Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 477–483 | Cite as

Hemodynamic and pulmonary changes during open, carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum, and abdominal wall-lifting cholecystectomy

A prospective, randomized study
  • G. Galizia
  • G. Prizio
  • E. Lieto
  • P. Castellano
  • L. Pelosio
  • V. Imperatore
  • A. Ferrara
  • C. Pignatelli
Original Articles

Abstract

Background

Carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum effects are still controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate cardiopulmonary changes in patients subjected to different surgical procedures for cholecystectomy.

Methods

In this study, 15 patients were assigned randomly to three groups according to the surgical procedure to be used: open cholecystectomy (OC), CO2 pneumoperitoneum cholecystectomy (PP), and laparoscopic gasless cholecystectomy (abdominal wall lifting [AWL]), respectively. A pulmonary artery catheter was used for hemodynamic monitoring in all patients. A subcutaneous multiplanar device (Laparo Tenser) was used for abdominal wall lifting. To avoid misinterpretation of results, conventional anesthesia was performed with all parameters, and the position of the patients held fixed thoroughout surgery. The following parameters were analyzed: men arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), central venous pressure (CVP), systemic vascular resistances index (SVRI), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), pulmonary vascular resistances index (PVRI), peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), end-tidal CO2 pressure (ETCO)2, CO2 arterial pressure (PaCO2), and arterial pH.

Results

All the operations were completed successfully. The Laparo Tenser allowed good exposition of the surgical field. A slight impairment of the cardiopulmonary functions, with reduction of SVRI, MAP, and CI and elevation of pulmonary pressures and vascular resistance, followed induction of anesthesia. However, these effects tended to normalize in the OC and AWL groups over time. In contrast, CO2 insufflation produced a complex hemodynamic and pulmonary syndrome resulting in increased right- and left side filling pressures, significant cardiac index reduction, derangement of the respiratory mechanics, and respiratory acidosis. All of these effects normalized after desufflation.

Conclusions

Cardiopulmonary adverse effects of general anesthesia were significant but transitory and normalized during surgery. Carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum caused a significant impairment in cardiopulmonary functions. In high-risk patients, gasless laparoscopy may be preferred for reliability and absence of cardiopulmonary alterations.

Key words

Abdominal wall lifting Cardiopulmonary functions Laparoscopic surgery Laparo Tenser Pneumoperitoneum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Carry PY, Gallet D, Francois Y, Perdrix JP, Sayag A, Gilly F, Eberhard A, Banssillon V, Baconnier P (1998) Respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the effects of the abdominal wall lift. Anesth Analg 87: 1393–1397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cuschieri A (1998) Adverse cardiovascular changes induced by positive pressure pneumoperitoneum: possible solutions to a problem. Surg Endosc 12: 93–94 DOI: 10.1007/s004649900604PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feig BW, Berger DH, Dougherty TB, Dupuis JF, Hsi B, Hickey RC, Ota DM (1994) Pharmacologic intervention can restablish baseline hemodynamic parameters during laparoscopy. Surgery 116: 733–741PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gutt CN, Daume J, Schaeff B, Paolucci V (1997) Systems and instruments for laparoscopic surgery without pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc 11: 868–874 DOI: 10.1007/s004649900474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Horvath KD, Whelan RL, Lier B, Viscomi S, Barry L, Buck K, Bessler M (1998) The effects of elevated intraabdominal pressure, hypercarbia, and positioning on the hemodynamic responses to laparoscopic colectomy in pigs. Surg Endosc 12: 107–114 DOI: 10.1007/s004649900608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kawamura YJ, Sawada T, Sunami E, Saito Y, Watanabe T, Masaki T, Muto T (1999) Gasless laparoscopically assisted colonic surgery. Am J Surg 177: 515–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koivusalo AM, Kellokumpu I, Ristkari S, Lindgren L (1997) Splanchnic and renal deterioration during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison of the carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and the abdominal wall lift method. Anesth Analg 85: 886–891PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mathew G, Watson DI, Ellis TS, Jamieson GG, Rofe AM (1999) The role of peritoneal immunity and the tumor-bearing state on the development of wound and peritoneal metastases after laparoscopy. Aust N Z J Surg 69: 14–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McDermott JP, Regan MC, Page R, Stokes MA, Barry K, Moriarty DC, Caushaj PE, Fitzpatrick JM, Gorey TF (1995) Cardiorespiratory effects of laparoscopy with and without gas insufflation. Arch Surg 130: 984–988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moncure M, Salem R, Moncure K, Testaiuti M, Marburger R, Ye X, Brathwaite C, Ross SE (1999) Central nervous system metabolic and physiologic effects of laparoscopy. Am Surg 65: 168–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ninomiya K, Kitano S, Yoshida T, Bandoh T, Baatar D, Matsumoto T (1998) Comparison of pneumoperitoneum and abdominal wall lifting as to hemodynamics and surgical stress response during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 12: 124–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nishio S, Takeda H, Yokoyama M (1999) Changes in urinary output during laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Brit J Urol 83: 944–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ogihara Y, Isshiki A, Kindscher JD, Goto H (1999) Abdominal wall lifting versus carbon dioxide insufflation for laparoscopic resection of ovarian tumors. J Clin Anesth 11: 406–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ramachandran CS, Arora V (1998) Two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an innovative new method for gallbladder removal. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 8: 303–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sampietro R (1999) Correct use of the gasless Laparo Tenser system. Surg Endosc 13: 316 DOI: 10.1007/s004649900978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schulze S, Lyng KM, Bugge K, Perner A, Bendtsen A, Thorup J, Nielsen HJ, Rasmussen V, Rosenberg J (1999) Cardiovascular and respiratory changes and convalescence in laparoscopic colonic surgery: comparison between carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and gasless laparoscopy. Arch Surg 134: 1112–1118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shoemaker WC, Wo CC, Bishop MH, Thangathurai D, Patil RS (1996) Noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring of critical patients in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 3: 675–681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Takagi S (1998) Hepatic and portal vein blood flow during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic hepatectomy. Surg Endosc 12: 427–431 DOI: 10.1007/s004649900696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vezakis A, Davides D, Gibson JS, Moore MR, Shah H, Larvin M, McMahon MJ (1999) Randomized comparison between low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy and gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 13: 890–893 DOI: 10.1007/s004649901127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Woolley DS, Puglisi RN, Bilgrami S, Quinn JV, Slotman GJ (1995) Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of gasless abdominal distension and CO2 pneumoperitoneum during incremental positive end-expiratory pressure. J Surg Res 58: 75–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Galizia
    • 1
  • G. Prizio
    • 1
  • E. Lieto
    • 1
  • P. Castellano
    • 1
  • L. Pelosio
    • 1
  • V. Imperatore
    • 1
  • A. Ferrara
    • 1
  • C. Pignatelli
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgical Sciences, General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery UnitSecond University of Naples School of MedicineNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations