Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 467–472 | Cite as

A balanced approach to choledocholithiasis

  • M. C. Lilly
  • M. E. Arregui
Original Articles

Abstract

Background

We set out to review and evaluate the results of an algorithm for managing choledocholithiasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods

We performed retrospective review of patients with choledocholithiasis at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) between March 1993 and August 1999. All patients were operated on under the direction of one surgeon (M.E.A), following a consistent algorithm that relies primarily on laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (TCCBDE) but uses laparoscopic choledochotomy (LCD) when the duct and stones are large or if the ductal anatomy is suboptimal for TCCBDE. Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy (ERS) is done if sphincterotomy is required to facilitate common bile duct exploration (CBDE). Postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is utilized when this fails. Preoperative ERCP is used only for high-risk patients.

Results

A total of 728 LC were performed, and there were 60 instances (8.2%) of choledocholithiasis. Primary procedures consisted of 47 TCCBDE; 37 of them required no other treatment. In five cases, the stones were flushed with no exploration. Intraoperative ERS was performed three times as the only form of duct exploration. LCD was utilized twice; one case also required intraoperative ERS, and the other had a postoperative ERCP for stent removal. One patient with small stones was observed, with no sequelae. Preoperative ERCP was done twice as the primary procedure. Of the 10 cases that were not completely cleared by TCCBDE, three had a postoperative ERCP and seven had an intraoperative ERS, one of which required a postoperative ERCP. There were three complications (6%) related to CBDE, with no long-term sequelae. There were four postoperative complications (6.7%) and no deaths. The mean number of procedures per patient was 1.12. The average postoperative hospital stay was 1.8 days (range, 0–14).

Conclusions

Choledocholithiasis can be managed safely by laparoscopic techniques, augmenting with ERCP as necessary. This protocol minimizes the number of procedures and decreases the hospital stay.

Key words

Choledocholithiasis Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Gallbladder Common bile duct stones 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arregui ME, Davis CJ, Arkush AM, Nagan RF (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction or laparoscopic choledochoscopy and Electro Hydrolic Lithotripsy for management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 6: 10–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arregui ME, Naverrete JL, Davis CJ, Hammond JC, Barteau J (1994) The evolving role of ERCP and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int Surg 79: 188–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Basso N, Gennaro P, Desdemona S, Materia A, Silecchia G, Fantini A, Fiocca F, Trentino P (1999) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 50: 532–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berthou JC, Douard F, Charbonneau P, Moussalier K (1998) Evaluation of laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones in 220 patients. Surg Endosc 12: 16–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crawford DL, Phillips EH (1999) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. World J Surg 23: 343–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Bafutto M (1994) Laparoscopic management of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 8: 1399–1403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dorman JP, Franklin ME, Glass JL (1998) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy: an effective and efficient method of treatment of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 12: 926–928PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gigot JF, Navez B, Etienne J, Cambier E, Jadoul P, Kestens PJ (1997) A stratified itraoperative surgical strategy is mandatory during laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 11: 722–728PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giurgiu DI, Margulies DR, Carroll BJ, Gabbay J, Iida A, Takagi S, Fallas MJ, Phillips EH (1999) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: long-term outcome. Arch Surg 134: 839–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Graham SM, Flowers JL, Scott TR, Bailey RW, Scovill WA, Zucker KA, Imbembo AL (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct stones. Ann Surg 218: 61–67PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnson AS, Ferrara JJ, Steinberg SM, Gassen GM, Hollier LH, Flint LM (1993) The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: sphincterotomy versus common bile duct exploration as a primary technique in the management of choledocholithiasis. Am Surg 59: 78–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ, Rosenthal R, Hiatt J (1996) Cost-effective management of complicated choledocholithiasis: laparoscopic transcystic duct exploration or endoscopic sphinterotomy. J Am Coll Surg 182: 488–494PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O’Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G (1998) Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 228: 29–34PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meyer C, Le JV, Rohr S, Thiry LC, Duclos B, Reimund JM, Baumann R (1999) Management of common bile duct stones in a single operation combining laparoscopic cholecystectomy and perioperative sphincterotomy. Surg Endosc 13: 874–877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ng T, Amaral JF (1999) Timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of choledocholithiasis. J. Laparendosc Surg 9: 31–37Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paganini AM, Lezoche E (1998) Follow-up of 161 unselected consecutive patients treated laparoscopically for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 12: 23–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Petelin JB (1993) Treatment of choledocholithiasis: laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Am J Surg 165: 487–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Petelin JB (1999) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: transcystic duct approach. In: Scott-Connor CEH (ed) The SAGES manual: fundamentals of laparoscopy and GI endoscopy. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, pp 167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Pearlstein AR, Daykhovsky L, Fallas MJ (1993) Laparoscopic choledochoscopy and extraction of common bile duct stones. World J Surg 17: 22–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thompson DM, Arregui ME, Tetik C, Madden MT, Wegener M (1998) A comparison of laparoscopic ultrasound with digital fluorocholangiography for detecting choledocholithiasis during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 12: 929–932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. C. Lilly
    • 1
  • M. E. Arregui
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General SurgerySt. Vincent Hospital and Health Care CenterIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations