Advertisement

Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a cognitive task analysis framework toward training design

  • Sudeep HegdeEmail author
  • Mark A. Gromski
  • Tansel Halic
  • Melih Turkseven
  • Zhaohui Xia
  • Berk Çetinsaya
  • Mandeep S. Sawhney
  • Daniel B. Jones
  • Suvranu De
  • Cullen D. Jackson
Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Background

One of the major impediments to the proliferation of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) training in Western countries is the lack of sufficient experts as instructors. One way to address this gap is to develop didactic systems, such as surgical simulators, to support the role of trainers. Cognitive task analysis (CTA) has been used in healthcare for the design and improvement of surgical training programs, and therefore can potentially be used for design of similar systems for ESD.

Objective

The aim of the study was to apply a CTA-based approach to identify the cognitive aspects of performing ESD, and to generate qualitative insights for training.

Materials and methods

Semi-structured interviews were designed based on the CTA framework to elicit knowledge of ESD practitioners relating to the various tasks involved in the procedure. Three observations were conducted of expert ESD trainers either while they performed actual ESD procedures or at a training workshop. Interviews were either conducted over the phone or in person. Interview participants included four experts and four novices. The observation notes and interviews were analyzed for emergent qualitative themes and relationships.

Results

The qualitative analysis yielded thematic insights related to four main cognition-related categories: learning goals/principles, challenges/concerns, strategies, and decision-making. The specific insights under each of these categories were systematically mapped to the various tasks inherent to the ESD procedure.

Conclusions

The CTA approach was applied to identify cognitive themes related to ESD procedural tasks. Insights developed based on the qualitative analysis of interviews and observations of ESD practitioners can be used to inform the design of ESD training systems, such as virtual reality-based simulators.

Keywords

Endoscopic surgery training Endoscopic submucosal dissection Gastrointestinal cancer ESD Human factors Cognitive task analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of this study by NIH/NCI grant R01CA197491. The authors are grateful to Dr. Stavros N. Stavropoulos for providing his insights on the ESD procedure and utility of the CTA for training design, and for facilitating, in part, the data collection for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Dr. Sudeep Hegde reports grants and personal fees from the National Cancer Institute, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Cullen Jackson reports grants from the NIH/National Cancer Institute, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Aptima, Inc., outside the submitted work. Drs. Sudeep Hegde, Mark A. Gromski, Tansel Halic, Zhaohui Xia, Melih Turkseven, Mandeep S. Sawhney, Daniel B. Jones, Suvranu De, and Mr. Berk Cetinsaya have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T, Emura F, Ikehara H, Mashimo Y, Kikuchi T, Fu K-I, Sano Y, Saito D (2007) Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 66:966–973.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yamamoto H, Hirobumi K, Tomizo Y, Norio I, Yukihiro S, Yutaka S, Toshihiko H, Kenji U, Kenichi I, Kentaro S (1999) A successful single-step endoscopic resection of a 40 millimeter flat-elevated tumor in the rectum: endoscopic mucosal resection using sodium. Gastrointest Endosc 50:701–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hotta K, Oyama T, Shinohara T, Miyata Y, Takahashi A, Kitamura Y, Tomori A (2010) Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc 22:302–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T, Fukunaga S, Sakamoto T, Uraoka T, Nakajima T, Ikehara H, Fu K-I, Itoi T, Fujii T (2010) Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc 24:343–352.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0562-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hon SSF, Ng SSM, Lee JFY, Li JCM, Lo AWI (2010) In vitro porcine training model for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection: an inexpensive and safe way to acquire a complex endoscopic technique. Surg Endosc 24:2439–2443.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0982-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oda I, Odagaki T, Suzuki H, Nonaka S, Yoshinaga S (2012) Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer based on trainee experience. Dig Endosc 24:129–132.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01265.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iacopini F, Bella A, Costamagna G, Gotoda T, Saito Y, Elisei W, Grossi C, Rigato P, Scozzarro A (2012) Stepwise training in rectal and colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection with differentiated learning curves. Gastrointest Endosc 76:1188–1196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Draganov PV, Gotoda T, Chavalitdhamrong D, Wallace MB (2013) Techniques of endoscopic submucosal dissection: application for the Western endoscopist? Gastrointest Endosc 78:677–688.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.07.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Herreros de Tejada A (2014) ESD training: a challenging path to excellence. World J Gastrointest Endosc 6:112–120.  https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v6.i4.112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Emmanuel A, Gulati S, Burt M, Hayee B, Haji A (2018) Using endoscopic submucosal dissection as a routine component of the standard treatment strategy for large and complex colorectal lesions in a western tertiary referral unit. Dis Colon Rectum 61:743–750.  https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gotoda T, Friedland S, Hamanaka H, Soetikno R (2005) A learning curve for advanced endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc 62:866–867.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2005.07.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Draganov PV, Coman RM, Gotoda T (2014) Training for complex endoscopic procedures: how to incorporate endoscopic submucosal dissection skills in the West? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:119–121.  https://doi.org/10.1586/17474124.2014.864552 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oyama T, Yahagi N, Ponchon T, Kiesslich T, Berr F (2015) How to establish endoscopic submucosal dissection in Western countries. World J Gastroenterol 21:11209–11220.  https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fukami N (2015) Endoscopic submucosal dissection. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R, Kusano C, Gotoda T (2011) Development of expertise in endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Tech Gastrointest Endosc 13:100–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tgie.2011.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coman RM, Gotoda T, Draganov PV (2013) Training in endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastrointest Endosc 5:369.  https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v5.i8.369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vázquez-Sequeiros E, de Miguel DB, Foruny Olcina JR, González Martín JA, García M, Juzgado Lucas D, Garrido E, González C, Parra Blanco A, Arnau MRBA (2009) Training model for teaching endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric tumors. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 101:546–552.  https://doi.org/10.4321/S1130-01082009000800005 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Clark R, Pugh C, Yates K, Inaba K, Green D, Sullivan M (2012) The use of cognitive task analysis to improve instructional descriptions of procedures. J Surg Res 173:e37–e42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Militello LG, Hutton RJB (1998) Applied cognitive task analysis (ACTA): a practitioner’s toolkit for understanding cognitive task demands. Ergonomics 41:1618–1641.  https://doi.org/10.1080/001401398186108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grunwald T, Clark D, Fisher S, McLaughlin M, Narayanan S, Piepol D (2004) Using cognitive task analysis to facilitate collaboration in development of simulator to accelerate surgical training. Stud Health Technol Inform 98:114–120Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sullivan ME, Brown CVR, Peyre SE, Salim A, Martin M, Towfigh S, Grunwald T (2007) The use of cognitive task analysis to improve the learning of percutaneous tracheostomy placement. Am J Surg 1:193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMJSURG.2006.09.005 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sullivan ME, Ortega A, Wasserberg N, Kaufman H, Nyquist J, Clark R (2008) Assessing the teaching of procedural skills: can cognitive task analysis add to our traditional teaching methods? Am J Surg 195:20–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Luker KR, Sullivan ME, Peyre SE, Sherman R, Grunwald T (2008) The use of a cognitive task analysis–based multimedia program to teach surgical decision making in flexor tendon repair. Am J Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.052 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Velmahos GC, Toutouzas KG, Sillin LF, Chan L, Clark RE, Theodorou D, Maupin F (2004) Cognitive task analysis for teaching technical skills in an inanimate surgical skills laboratory. Am J Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2002.12.005 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yates K, Sullivan M, Clark R (2012) Integrated studies on the use of cognitive task analysis to capture surgical expertise for central venous catheter placement and open cricothyrotomy. Am J Surg 203:76–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cetinsaya B, Gromski M, Lee S, Xia Z, Demirel D, Halic T, Bayrak C, Jackson C, De S, Hegde S, Cohen J, Sawhney M, Jones DB (2018) A task and performance analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) surgery. Surg Endosc.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6119-y Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Scientific Software Development, GmbH: Atlas.ti 7, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ignatov V, Tonev A, Kolev N, Zlatarov A, Shterev S, Kirilova T, Ivanov K (2016) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colon cancer. In: Colorectal Cancer—From Pathogenesis to Treatment. InTechGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kirschner PA, Sweller J, Clark RE (2006) Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educ Psychol 41:75–86.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sudeep Hegde
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mark A. Gromski
    • 2
  • Tansel Halic
    • 3
  • Melih Turkseven
    • 4
  • Zhaohui Xia
    • 4
  • Berk Çetinsaya
    • 5
  • Mandeep S. Sawhney
    • 1
  • Daniel B. Jones
    • 1
  • Suvranu De
    • 4
  • Cullen D. Jackson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain MedicineBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisUSA
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of Central ArkansasConwayUSA
  4. 4.Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA
  5. 5.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of Arkansas at Little RockLittle RockUSA

Personalised recommendations