Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 27–31 | Cite as

Laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer

Is it superior to open surgery?
  • S. Shimizu
  • A. Uchiyama
  • K. Mizumoto
  • T. Morisaki
  • K. Nakamura
  • H. Shimura
  • M. Tanaka
Original Articles

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between laparoscopically assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Methods

The records of 21 patients who underwent laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy (LG) for preoperative diagnosis of intramucosal gastric carcinoma between January 1996 and August 1998 were reviewed and compared with those of 31 open distal gastrectomy patients during the same period.

Results

Age, gender, and size and histologic differentiation of the lesions were matched. Those located at the body of the stomach (p=0.011) and those macroscopically depressed (p=0.049) were subjected more frequently to open surgery. Laparoscopically assisted gastrectomy required significantly longer operative time (p<0.001) with less extensive lymph node dissection (p<0.001). However, time to start of walking (p=0.032), time to flatus (p=0.002), duration of postoperative fever (p=0.027), and postoperative hospital stay (p=0.001) were significantly shorter in the LG group, and this group had a lower white blood cell count on the first postoperative day (p=0.010). Blood loss and time to oral intake were comparable between the groups. Complications included one conversion to open surgery, one leakage, and one stenosis in the LG group, and two leakages and an atelectasis in the OG group.

Conclusions

Although LG requires longer surgical time, this retrospective study suggests that it is superior to open surgery in terms of faster postoperative recoveries, shorter hospital stays, and cosmetic outcomes.

Key words

Early gastric cancer Gastrectomy Laparoscopy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Akahoshi K, Chijiiwa Y, Sasaki I, Hamada S, Iwakiri Y, Nawata H, Kabemura T (1997) Preoperative TN staging of gastric cancer using a 15-MHz ultrasound miniprobe. Br J Radiol 70: 703–707PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anvari M, Park A (1994) Laparoscopic-assisted vagotomy and distal gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 8: 1312–1315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bohm B, Milsom JW, Fazio VW (1995) Postoperative intestinal motility following conventional and laparoscopic intestinal surgery. Arch Surg 130: 415–419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bonenkamp JJ, Songun I, Hermans J, Sasako M, Welvaart K, Plukker JTM, van Elk P, Obertop H, Gouma DJ, Taat CW, van Lanschot J, Meyer S, de Graaf PW, von Meyenfeldt MF, Tilanus H, van de Velde CJH (1995) Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients. Lancet 345: 745–748PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dubois F, Icard P, Berthelot G, Levard H (1990) Coelioscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary report of 36 cases. Ann Surg 211: 60–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fowler DL, White SA (1996) Laparoscopic gastrectomy: five cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6: 98–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Okeson GC, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW (1991) Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison of postoperative pulmonary function. Ann Surg 213: 651–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Friedman RL, Hiatt JR, Korman JL, Facklis K, Cymerman J, Phillips EH (1997) Laparoscopic or open splenectomy for hematologic disease: which approach is superior? J Am Coll Surg 1985: 49–54Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Furutomi H, Sakita T (1984) Analysis of early gastric cancer cases collected from major hospitals and institutes in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 14: 169–179Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Glasgow RE, Yee LF, Mulvihill SJ (1997) Laparoscopic splenectomy: the emerging standard. Surg Endosc 11: 108–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goh P, Tekant Y, Isaac J, Kum CK, Ngoi SS (1992) The technique of laparoscopic Billroth II gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 2: 258–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hasson HM (1978) Open laparoscopy vs closed laparoscopy: a comparison of complication rates. Adv Planned Parenthood 13: 41–50Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hotokezaka M, Combs MJ, Schirmer BD (1996) Recovery of gastrointestinal motility following open versus laparoscopic colon resection in dogs. Dig Dis Sci 41: 705–710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iriyama K, Asakawa T, Koike H, Nishiwaki H, Suzuki H (1989) Is extensive lymphadenectomy necessary for surgical treatment of intramucosal carcinoma of the stomach? Arch Surg 124: 309–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (1981) The general rules for the gastric cancer study in surgery and pathology. Jpn J Surg 11: 127–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kitano S, Yasunori I, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K (1994) Laparoscope-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4: 146–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kitaoka H, Yoshikawa K, Hirota T, Itabashi M (1984) Surgical treatment of early gastric cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 14: 283–293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Korenaga D, Haraguchi M, Tsujitani S, Okamura T, Tamada R, Sugimachi K (1986) Clinicopathological features of mucosal carcinoma of the stomach with lymph node metastasis in eleven patients. Br J Surg 73: 431–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McIntyre RC, Zoeter MA, Weil KC, Cohen MM (1992) A comparison of outcome and cost of open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 2: 143–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nagai Y, Tanimura H, Takifuji K, Kashiwagi H, Yamoto H, Nakatani Y (1995) Laparoscope-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5: 281–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ohashi S (1995) Laparoscopic intraluminal (intragastric) surgery for early gastric cancer: a new concept in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 9: 169–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ohgami M, Kumai K, Otani Y, Wakabayashi G, Kubota T, Kitajima M (1994) Laparoscopic wedge resection of the stomach for early gastric cancer using a lesion-lifting method. Dig Surg 11: 64–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peters JH, Ellison EC, Innes JT, Liss JL, Nichols KE, Lomano JM, Roby SR, Front ME, Carey LC (1991) Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg 213: 3–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schippers E, Öttinger AP, Anurov M, Polivoda M, Schumpelick V (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a minor abdominal trauma? World J Surg 17: 539–543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA, Mackeigan JM, Mazier WP (1993) Open colectomy versus laparoscopic colectomy: are there differences? Am Surg 59: 549–554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Takekoshi T, Baba Y, Ota H, Kato Y, Yanagisawa A, Takagi K, Noguchi Y (1994) Endoscopic resection of early gastric carcinoma: results of a retrospective analysis of 308 cases. Endoscopy 26: 352–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yanai H, Matsumoto Y, Harada T, Nishiaki M, Tokiyama H, Shigemitsu T, Tada M, Okita K (1997) Endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopy for staging depth of invasion in early gastric cancer: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 46: 212–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Shimizu
    • 1
  • A. Uchiyama
    • 1
  • K. Mizumoto
    • 1
  • T. Morisaki
    • 1
  • K. Nakamura
    • 1
  • H. Shimura
    • 2
  • M. Tanaka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery 1Kyushu University Faculty of MedicineFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Surgery 1Fukuoka University Faculty of MedicineFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations