Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Rectal eversion: safe and effective way to achieve low transaction in minimally invasive Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery, short- and long-term outcomes

Abstract

Background

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis remains a gold standard in restoring continence in patient with ulcerative colitis. Achieving low transection can be challenging and may require mucosectomy with a hand-sewn anastomosis. Rectal eversion (RE) technique provides a safe and effective alternative for both open and minimally invasive approaches. The purpose of this study is to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent RE when compared to those who underwent conventional trans-abdominal transection.

Materials and methods

This is a retrospective review performed at tertiary care center. Patients undergoing proctectomy and pouch surgery by either standard approach or with RE from November 2004 to January 2017 were evaluated. Demographics, post-operative complications, as well as 1- and 3-year functional outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Total of 176 underwent proctocolectomy with creation of a J pouch and 88 (50%) had the RE technique utilized. The RE group had a higher rate of corticosteroid use at the time of surgery 59.1 versus 39.8% (p = 0.0156), but otherwise groups were statistically similar. 20 cases (26.1%) of RE group and 54 (61%) of conventional group cases were accomplished in minimally invasive fashion. There was no difference in the rates of 30- and 90-day complications. Functional outcomes data were available for up to 78.4% of patient with trans-abdominal approach and 64.7% in RE group. At 1 and 3 years after surgery, there was no difference in the number of bowel movements, fecal incontinence, or nocturnal bowel movements. The rates of returning to ileostomy or pouch revision were the same.

Conclusion

RE technique is safe and effective way to achieve a low transaction in J pouch surgery. The technique provides similar functional outcomes at 1 and 3 years after surgery and can be particularly useful in minimally invasive approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Scoglio D, Ali UA, Fichera A (2014) Surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis: ileorectal vs ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. World J Gastroenterol 20(37):13211–13218. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i37.13211

  2. 2.

    Nobel T, Khaitov S, Greenstein AJ (2016) Controversies in J pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis: a focus on handsewn versus stapled anastomosis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 22(9):2302–2309. https://doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0000000000000876

  3. 3.

    Holder-Murray J, Marsicovetere P, Holubar SD (2015) Minimally invasive surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 21(6):1443–1458. https://doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0000000000000316

  4. 4.

    Shrestha B (2016) Minimally invasive surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: current perspectives. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 7(2):214–216. https://doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i2.214

  5. 5.

    Poylin V, Mowschenson P, Nagle D, Cataldo T (2017) Rectal eversion technique. Dis Colon Rectum 60(12):1329–1331. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000932

  6. 6.

    Dignan RD, Kwa JA, Odom TA (1999) Stapler-facilitated rectal eversion. Dis Colon Rectum 42(11):1472–1474. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02235050

  7. 7.

    Zhuo C, Liang L, Ying M et al (2015) Laparoscopic low anterior resection and eversion technique combined with a nondog ear anastomosis for mid- and distal rectal neoplasms. Medicine (Baltimore). 94(50):e2285. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002285

  8. 8.

    de Lacy FB, Keller DS, Martin-Perez B, Emile SH, Chand M, Spinelli A, Lacy AM (2019) The current state of the transanal approach to the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 33(5):1368–1375

  9. 9.

    Zaghiyan K, Warusavitarne J, Spinelli A, Chandrasinghe P, Di Candido F, Fleshner P (2018) Technical variations and feasibility of transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and inflammatory bowel disease unclassified across continents. Tech Coloproctol 22(11):867–873

  10. 10.

    Mege D, Hain E, Lakkis Z, Maggiori L, Prost À la Denise J, Panis Y (2018) Is trans-anal total mesorectal excision really safe and better than laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with a perineal approach first in patients with low rectal cancer? A learning curve with case-matched study in 68 patients. Colorectal Dis 20(6):0143–0151

  11. 11.

    Williamson MER, Lewis WG, Miller AS, Sagar PM, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D (1995) Clinical and physiological evaluation of anorectal eversion during restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 82(10):1391–1394. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800821032

  12. 12.

    Miller AS, Lewis WG, Williamson MER, Sagar PM, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D (1996) Does eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy influence functional outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 39(5):489–493

Download references

Author information

VYP—Design, analysis, drafting, revising, final approval and agreement to be accountable, JC—Acquisition of data, analysis, drafting, revising, final approval and agreement to be accountable, PM—Design, revising, final approval and agreement to be accountable, TEC—Conception, drafting, revising, final approval and agreement to be accountable

Correspondence to Vitaliy Y. Poylin.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Jose Cataneo, Peter Mowschenson, Thomas Cataldo, and Vitaliy Poylin have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cataneo, J., Mowschenson, P., Cataldo, T.E. et al. Rectal eversion: safe and effective way to achieve low transaction in minimally invasive Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery, short- and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 34, 1290–1293 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06896-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
  • Rectal eversion
  • Low pelvic transection