Adverse outcomes and short-term cost implications of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy
Bile duct injury (BDI) is an uncommon but major complication of cholecystectomy that has a poorly defined magnitude of effect on hospital costs. This study sought to calculate the healthcare costs, length of stay, and discharge status associated with bile duct injury in patients undergoing cholecystectomy in the United States.
The Premier Healthcare Database, which comprises hospital-billing records from over 700 hospitals in the United States, was queried for all patients undergoing cholecystectomy between January 2010 and March 2018. BDI was defined by ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and operative information were extracted. Hospital costs, length of stay, and discharge status were compared between BDI and non-BDI patients. Propensity score matching was used to minimize confounding factors. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate the association between BDI and the outcomes variables.
A total of 1,168,288 cholecystectomies were identified. BDI occurred in 878 patients (0.08%). Laparoscopy was the most common approach (> 95%). The majority of BDI occurred during inpatient admissions (71.0%). BDI patients had higher index admission hospital costs ($18,771 vs. $12,345, p < 0.0001), increased rate of discharge to an institutional post-acute care facility (odds ratio 3.89, 95% CI 2.92–5.19, p < 0.0001), and increased risk of readmission within 30 days after discharge (odds ratio 1.86, 95% CI 1.52–2.28, p < 0.0001), compared to patients without BDI. Among inpatient cholecystectomies, BDI was associated with increased length of stay (8.6 days vs. 4.8 days, p < 0.0001).
BDI is associated with significantly increased hospital costs, length of stay, 30-day readmission, and discharge to an institutional post-acute care facility.
KeywordsCholecystectomy Complication Cost
The authors acknowledge data analytic support by Bidusee Ray from Mu Sigma.
No outside funding was obtained for this article.
Compliance with ethical standards
Dr. Wei and Mr. Johnson are employees of and have an equity interest in Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. Dr. Patkar is an employee of and has an equity interest in Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA. Drs. O’Brien, Bhutiani, Rao, Vitale, and Martin have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 1.Hall MJ, Schwartzman A, Zhang J, Liu X (2017) Ambulatory surgery data from Hospitals and Ambulatory Surgery Centers: United States, 2010. Natl Health Stat Rep 102:1–15Google Scholar
- 11.Premier Inc (2018) Premier healthcare database white paper: data that informs and performs. Premier applied sciences. Premier Inc, CharlotteGoogle Scholar
- 27.Sicklick JK, Camp MS, Lillemoe KD, Melton GB, Yeo CJ, Campbell KA, Talamini MA, Pitt HA, Coleman J, Sauter PA, Cameron JL (2005) Surgical management of bile duct injuries sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: perioperative results in 200 patients. Ann Surg 241:786–792 discussion 793-785 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Wakabayashi G, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Endo I, Umezawa A, Asai K, Suzuki K, Mori Y, Okamoto K, Pitt HA, Han H-S, Hwang T-L, Yoon Y-S, Yoon D-S, Choi I-S, Huang WS-W, Giménez ME, Garden OJ, Gouma DJ, Belli G, Dervenis C, Jagannath P, Chan ACW, Lau WY, Liu K-H, Su C-H, Misawa T, Nakamura M, Horiguchi A, Tagaya N, Fujioka S, Higuchi R, Shikata S, Noguchi Y, Ukai T, Yokoe M, Cherqui D, Honda G, Sugioka A, Santibañes E, Supe AN, Tokumura H, Kimura T, Yoshida M, Mayumi T, Kitano S, Inomata M, Hirata K, Sumiyama Y, Inui K, Yamamoto M (2018) Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci 25:73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Chen CB, Palazzo F, Doane SM, Winter JM, Lavu H, Chojnacki KA, Rosato EL, Yeo CJ, Pucci MJ (2017) Increasing resident utilization and recognition of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study from an academic medical center. Surg Endosc 31:1627–1635CrossRefGoogle Scholar