Fashioning enterotomy closure after totally laparoscopic ileocolic anastomosis for right colon cancer: a multicenter experience
- 296 Downloads
Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy is a commonly performed procedure. Little is known on how to perform the enterotomy closure after stapled side-to-side intracorporeal anastomosis.
A multicentric case-controlled study has been designed to compare different ways to fashion enterotomy closure: double layer versus single layer, sewn versus stapled, and robotic versus laparoscopic approach. Furthermore, additional characteristics including sutures’ materials, interrupted versus running suture and the presence of deep corner suture has been investigated.
We collected data for 1092 patients who underwent right hemicolectomy at ten centers. We analyzed 176 robotic against 916 laparoscopic anastomosis: no significant differences were found in terms of bleedings (p = 0.455) and anastomotic leak (p = 0.405). We collected data from 126 laparoscopic sewn single-layer versus 641 laparoscopic sewn double-layer anastomosis: a significant reduction was recorded in terms of leaks in double-layer group (p = 0.02). About double-layer characteristics, we found a significant reduction of bleedings (p = 0.008) and leaks (p = 0.017) with a running suture; similarly, a reduction of bleedings (p = 0.001) and leaks (p = 0.005) was observed with the usage of deep corner closure. The presence of a barbed suture thread seemed to significantly reduce both bleedings (p = 0.001) and leaks (p = 0.001). We found no significant differences in terms of bleedings (p = 0.245) and anastomotic leak (p = 0.660) comparing sewn versus stapled anastomosis.
Fashioning a stapled ileocolic intracorporeal anastomosis, we can recommend the adoption of a double-layer enterotomy closure using a running barbed suture in the first layer. Totally, stapled closure and robotic assistance have to be considered a non-inferior alternative.
KeywordsEnterotomy closure Laparoscopic colectomy Right colon cancer
Compliance with ethical standards
M. Milone, U. Elmore, M.E. Allaix, P.P. Bianchi, A. Biondi, L. Boni, U. Bracale, E. Cassinotti, G. Ceccarelli, F. Corcione, D. Cuccurullo, M. Degiuli, Nicolò De Manzini, D. D’Ugo, G. Formisano, M. Manigrasso, M. Morino, S. Palmisano, R. Persiani, R. Reddavid, F. Rondelli, N. Velotti, R. Rosati, and Giovanni Domenico De Palma have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 2.Milone M, Elmore U, Di Salvo E, Delrio P, Bucci L, Ferulano GP, Napolitano C, Angiolini MR, Bracale U, Clemente M, D’ambra M, Luglio G, Musella M, Pace U, Rosati R, Milone F (2015) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers. Surg Endosc 29(8):2314–2320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Milone M, Angelini P, Berardi G, Burati M, Corcione F, Delrio P, Elmore U, Lemma M, Manigrasso M, Mellano A, Muratore A, Pace U, Rega D, Rosati R, Tartaglia E, De Palma GD (2018) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic left colectomy for splenic flexure cancer: results from a multi-institutional audit on 181 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 32(8):3467–3473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Ricci C, Casadei R, Alagna V, Zani E, Taffurelli G, Pacilio CA, Minni F (2017) A critical and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 402(3):417–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Bracale U, Merola G, Cabras F, Andreuccetti J, Corcione F, Pignata G (2018) The use of barbed suture for intracorporeal mechanical anastomosis during a totally laparoscopic right colectomy: is it safe? A retrospective nonrandomized comparative multicenter study. Surg Innov 25(3):267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Feroci F, Giani I, Baraghini M, Romoli L, Zalla T, Quattromani R, Cantafio S, Scatizzi M (2018) Barbed versus traditional suture for enterotomy closure after laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal mechanical anastomosis: a case–control study. Updates Surg 70(4):433–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Magistro C, Lernia SD, Ferrari G, Zullino A, Mazzola M, De Martini P, De Carli S, Forgione A, Bertoglio CL, Pugliese R (2013) Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy for colon cancer: is there any advantage in short-term outcomes? A prospective comparative assessment in our center. Surg Endosc 27(7):2613–2618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Neutzling CB, Lustosa SA, Proenca IM, da Silva EM, Matos D (2012) Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 15(2):CD003144Google Scholar
- 23.Scotton G, Contardo T, Zerbinati A, Tosato SM, Orsini C, Morpurgo E (2018) From laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal anastomosis to robot-assisted intracorporeal anastomosis to totally robotic right colectomy for cancer: the evolution of robotic multiquadrant abdominal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 28(10):1216–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Trastulli S, Coratti A, Guarino S, Piagnerelli R, Annecchiarico M, Coratti F, Di Marino M, Ricci F, Desiderio J, Cirocchi R, Parisi A (2015) Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis compared with laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis: a retrospective multicentre study. Surg Endosc 29(6):1512–1521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Omotosho P, Yurcisin B, Ceppa E, Miller J, Kirsch D, Portenier DD (2011) In vivo assessment of an absorbable and nonabsorbable knotless barbed suture for laparoscopic single-layer enterotomy closure: a clinical and biomechanical comparison against nonbarbed suture. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21(10):893–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar