Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 961–966 | Cite as

FES exam outcomes in year two of a proficiency-based endoscopic skills curriculum

  • Joshua J. WeisEmail author
  • Daniel J. Scott
  • Lauren Busato
  • Sara A. Hennessy
2018 SAGES Oral



FES certification is required to sit for the ABS Qualifying Exam. Previous work demonstrated a 40% FES pass rate for residents with standard clinical endoscopy training. After implementing a proficiency-based simulation curriculum, our FES pass rate increased to 87%. The purpose of this study was to monitor the success of our curriculum in its second year. We also hypothesized that residents who took the FES exam within 30 days of their clinical endoscopy rotation would have superior pass rates to residents who waited longer.


PGY4 residents (N = 12) underwent flexible endoscopy training including a 1 month clinical rotation plus proficiency-based simulation training using bench-top models (Trus, Operation Targeting Task) and a virtual reality task on the GI Mentor. Residents that passed FES on their first attempt were compared to residents that did not pass based on number of endoscopies logged, hours spent practicing on simulators, and time elapsed between completing their endoscopy rotation and taking the FES exam. FES total scores and section scores were compared to historical controls.


Nine residents (75%) passed FES on their first attempt. Overall, 80% of residents who tested within 30 days of their endoscopy rotation (n = 5) passed FES while 71% of residents who waited longer (n = 7) passed FES (p = non-significant). Residents that passed FES were not significantly different from residents who did not pass based on number of endoscopies logged or hours spent practicing on simulators. Compared to historical controls, scores on loop reduction improved significantly with the new curriculum.


FES pass rates decreased during the second year of our curriculum. Based on other literature, our trainees would benefit from higher volumes of endoscopy and/or a more robust proficiency-based simulation curriculum. Scheduling the FES exam in the month following the endoscopy rotation did not significantly improve pass rates.


Fundamentals of endoscopic skills Simulation Upper endoscopy Colonoscopy 


Compliance with ethical standards


Joshua J. Weis, Daniel J. Scott, Lauren Busato and Sara A. Hennessy have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Decker MR, Dodgion CM, Kwok AC et al (2014) Specialization and the current practices of general surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 218(1):8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Halverson AL, Hughes TG, Borgstrom DC, Sachdeva AK, DaRosa DA, Hoyt DB (2013) What surgical skills rural surgeons need to master. J Am Coll Surg 217(5):919–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zuckerman R, Doty B, Bark K, Heneghan S (2007) Rural versus non-rural differences in surgeon performed endoscopy: results of a national survey. Am Surg 73(9):903–905PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ABS (2014) Flexible endoscopy curriculum for general surgery residents. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  5. 5.
    SAGES fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) Required by American Board of Surgery, FES elevates the standards and training for minimally invasive surgery [press release]. PRWEB, March 6, 2014Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Poulose BK, Vassiliou MC, Dunkin BJ et al (2014) Fundamentals of endoscopic surgery cognitive examination: development and validity evidence. Surg Endosc 28(2):631–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vassiliou MC, Dunkin BJ, Fried GM et al (2014) Fundamentals of endoscopic surgery: creation and validation of the hands-on test. Surg Endosc 28(3):704–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hashimoto DA, Petrusa E, Phitayakorn R, Valle C, Casey B, Gee D (2017) A proficiency-based virtual reality endoscopy curriculum improves performance on the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery examination. Surg Endosc 32(3):1397–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ritter EM, Taylor ZA, Wolf KR et al (2017) Simulation-based mastery learning for endoscopy using the endoscopy training system: a strategy to improve endoscopic skills and prepare for the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) manual skills exam. Surg Endosc 32(1):413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wilcox V Jr, Trus T, Salas N, Martinez J, Dunkin BJ (2014) A proficiency-based skills training curriculum for the SAGES surgical training for endoscopic proficiency (STEP) program. J Surg Educ 71(3):282–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Van Sickle KR, Buck L, Willis R et al (2011) A multicenter, simulation-based skills training collaborative using shared GI Mentor II systems: results from the Texas Association of Surgical Skills Laboratories (TASSL) flexible endoscopy curriculum. Surg Endosc 25(9):2980–2986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gardner AK, Scott DJ, Willis RE et al (2017) Is current surgery resident and GI fellow training adequate to pass FES? Surg Endosc 31(1):352–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koch AD, Buzink SN, Heemskerk J et al (2008) Expert and construct validity of the Simbionix GI Mentor II endoscopy simulator for colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 22(1):158–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Felsher JJ, Olesevich M, Farres H et al (2005) Validation of a flexible endoscopy simulator. Am J Surg 189(4):497–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Plooy AM, Hill A, Horswill MS et al (2012) Construct validation of a physical model colonoscopy simulator. Gastrointest Endosc 76(1):144–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guzzetta AA, Weis JJ, Hennessy SA et al (2018) Proficiency-based preparation significantly improves FES certification performance. Surg Endosc 32(11):4451–4457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Snyder CW, Vandromme MJ, Tyra SL, Hawn MT (2009) Proficiency-based laparoscopic and endoscopic training with virtual reality simulators: a comparison of proctored and independent approaches. J Surg Educ 66(4):201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bell RH (2007) Surgical council on resident education: a new organization devoted to graduate surgical education. J Am Coll Surg 204(3):341–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mischna J. Personal Communication: Presentation and Manuscript for review by FES chairs. In: Weis JJ, ed 2018Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Faulx AL, Lightdale JR, Acosta RD et al (2017) Guidelines for privileging, credentialing, and proctoring to perform GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 85(2):273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    ACGME (2017) Defined category minimum numbers: general surgery effective for program graduates beginning academic year 2017–2018. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical EducationGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mueller CL, Kaneva P, Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC (2014) Colonoscopy performance correlates with scores on the FES manual skills test. Surg Endosc 28(11):3081–3085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ericsson KA (2008) Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med 15(11):988–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations