Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 91–92 | Cite as

The impact of technologies on minimally invasive therapy

  • A. Cuschieri
  • A. Melzer


  1. 1.
    Wickham J. Editorial. Min Invas Ther & Allied Tech 1996: 1Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cuschieri A, Buess G. Nature and scope of endoscopic surgery. In: Operative Manual of Endoscopic Surgery, Cuschieri A, Buess G, Perissat J ( eds) 1992; Springer: Berlin, pp 9–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cuschieri A, Crosthwaite G, Shimi S, Pietrabissa, Joypaul V, Tait I, Naziri W. Hepatic cryotherapy for liver tumours: development and clinical evaluation of a high-efficiency multineedle probe system for open and laparoscopic use. Surg Endosc 1995: 483–489Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buess G. IEM or what shall we call it? Min Invas Ther & Allied Tech 1996: 1Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buess G. Why this journal? End Surg 1993: 1–2Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Seibel R. Image guided minimal invasive therapy. Surg Endosc 1997: 154–162Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Melzer A, Schurr MO, Kunert W, Buess G. Intelligent surgical instrument system. Concept and preliminary experimental application of components and prototypes. End Surg 1993: 165–170Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Satava R, Simon LB. Teleoperation, telerobotics, and telepresence surgery. End Surg 1993: 151–153Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schurr MO, Melzer A, Kunert W, Dautzenberg P, Neisius B, Bretwieser W, Buess G. Experimental evaluation of components of an endoscopic manipulator system Artemis. October 1989, SMIT 6th International Meeting, BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Cuschieri
    • 1
  • A. Melzer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryNinewalls Hospital and Medical SchoolDundeeUK
  2. 2.University Witten/HeidedreMulheimGermany

Personalised recommendations