Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 1012–1018 | Cite as

Magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors (with video)

  • Ippei Matsuzaki
  • Masashi HattoriEmail author
  • Hiroki Yamauchi
  • Naoya Goto
  • Yuji Iwata
  • Takio Yokoi
  • Mafu Tsunemi
  • Makoto Kobayashi
  • Takeshi Yamamura
  • Ryoji Miyahara
Dynamic Manuscript
  • 82 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The feasibility of magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection (MAG-ESD) using a neodymium magnet for colorectal tumors has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to clarify the feasibility of MAG-ESD for colorectal tumors.

Methods

This prospective trial was conducted at Yamashita Hospital. MAG-ESD was performed for 49 colorectal tumors. The magnetic anchor comprised an internal magnet attached to an endoclip with 3-0 silk. Both external and internal magnets were made using neodymium magnets. The feasibility of traction achieved using MAG-ESD, en bloc resection rate, complete en bloc resection rate, time required for preparation and attachment of the magnetic anchor, procedure time, rate of retrieval of magnetic anchors, and adverse events were evaluated.

Results

MAG-ESDs were successfully performed for 48 colorectal tumors except for a rectal case in which the internal magnet stuck to the endoscope. En bloc resections and complete en bloc resections were achieved in all cases. Attaching the magnetic anchor required a median of 8 min (range 3–37 min). Median procedure time was 76 min (range 28–283 min) and the magnetic anchors were retrieved in all cases without adverse events.

Conclusion

MAG-ESD is feasible and safe in the colon and may facilitate the treatment of all difficult lesions. (UMIN000024100).

Keywords

Endoscopic submucosal dissection Magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection MAG-ESD 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank endoscopic technician, Natsuki Sako for her assistance during the conduct of the study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Drs. Ippei Matsuzaki, Masashi Hattori, Hiroki Yamauchi, Naya Goto, Yuji Iwata, Takio Yokoi, Mafu Tsunemi, Makoto Kobayashi, Takeshi Yamamura and Ryoji Miyahara have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Supplementary material

Video 1: Demonstration of the magnetic anchor-guided ESD procedure in the cecum.Supplementary material 1 (MP4 279722 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, Shirao K, Yamaguchi H, Saito D, Hosokawa K, Shimoda T, Yoshida S (2001) Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut 48:225–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gotoda T (2007) Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 10:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Toyonaga T, Man-i M, Fujita T, East E, Nishino E, Ono W, Morita Y, Sanuki T, Yoshida M, Kutsumi H, Inokuchi H, Azuma T (2010) Retrospective study of technical aspects and complications of endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading tumors of the colorectum. Endoscopy 42(9):714–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima Kodashima S, Muraki Y, Ono S, Yamamichi N, Tateishi A, Oka M, Ogura K, Kawabe T, Ichinose M, Omata M (2007) Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in 200 consecutive cases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:678–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y, Hotta K, Sakamoto N, Ikematsu H, Fukuzawa M, Kobayashi N, Nasu J, Michida T, Yoshida S, Ikehara H, Otake Y, Nakajima T, Matsuda T, Saito D (2010) A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 72:1217–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agapov M, Dvoinikova E (2014) Factors predicting clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the rectum and sigmoid colon during the learning curve. Endoscopy Internatinonal Open 02:E235–E240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim ES, Cho KB, Park KS, Lee KI, Jang BK, Chung WJ, Hwang JS (2011) Factors predictive of perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colorectal tumors. Endoscopy 43:573–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Takeuchi Y, Iishi H, Tanaka S, Saito Y, Ikematsu H, Kudo S, Sano Y, Hisabe T, Yahagi N, Saitoh Y, Igarashi M, Kobayashi K, Yamano H, Shimizu S, Tsuruta O, Inoue Y, Watanabe T, Nakamura H, Fujii T, Uedo N, Shimokawa T, Ishikawa H, Sugihara K (2014) Factors associated with technical difficulties and adeverse events of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: retrospective exploratory factor analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:1275–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yamasaki Y, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N, Kato M, Hamada K, Aoi K, Tonai Y, Matsuura N, Kanesaka T, Yamahshina T, Akasaka T, Hanaoka N, Higashino K, Ishihara R, Iishi H (2016) Traction-assisted colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection using clip and line: a feasibility study. Endosc Int Open 04:E51–E55Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ritsuno H, Sakomoto N, Osada T, Goto S, Murakami T, Ueyama H, Mori H, Matsumoto K, Beppu K, Shibuya T, Nagahara A, Ogihara T, Watanabe S (2014) Prospective clinical trial of traction device-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection of large superficial colorectal tumors using the S-O clip. Surg Endosc 28:3143–3149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mori H, Kobara H, Nishiyama N, Fujihara S, Matsunaga T, Masaki T (2017) Novel effective and repeatedly available ring-thread counter traction for safer colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc 31:3040–3047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nomura T, Kamei A, Sugimoto S, Oyamada J (2018) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection using a clip-on-clip traction method. Endoscopy 50:E197–E198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kobayashi T, Gotohda T, Tamakawa K, Ueda H, Kakizoe T (2004) Magnetic anchor for more effective endoscopic mucosal resection. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34:118–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gotoda T, Oda I, Tamakawa K, Ueda H, Kobayashi T, Kakizoe T (2009) Prospective clinical trial of magnetic-anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection for large early gastric cancer (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 69:10–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aihara H, Ryou M, Kumar N, Ryan MB, Thompson CC (2014) A novel magnetic countertraction device for endoscopic submucosal dissection significantly reduces procedure time and minimizes technical difficulty. Endoscopy 46:422–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Matsuzaki I, Miyahara R, Hirooka Y, Funasaka K, Furukawa K, Ohno E, Nakamura M, Kawashima H, Maeda O, Watanabe O, Ando T, Kobayashi M, Goto H (2014) Simplified magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection in dogs (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 80:712–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Matsuzaki I, Hattori M, Hirose K, Esaki M, Yoshikawa M, Yokoi T, Kobayashi M, Miyahara R, Hirooka Y, Goto H (2018) Magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 87:1576–1580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matsuzaki I, Isobe S, Hirose K, Marukawa T, Esaki M (2017) Magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection for colonic tumor. Gastrointest Endosc 85:1111–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jansen A, Keeman JN, Davies GA, Klopper PJ (1980) Early experiences with magnetic rings in resection of the distal colon. Neth J Surg 32:20–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Takao S, Matsuo Y, Shinchi H, Nakajima S, Aikou T, Iseji T, Yamanouchi E (2001) Magnetic compression anastomosis for benign obstruction of the common bile duct. Endoscopy 33:988–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wall J, Diana M, Leroy J, DeRuijter V, Gonzales KD, Lindner V, Harrison M, Marescaux J (2013) MAGNAMOSIS IV: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Endoscopy 45:643–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Park S, Bergs RA, Eberhart R, Baker L, Fernandez R, Cadeddu J (2007) Trocar-less instrumentation for laparoscopy: magnetic positioning of intra-abdominal camera and retractor. Ann Surg 245:379–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cadeddu J, Fernandez R, Desai M, Bergs R, Tracy C, Tang CT, Rao P, Desai M, Scott D (2009) Novel magnetically guided intra-abdominal camera to facilitate laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: initial human experience. Surg Endosc 23:1894–1899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dominguez G, Durand L, De Rosa J, Danguise E, Arozamena C, Ferraina PA (2009) Retraction and triangulation with neodymium magnetic forceps for single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 23:1660–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Choi YH, Lee HW, Lee SY, Han DH, Seo S, Jeon SS, Lee HM, Choi HY, Jeong BC (2016) Laparoendoscopic single-site simple nephrectomy using a magnetic anchoring system in a porcine model. Investig Clin Urol 57:208–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Guerron AD, Ortega CB, Park C, Portenier D (2017) Magnetic robot–assisted single-incision cholecystectomy. CRSLS e2017. 00073Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rivas H, Robles I, Riquelme F, Vivanco M, Jiménez J, Marinkovic B, Uribe M (2018) Magnetic surgery: results from first prospective clinical trial in 50 patients. Ann Surg 267:88–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Scott DJ, Tang SJ, Fernandez R, Bergs R, Goova MT, Zeltser I, Kehdy FJ, Cadeddu JA (2007) Completely transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments. Surg Endosc 21:2308–2316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Best SL, Bergs R, Gedeon M, Paramo J, Fernandez R, Cadeddu JA, Scott DJ (2011) Maximizing coupling strength of magnetically anchored surgical instruments: how thick can we go? Surg Endosc 25:153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ganz RA, Gostout CJ, Grudem J, Swanson W, Berg T, DeMeester TR (2008) Use of a magnetic sphincter for the treatment of GERD: a feasibility study. Gastrointest Endosc 67:287–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ryou M, Cantillon-Murphy P, Shaikh SN, Azagury D, Ryan MB, Lang JH, Thompson CC (2012) Magnetic pancreaticobiliary stents and retrieval system: obviating the need for repeat endoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 75:888–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Watanabe S, Sato T, Kato S, Hosono K, Kobayashi N, Nakajima A, Kubota K (2013) Positioning of nasobiliary tube using magnet-loaded catheters. Endoscopy 45:835–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Keller J, Fibbe C, Volke F, Gerber J, Mosse AC, Reimann-Zawadzki M, Rabinowitz E, Layer P, Schmitt D, Andresen V, Rosien U, Swain P (2011) Inspection of the human stomach using remote-controlled capsule endoscopy: a feasibility study in healthy volunteers (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 73:22–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zou WB, Hou XH, Xin L, Liu J, Bo LM, Yu GY, Liao Z, Li ZS (2015) Magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy vs. gastroscopy for gastric disease: a two-center self-controlled comparative trial. Endoscopy 47:525–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Saito Y, Kawano H, Takeuchi Y, Ohata K, Oka S, Hotta K, Okamoto K, Homma K, Uraoka T, Hisabe T, Chang DK, Zhou PH (2012) Current status of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in Japan and other Asian countries: progressing towards technical standardization. Dig Endosc 24:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Parra-Blanco A, Arnau MR, Nicolás-Pérez D, Gimeno-García AZ, González N, Díaz-Acosta JA, Jiménez A, Quintero E (2010) Endoscopic submucosal dissection training with pig models in a Western country. World J Gastroenterol 16:2895–2900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Uraoka T, Parra-Blanco A, Yahagi N (2013) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: is it suitable in western countries? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 28:406–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bhatt A, Abe S, Kumaravel A, Parsi MA, Stevens T, Jang S, Lopez R, Oda I, Vargo JJ, Saito Y (2016) Video-based supervision for training of endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 48:711–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Küttner-Magalhaes R, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Bruno MJ, Marcos-Pinto R, Rolanda C, Koch AD (2018) Training in endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection: face, content and expert validity of the live porcine model. United Eur Gastroenterol J 6:547–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Coman RM, Gotoda T, Draganov PV (2013) Training in endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastrointest Endosc 5:369378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kumta NA, Yamamoto H, Haber GB (2014) Training the next generation of Western endoscopists in endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointetst Endosc 80:680–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologyYamashita HospitalIchinomiyaJapan
  2. 2.Department of PathologyYamashita HospitalIchinomiyaJapan
  3. 3.Department of NursingYamashita HospitalIchinomiyaJapan
  4. 4.Department of GastroenterologyYokkaichi Municipal HospitalYokkaichiJapan
  5. 5.Department of EndoscopyNagoya University HospitalNagoyaJapan
  6. 6.Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations