for crack problems. In: Brebbia CA, Domínguez J, Paris F (eds) Boundary Elements XIV. vol. 2, Computational Mechanics Publications, SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sladek J, Sladek V (2000) Nonsingular traction BIEs for crack problems in elastodynamics. Comput Mech 25:590–599CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stamos AA, Beskos DE (1996) 3-D seismic response analysis of long lined tunnels in half-space. J Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 15:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tadeu AJB (1992) Modelling and Seismic Imaging of Buried Structures. PhD Thesis, MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tadeu A, Santos P, Kausel E (1999) Closed-form Integration of Singular Terms for Constant, Linear and Quadratic Boundary Elements - Part I: SH Wave Propagation. EABE – Eng Anal Bound Elem 23(8):671–681Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tadeu A, Santos P, Kausel E (1999) Closed-form Integration of Singular Terms for Constant, Linear and Quadratic Boundary Elements - Part II: SV-P Wave Propagation. EABE – Eng Anal Bound Elem 23(9):757–768Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tadeu A, Kausel E (2000) Green’s Functions for Two-and-a-half Dimensional Elastodynamic Problems. J Eng Mech, ASCE 126(10):1093–1097Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tadeu A, Godinho L, Santos P (2001) Performance of the BEM solution in 3D acoustic wave scattering. J Adv Eng Software 32:629–639CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tadeu A, António J, Kausel E (2002) 3D Scattering of waves by a cylindrical irregular cavity of infinite length in a homogeneous elastic medium. Comp Method Appl Mech Eng 191(27–28): 3015–3033Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Takakuda K (1983) Diffraction of plane harmonic waves by cracks. JSME 26(214): 487–493MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tanaka M, Sladek V, Sladek J (1994) Regularization techniques applied to boundary element methods. Appl Mech Rev 47:457–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Watson JO (1995) Singular boundary elements for the analysis of cracks in plane strain. Int J Numer Meth Eng 38:2389–2411CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wu TW, Seybert AF, Wan GC (1991) On the numerical implementation of a Cauchy principal value integral to insure a unique solution for acoustic radiation and scattering. J Acoust Soc Am 90:554–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yan ZY, Hung KC, Zheng H (2003) Solving the hypersingular boundary integral equation in three-dimensional acoustics using a regularization relationship. J Acoust Soc Am 113(5):2674–2683CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Young A (1992) A single-domain boundary element method for 3-D elastostatic crack analysis using continuous elements. Int J Numer Meth Eng 39:1265–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of Coimbra Pólo II – Pinhal de MarrocosCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations