Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a current meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- 76 Downloads
We performed this study to compare the safety and feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) with conventional multiple-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MPLC).
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials comparing SILC versus MPLC. We evaluated the pooled outcomes for complications, pain scores, and surgery-related events. This study was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.
A total of 48 randomized controlled trials involving 2838 patients in the SILC group and 2956 patients in the MPLC group were included in this study. Our results showed that SILC was associated with a higher incidence of incisional hernia (relative risk = 2.51; 95% confidence interval = 1.23–5.12; p = 0.01) and longer operation time (mean difference = 15.27 min; 95% confidence interval = 9.67–20.87; p < 0.00001). There were no significant differences between SILC and MPLC regarding bile duct injury, bile leakage, wound infection, conversion to open surgery, retained common bile duct stones, total complication rate, and estimated blood loss. No difference was observed in postoperative pain assessed by a visual analogue scale between the two groups at four time points (6 h, 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h postprocedure).
Based on the current evidence, SILC did not result in better outcomes compared with MPLC and both were equivalent regarding complications. Considering the additional surgical technology and longer operation time, SILC should be chosen with careful consideration.
KeywordsLaparoscopic cholecystectomy Single-incision Conventional Meta-analysis Systematic review
We thank Jane Charbonneau, DVM from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Group China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac) for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Compliance with ethical standards
Yunxiao Lyu, Yunxiao Cheng, Bin Wang, Sicong Zhao, and Liang Chen have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 1.Muhe E (1991) [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy–late results]. Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie Supplement Kongressband Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie Kongress. Springer, Berlin, pp 416–423Google Scholar
- 3.Arezzo A, Passera R, Bullano A, Mintz Y, Kedar A, Boni L, Cassinotti E, Rosati R, Fumagalli Romario U, Sorrentino M, Brizzolari M, Di Lorenzo N, Gaspari AL, Andreone D, De Stefani E, Navarra G, Lazzara S, Degiuli M, Shishin K, Khatkov I, Kazakov I, Schrittwieser R, Carus T, Corradi A, Sitzman G, Lacy A, Uranues S, Szold A, Morino M (2017) Multi-port versus single-port cholecystectomy: results of a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (MUSIC trial). Surg Endosc 31:2872–2880CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Higgins J, Green SE (2011) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration (eds) Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Archiv für experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie 5, pp S38Google Scholar
- 37.Luna RA, Nogueira DB, Varela PS, Rodrigues Neto Ede O, Norton MJ, Ribeiro Ldo C, Peixoto AM, de Mendonca YL, Bendet I, Fiorelli RA, Dolan JP (2013) A prospective, randomized comparison of pain, inflammatory response, and short-term outcomes between single port and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27:1254–1259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 38.Lurje G, Raptis DA, Steinemann DC, Amygdalos I, Kambakamba P, Petrowsky H, Lesurtel M, Zehnder A, Wyss R, Clavien PA, Breitenstein S (2015) Cosmesis and body image in patients undergoing single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial (SPOCC-trial). Ann Surg 262:728–734 (discussion 734–725) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, DeNoto G, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Paraskeva P, Rosemurgy A, Ross S, Shah S (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1037–1047 (discussion 1047–1038) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 42.Noguera J, Tejada S, Tortajada C, Sanchez A, Munoz J (2013) Prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing the use of a single-port device with that of a flexible endoscope with no other device for transumbilical cholecystectomy: LLATZER-FSIS pilot study. Surg Endosc 27:4284–4290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 47.Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, Farantos C, Benetatos N, Mavridou P, Manataki A (2010) Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 24:1842–1848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 49.Zapf M, Yetasook A, Leung D, Salabat R, Denham W, Barrera E, Butt Z, Carbray J, Du H, Wang CE, Ujiki M (2013) Single-incision results in similar pain and quality of life scores compared with multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a blinded prospective randomized trial of 100 patients. Surgery 154:662–670 (discussion 670–661) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 50.Kumar S, Ahmad Z (2019) Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to the standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int Surg J 2019(6):4Google Scholar
- 57.Goel AC, Priyanka Gupta, Kumar Atul, Gupta Shalabh, Agarwal Ayush, Bhardwaj Deepak, Mishra Rajneesh Kumar, Fronek Jiri P J (2016) Comparative study of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with four-port conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-center experience. World J Lap Surg 9:9–12Google Scholar
- 58.Ashok Koirala RS, Thakur Dipendra, Agrawal Sunit, Chaudhary Bhuwan Lal, Poudel Sagar (2019) Comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with standard four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis. JKISTMC 1:10–15Google Scholar
- 59.FAHAD RIZWI MS, KHALID JAVED ABID (2014) Outcome of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis—a randomized control trial. PJMHS 8:243–246Google Scholar
- 73.Pasley WHSC (2013) Long-term follow-up shows no difference in port-site hernia incidence: single incision vs. traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27:482Google Scholar