Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 915–919 | Cite as

Contrast of therapeutic effects between CBD incision and LLHD stump in biliary tract exploration of LLS for hepatolithiasis

  • Huiling WangEmail author
  • Yingliang Ou
  • Jinrui Ou
  • Zhixiang Jian
Article
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) followed by a biliary tract exploration is used to treat left lateral hepatolithiasis. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of two methods of biliary tract explorations in LLSs: biliary tract exploration through a common bile duct (CBD) incision or through the left lateral hepatic duct (LLHD) stump.

Methods

One hundred eight patients were retrospectively analyzed in our hospital from 2009 to 2018. To compare different methods of biliary tract explorations during LLSs, the patients were divided into 2 groups: 36 patients underwent biliary tract exploration through the LLHD stump (LLSS group), and 72 patients underwent biliary tract exploration through the CBD incision (LLSC group). Clinical data on disease characteristics, surgical outcomes, and surgery-related complications were compared between the 2 groups.

Results

Bile duct stones were successfully cleared in all patients. For 2 patients in the LLSS group and 3 patients in the LLSC group, treatment was switched to laparotomy. There were no significant differences in the total operation time (P = 0.09), incidence of bleeding volume (P = 0.33), and bile leakage (P = 0.12) between the two groups. The time of choledochoscopy in the LLSS group was significantly lower than that in the LLSC group (P = 0.03). No bile duct injuries, strictures, recurrent stones, or other adverse events were observed in any patients during follow-up.

Conclusions

Exploration of the biliary tract through the LLHD stump is safe and provides satisfactory results for select patients.

Keywords

Hepatolithiasis Laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy Lithotripsy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was undertaken in partial fulfillment for Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Huiling Wang, Yingliang Ou, Jinrui Ou, and Zhuixiang Jian have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Pausawasdi A, Watanapa P (1997) Hepatolithiasis: epidemiology and classification. Hepatogastroenterology 44(14):314–316PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tazuma S, Unno M, Igarashi Y et al (2017) Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016. J Gastroenterol 52(3):276–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chou ST, Chan CW (1980) Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: a necropsy study. Pathology 12(3):415–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheung MT, Kwok PC (2005) Liver resection for intrahepatic stones. Arch Surg 140(10):993–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sakpal SV, Babel N, Chamberlain RS (2009) Surgical management of hepatolithiasis. HPB 11(3):194–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Uenishi T, Hamba H, Takemura S et al (2009) Outcomes of hepatic resection for hepatolithiasis. Am J Surg 198(2):199–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Uchiyama K, Onishi H, Tani M et al (2003) Long-term prognosis after treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis. Ann Surg 238(1):97–102PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen MF, Jan YY, Wang CS et al (1993) A reappraisal of cholangiocarcinoma in patient with hepatolithiasis. Cancer 71(8):2461–2465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fan ST, Wong J (1992) Complications of hepatolithiasis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(3):324–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hwang S, Lee SG, Kim MH et al (2008) Intraoperative biliary exploration through the left hepatic duct orifice during left hepatectomy in patients with left-sided hepatolithiasis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393(3):383–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sun WB, Han BL, Cai JX (2000) The surgical treatment of isolated left-sided hepatolithiasis: a 22-year experience. Sugery 127(5):493–497Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jamal KN, Smith H, Ratnasingham K et al (2016) Meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopic ultrasonography and intraoperative cholangiography in detection of common bile duct stones. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 98(4):244–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aziz O, Ashrafian H, Jones C et al (2014) Laparoscopic ultrasonography versus intra-operative cholangiogram for the detection of common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. Int J Surg 12(7):712–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hu MG, Zhao GD, Ouyang CG et al (2013) Lithotomy using cholangioscopy via the left hepatic duct orifice versus the common bile duct in laparoscopic treatment of left-sided hepatolithiasis: a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(4):332–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huiling Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yingliang Ou
    • 1
  • Jinrui Ou
    • 1
  • Zhixiang Jian
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s HospitalGuangdong Academy of Medical SciencesGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations