Lateral thermal spread induced by energy devices: a porcine model to evaluate the influence on the recurrent laryngeal nerve
Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis is a frequently observed complication after esophagectomy, and thermal injury is considered to be one of the causes. The difference in the lateral thermal spread associated with the grasping range of various energy devices remains unknown.
Ultrasonic devices (Harmonic® HD1000i and Sonicision™) and a vessel-sealing device (Ligasure™) were studied. We evaluated the temperature of these devices, the activation time required, and the thermal spread on porcine muscle when the devices were used with different grasping ranges (thermal spread study). In addition, we evaluated the influence of thermal spread by short grasping use of the energy devices on the viability of RLN in a live porcine model (NIM study).
In the thermal spread study, the temperature of the ultrasonic devices lowered as grasping range increased, whereas the highest temperature of Ligasure was observed when used with two-thirds grasping. The activation time of ultrasonic devices became longer as grasping range increased, whereas the grasping range did not influence the activation time of Ligasure. Thermal spreads 1 mm from the energy devices were unaffected by the grasping ranges. Although the temperature of the Ligasure was lower than that of the ultrasonic devices, thermal spread by Ligasure was significantly greater than that induced by the ultrasonic devices. In the NIM study, the activation of the Sonicision with one-third grasping range did not cause EMG changes at distances of up to 1 mm from the RLN, whereas applying Ligasure with a one-third grasping range 1 mm away from the RLN led to a critical result.
The grasping range did not influence the thermal spread induced by the energy devices. Ultrasonic devices may be safer in terms of lateral thermal spread to the RLN than Ligasure.
KeywordsEsophageal cancer Thermal spread Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis Energy device Grasping range Continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring
Compliance with ethical standards
Drs. Masaru Hayami, Masayuki Watanabe, Shinji Mine, Yu Imamura, Akihiko Okamura, Masami Yuda, Kotaro Yamashita, Tasuku Toihata, Yoshiaki Shoji, and Naoki Ishizuka have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 18.Randolph GW, Dralle H, International Intraoperative Monitoring Study G, Abdullah H, Barczynski M, Bellantone R, Brauckhoff M, Carnaille B, Cherenko S, Chiang FY, Dionigi G, Finck C, Hartl D, Kamani D, Lorenz K, Miccolli P, Mihai R, Miyauchi A, Orloff L, Perrier N, Poveda MD, Romanchishen A, Serpell J, Sitges-Serra A, Sloan T, Van Slycke S, Snyder S, Takami H, Volpi E, Woodson G (2011) Electrophysiologic recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during thyroid and parathyroid surgery: international standards guideline statement. Laryngoscope 121(Suppl 1):S1–S16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Hikage M, Kamei T, Nakano T, Abe S, Katsura K, Taniyama Y, Sakurai T, Teshima J, Ito S, Niizuma N, Okamoto H, Fukutomi T, Yamada M, Maruyama S, Ohuchi N (2017) Impact of routine recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring in prone esophagectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection. Surg Endosc 31:2986–2996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Milsom J, Trencheva K, Monette S, Pavoor R, Shukla P, Ma J, Sonoda T (2012) Evaluation of the safety, efficacy, and versatility of a new surgical energy device (THUNDERBEAT) in comparison with Harmonic ACE, LigaSure V, and EnSeal devices in a porcine model. Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:378–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar