Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 15, Issue 9, pp 972–975 | Cite as

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair

A 7-year two-center experience in 3017 patients
  • S. A. Kapiris
  • W. A. Brough
  • C. M. S. Royston
  • C. O’Boyle
  • P. C. Sedman
Original Articles

Abstract

Background

This report reviews our experience with 3530 transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repairs in 3017 patients (513 bilateral) over the 7-year period from May 1992 to July 1999. We have continually audited our practice and modified the techniques in response.

Methods

Unless contraindicated, laparoscopic TAPP repair is considered the procedure of choice at our institution for all reducible inguinal hernias. We initially stapled an 11×6 cm polypropylene mesh in the preperitoneal space but now place a 15×10 cm mesh in the preperitoneal space with sutured peritoneal closure.

Results

There have been a total of 22 recurrences, of which 17 were identified in the first 325 repairs (5%) using the 11 × 6 cm mesh. Five recurrences occurred in the later 3205 repairs (0.16%) (median follow up of 45 months). There was one 30-day death unrelated to the procedure. There have been seven conversions (four due to irreducibility, two due to extensive adhesions, one due to bleeding). Bladder perforations have occurred in seven cases, of which six were recognized immediately and treated laparoscopically without sequelae. There have been seven cases of small bowel obstruction from herniation through the peritoneal closure. Sutured repair of the peritoneum has reduced the incidence of this complication. Four patients had mesh infections, of whom three were treated conservatively. The incidence of postoperative seroma and hematoma was 8%. Median operation time remains at 40 min with a mean hospitalization of 0.9 nights. Sixty percent of TAPP hernia repairs are now performed on the Day Surgical Unit with a 3% admission rate. Median return to normal activities is 7 days. Forty percent of patients require no postoperative analgesia. These figures remain the same whether the hernia is primary, recurrent, unilateral, or bilateral. Consultants performed most operations early in the series, but latterly surgical trainees have performed the majority of these procedures under supervision.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic TAPP hernia repair is technically difficult, but in the hands of a well-trained surgeon, it is safe and effective with a high degree of patient satisfaction. The low recurrence rate compares favorably to other tension-free mesh hernia repairs.

Key words

Laparoscopy Transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia TAPP repair Hernia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Deans GT, Wilson MS, Royston CMS, Brough WA (1995) Laparoscopic ‘bikini mesh’ repair of bilateral inguinal herniae. Br J Surg 82: 183–185Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deans GT, Wilson MS, Royston CMS, Brough WA (1995) Recurrent inguinal hernia after laparoscopic repair: a possible cause and prevention. Br J Surg 82: 539–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Felix EL, Michas CA, McKnight RL (1994) Laparoscopic repair of recurrent groin hernias. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4: 200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferzli G, Sayad P, Huie F, Hallak A, Usal H (1998) Endoscopic extraperitoneal herniorraphy: a 5-year experience. Surg Endosc 12: 1311–1313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goodwin JS, Traverso LW (1995) A prospective cost and outcome comparison of inguinal hernia repairs: laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal versus open tension-free preperitoneal. Surg Endosc 9: 981–983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (1998) A cost and outcome comparison between laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernia operations in a day-case unit: a randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc 12: 1199–1203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Irving SO, Deans GT, Royston CS, Brough WA (1997) Laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP): a new method to reduce port-site herniation. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7: 49–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Milkins RC, Lansdown MJR, Wedgewood KR, Brough WA, Royston CMS (1993) Laparoscopic hernia repair: a prospective study of 409 cases. Minimally Invasive Therapy 2: 237–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O’Riordain DS, Kelly P, Horgan PG, Keane FBV, Tanner WA (1999) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in the day-case setting. Surg Endosc 13: 914–917PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Phillips EH, Arregui M, Carroll BJ, Crafton WB (1995) Incidence of complications following laparoscopic hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 9: 16–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ramshaw BJ, Tucker JG, Duncan TD, Heithold D, Garcha I, Mason EM, Wilson JP, Lucas GW (1996) Technical considerations of the different approaches to laparoscopic herniorraphy: an analysis of 500 cases. Am Surg 62: 69–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Report of a Working Party [Chaired by A. Kingsnorth] convened by the Royal College of Surgeons of England (1993) Clinical guidelines on the management of groin hernia in adults. Published by Royal College of Surgeons of England (30 pages).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Skandalakis JE, Skandalakis LJ, Colborn GL (1996) Testicular atrophy and neuropathy in hernioraphy. Am Surg 62: 69–72Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith AI, Royston CMS, Sedman PC (1999) Stapled and nonstapled laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 13: 804–806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stark E, Oestreich K, Wendl K, Rumstadt B, Hagmuller E (1999) Nerve irritation after laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc 13: 878–881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tetik C, Arregui ME, Dulucq JL (1994) Complications and recurrences associated with laparoscopic repair of groin hernias: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc 8: 1316–1323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Van Hee R, De Mondt V, Ysebaert D, Van Elst F (1994) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 81: 71 [Abstract]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wellwood J, Sculpher MJ, Stoker D, Nicholls GJ, Geddes C, Whitehead A, Singh R, Spiegelhalter D (1998) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost. Br Med J 317: 103–110Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. A. Kapiris
    • 1
  • W. A. Brough
    • 2
  • C. M. S. Royston
    • 2
  • C. O’Boyle
    • 2
  • P. C. Sedman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryHull Royal InfirmaryHullEngland
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryStepping Hill HospitalStockportEngland

Personalised recommendations