Advertisement

Effect of laparoscopic liver resection versus the open technique on hepatocyte regenerating activity in the rat

  • Petros YpsilantisEmail author
  • Maria Lambropoulou
  • Konstantinos Anagnostopoulos
  • Eleni Panidou-Tsoulou
  • Orestis Ioannidis
  • Albion Totsi
  • Michael Pitiakoudis
  • Constantinos Simopoulos
Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic liver resection offers a safe and feasible option primarily for the excision of hepatic neoplasms. Timely recovery of liver volume is a key factor for improving prognosis and post-operative mortality of patients undergone liver resection. The aim of the present study was to compare liver regeneration after laparoscopic over open partial hepatectomy.

Methods

Wistar rats were subjected to laparoscopic 70% hepatectomy (group LAP-HEP), open 70% hepatectomy (group HEP), sham operation (group Sham) or no intervention (group Control). At various timepoints following operation (1 h–2 weeks), the liver was excised to assess relative liver weight, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) levels, mitotic activity, tissue expression of Nuclear Factor-κB (NFκB), Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and the histopathologic profile.

Results

No differences were seen in relative liver weight between hepatectomy groups. Mitotic index was increased in all operative study groups, being higher in group LAP-HEP than in group HEP. TBARS levels were higher in group LAP-HEP compared to group HEP. NFκB and VCAM-1 tissue expression scores were increased in all operative study groups with VCAM-1 being higher in group HEP, while ICAM-1 was overexpressed only in hepatectomy groups. Mild histopathologic lesions were noted in hepatectomy groups with the histopathologic score being higher in group HEP (24 h).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic liver resection enhanced hepatocyte mitotic activity which was accompanied by mild oxidative stress and a less pronounced local inflammatory response and tissue injury to that of the open technique.

Keywords

Laparoscopy Hepatectomy Liver Regeneration 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by a Grant of the Special Account for Research Funds of the Democritus University of Thrace (Code No 80216).

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosure

Petros Ypsilantis, Maria Lambropoulou, Konstantinos Anagnostopoulos, Eleni Panidou-Tsoulou, Orestis Ioannidis, Albion Totsi, Michael Pitiakoudis and Constantinos Simopoulos declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Coelho FF, Kruger JA, Fonseca GM, Araújo RL, Jeismann VB, Perini MV, Lupinacci RM, Cecconello I, Herman P (2016) Laparoscopic liver resection: experience based guidelines. World J Gastrointest Surg 8:5–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Richter S, Olinger A, Hildebrandt U, Menger MD, Vollmar B (2001) Loss of physiologic hepatic blood flow control (‘‘hepatic arterial buffer response’’) during CO2 pneumoperitoneum in the rat. Anesth Analg 93:872–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ypsilantis P, Lambropoulou M, Tentes I, Chryssidou M, Georgantas T, Simopoulos C (2016) Room air versus carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum: effects on oxidative state, apoptosis and histology of splanchnic organs. Surg Endosc 30:1388–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Konishi T, Lentsch AB (2017) Hepatic ischemia/reperfusion: mechanisms of tissue injury, repair, and regeneration. Gene Expr 17:277–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ypsilantis P, Lambropoulou M, Tentes I, Anagnostopoulos K, Papadopoulos N, Kortsaris A, Simopoulos C (2008) Impaired liver regeneration following partial hepatectomy using the Pringle maneuver. Protective effect of mesna. J Gastroent Hepatol 24:623–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lock JF, Malinowski M, Seehofer D, Hoppe S, Röhl RI, Niehues SM, Neuhaus P, Stockmann M (2012) Function and volume recovery after partial hepatectomy: influence of preoperative liver function, residual liver volume, and obesity. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397:1297–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schmidt SC, Schumacher G, Klage N, Chopra S, Neuhaus P, Neumann U (2010) The impact of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on liver regeneration after liver resection in a rat model. Surg Endosc 24:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Komori Y, Iwashita Y, Ohta M, Kawano Y, Inomata M, Kitano S (2014) Effects of different pressure levels of CO2 pneumoperitoneum on liver regeneration after liver resection in a rat model. Surg Endosc 28:2466–2473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ypsilantis P, Simopoulos C (2016) A laparoscopic technique of partial hepatectomy in the rat. J Surg Res 205:286–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berguer R, Cornelius T, Dalton M (1997) The optimum pneumoperitoneum pressure for laparoscopic surgery in the rat model. A detailed cardiorespiratory study. Surg Endosc 11:915–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Avital S, Itah R, Szomstein S, Rosenthal R, Inbar R, Sckornik Y, Weinbroum A (2009) Correlation of CO2 pneumoperitoneal pressures between rodents and humans. Surg Endosc 23:50–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ypsilantis P, Tentes I, Anagnostopoulos K, Kortsaris A, Simopoulos C (2009) Mesna protects splanchnic organs from oxidative stress induced by pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc 23:583–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fausto N (2000) Liver regeneration. J Hepatol 32(1 Suppl.):19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fausto N, Campbell JS, Riehle KJ (2006) Liver regeneration. Hepatology 43(2 Suppl. 1):S45–S53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schietroma M, Carlei F, Franchi L, Mazzotta C, Sozio A, Lygidakis NJ, Amicucci G (2004) A comparison of serum interleukin-6 concentrations in patients treated by cholecystectomy via laparotomy or laparoscopy. Hepatogastroenterology 51:1595–1599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Whitson BA, D’Cunha J, Andrade RS, Kelly RF, Groth SS, Wu B, Miller JS, Kratzke RA, Maddaus MA (2008) Thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy: differential impairment of cellular immunity. Ann Thorac Surg 86:1735–1744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schietroma M, Piccione F, Carlei F, Clementi M, Bianchi Z, de Vita F, Amicucci G (2012) Peritonitis from perforated appendicitis: stress response after laparoscopic or open treatment. Am Surg 78:582–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Veenhof AA, Vlug MS, van der Pas MH, Sietses C, van der Peet DL, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Bonjer HJ, Bemelman WA, Cuesta MA (2012) Surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopy or open surgery with fast track or standard perioperative care: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 255:216–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Burpee SE, Kurian M, Murakame Y, Benevides S, Gagner M (2002) The metabolic and immune response to laparoscopic versus open liver resection. Surg Endosc 16:899–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chopra SS, Haacke N, Meisel C, Unterwalder N, Fikatas P, Schmidt SC (2013) Postoperative immunosuppression after open and laparoscopic liver resection: assessment of cellular immune function and monocytic HLA-DR expression. JSLS 17:615–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fretland AA, Sokolov A, Postriganova N, Kazaryan AM, Pischke SE, Nilsson PH, Rognes IN, Bjornbeth BA, Fagerland MW, Mollnes TE, Edwin B (2015) Inflammatory response after laparoscopic versus open resection of colorectal liver metastases: data from the Oslo-CoMet trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petros Ypsilantis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maria Lambropoulou
    • 2
  • Konstantinos Anagnostopoulos
    • 3
  • Eleni Panidou-Tsoulou
    • 1
  • Orestis Ioannidis
    • 1
  • Albion Totsi
    • 1
  • Michael Pitiakoudis
    • 1
  • Constantinos Simopoulos
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Experimental Research and Surgical Research, School of MedicineDemocritus University of ThraceAlexandroupolisGreece
  2. 2.Laboratory of Histology and Embryology, School of MedicineDemocritus University of ThraceAlexandroupolisGreece
  3. 3.Laboratory of Biochemistry, School of MedicineDemocritus University of ThraceAlexandroupolisGreece

Personalised recommendations