Advertisement

Short-term outcomes of endoscopic gastro-jejunal revisions for treatment of dumping syndrome after Roux-En-Y gastric bypass

  • Catherine Tsai
  • Rudolf Steffen
  • Ulf Kessler
  • Hans Merki
  • Joerg ZehetnerEmail author
2019 SAGES Oral Dynamic
  • 96 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Dumping syndrome is a known long-term complication of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Most cases can be avoided with dietary and lifestyle changes. Severe dumping is characterized by multiple daily episodes with significant impact on quality-of-life. As dumping correlates with rapid pouch emptying through a dilated gastro-jejunal anastomosis (GJA), the aim was to assess endoscopic gastro-jejunal revisions (EGR) regarding feasibility, safety, and outcome.

Methods

From January 2016 to August 2018, we reviewed the electronic records of all patients with dumping syndrome undergoing EGR with the Apollo OverStitch suturing device (Apollo Endosurgery, Austin, Texas, USA). Demographics, procedure details, and outcome variables were recorded. Sigstad questionnaire was administered before and after surgery to assess symptomatic response.

Results

There were 40 patients (M:F = 13:27) treated with EGR for dumping. Mean procedure time was 18.5 min (12–41) with a median number of 1 suture (range 1–3) used. Mean anastomotic diameter was 22.6 mm (R 18–35) at the beginning and 6.2 mm (R 4–13) at the end of the procedure, with 100% technical success in narrowing the GJA. There were no intra-operative or 30-day complications. Repeat EGR was required in 9 patients (22.5%) for persistent/recurrent dumping. Two patients (5%) required a laparoscopic pouch revision. For patients with minimum 1-month follow-up who were treated only endoscopically, 33/37 (89.2%) had improved or resolved symptoms during the follow-up period. Mean follow-up time was 12.5 months (R1-33.8). Survey responses were available for 25/34 (73.5%) patients. Mean Sigstad score decreased from 13.9 (R 0–28) pre-operatively to 8.6 (R 0–28) after EGR.

Conclusion

EGR of the dilated GJA is a highly effective treatment option for dumping syndrome after RYGB. Due to its endoluminal approach, it is a feasible and safe procedure, and effective for immediate symptom resolution in most patients. In some patients, repeat narrowing of the anastomosis is necessary for the maintenance of symptom resolution.

Graphic Abstract

Keywords

Endoscopy Dumping Endosurgery Gastric bypass 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the patients for allowing us to be a part of their care and providing the information for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Catherine Tsai, Rudolf Steffen, Ulf Kessler, Hans Merki, and Joerg Zehetner have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 113164 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M et al (2014) Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet 384(9945):766–781.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adams KF, Schatzkin A, Harris TB et al (2006) Overweight, obesity, and mortality in a large prospective cohort of persons 50 to 71 years old. N Engl J Med 355(8):763–778.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa055643 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sjöström CD (2003) Surgery as an intervention for obesity. Results from the Swedish obese subjects study. Growth Horm IGF Res 13:S22–S26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cai JX, Schweitzer MA, Kumbhari V (2016) Endoscopic management of bariatric surgery complications. Surg laparosc endosc percutan Tech 26(2):93–101.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000230 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pories WJ (2008) Bariatric surgery: risks and rewards. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93(11):s89–s96.  https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-1641 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marsk R, Jonas E, Rasmussen F, Näslund E (2010) Nationwide cohort study of post-gastric bypass hypoglycaemia including 5,040 patients undergoing surgery for obesity in 1986–2006 in Sweden. Diabetologia 53(11):2307–2311.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-010-1798-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Emous M, Wolffenbuttel BHR, van Dijk G, Totté E, van Beek AP (2018) Long-term self-reported symptom prevalence of early and late dumping in a patient population after sleeve gastrectomy, primary, and revisional gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14(8):1173–1181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2018.04.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Craig CM, Liu L-F, Deacon CF, Holst JJ, McLaughlin TL (2017) Critical role for GLP-1 in symptomatic post-bariatric hypoglycaemia. Diabetologia 60(3):531–540.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-016-4179-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tack J, Arts J, Caenepeel P, De Wulf D, Bisschops R (2009) Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of postoperative dumping syndrome. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 6(10):583–590.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2009.148 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gasser M, Meier C, Herren S, Aubry E, Steffen R, Stanga Z (2017) Is testing for postprandial hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia after gastric bypass necessary? Clin Nutr.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2017.11.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Linner JH, Drew RL (1992) Reoperative surgery—indications, efficacy, and long-term follow-up. Am J Clin Nutr 55(2):606S–610S.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/55.2.606s CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thompson CC, Chand B, Chen YK et al (2013) Endoscopic suturing for transoral outlet reduction increases weight loss after roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Gastroenterology 145(1):129–137.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2013.04.002 e3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Horgan S, Jacobsen G, Weiss GD et al (2010) Incisionless revision of post-Roux-en-Y bypass stomal and pouch dilation: multicenter registry results. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6(3):290–295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2009.12.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tsai C, Steffen R, Kessler U, Merki H, Zehetner J (2018) Endoscopic gastrojejunal revisions following gastric bypass: lessons learned in more than 100 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3961-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stier C, Chiappetta S (2016) Endoluminal revision (OverStitch TM, Apollo Endosurgery) of the dilated gastroenterostomy in patients with late dumping syndrome after proximal roux-en-y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 26(8):1978–1984.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2266-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fernández-Esparrach G, Lautz DB, Thompson CC (2010) Peroral endoscopic anastomotic reduction improves intractable dumping syndrome in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6(1):36–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2009.04.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramadan M, Loureiro M, Laughlan K et al (2016) Risk of dumping syndrome after sleeve gastrectomy and roux-en-y gastric bypass: early results of a multicentre prospective study. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2016:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2570237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine Tsai
    • 1
  • Rudolf Steffen
    • 1
  • Ulf Kessler
    • 1
  • Hans Merki
    • 1
  • Joerg Zehetner
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Visceral SurgeryHirslanden Clinic Beau-SiteBerneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations