Advertisement

Preaponeurotic endoscopic repair (REPA) of diastasis recti associated or not to midline hernias

  • Derlin Marcio Juárez Muas
Article

Abstract

Background

Diastasis recti is a common pathology during pregnancy and puerperium, usually associated with midline hernias, with aesthetic and symptomatic problems. This approach allows us to restore the alba line, without entering the abdominal cavity.

Materials and methods

Between April 2014 and July 2017, 50 patients underwent surgery, 94% female (mean age 38). Ultrasonography confirmed diagnosis. Recti diastasis was associated with midline defects in 100%. The preaponeurotic endoscopic repair is done with suprapubic approach and in both iliac fossae. A preaponeurotic new cavity was created with dissection of the subcutaneous cellular tissue and then recti plication with barbed suture was performed. The wall is reinforced with polypropylene mesh. Drainage is left systematically.

Results

Diastasis recti < 50 mm (55.5%) was diagnosed, from 51 to 80 mm (29.6%), and > 81 mm (14.9%). Recti plication with bearded suture was performed. It was associated with external oblique release in 32% of patients, being unilateral (87.5%). Light/intermediate (90%) and heavy (10%) polypropylene meshes were placed, being fixed with absorbable (62%) and non-absorbable material (38%). Navel was reinserted using internal or external sutures. The average surgical time is 83 min. There are no intraoperative complications, but PO seroma finding 12%. The average hospital stay was 1.3 days, with pain level 3/10 according to AVS. The patients returned to their usual activities after 16.5 days. No complications or recurrences were observed by clinical and sonographic control at 18 months in 74% of patients. The patients were followed up at 39 months. Patient satisfaction was reported as 96%.

Conclusions

Diastasis recti is a common pathology with aesthetic and symptomatic problems. Endoscopic surgery allowed us to resolve the parietal defect with plication of recti and placement of preaponeurotic reinforcement prosthesis, increasing the safety of the repair, without entering the abdominal cavity, with a short hospitalization and no complications or recurrence in 3 years.

Keywords

Preaponeurotic endoscopic repair Recti plication Diastasis recti 

Notes

Acknowledgements

There is no financial support for this study by any pharmaceutical or device suppliers. The author has not received any honoraria, gift or arrangements regarding patents related to this specific paper.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Derlin Marcio Juárez Muas has no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Mota P, Pascoal AG, Sancho F, Bø K (2012) Test-retest and intrarater reliability of 2-dimensional ultrasound measurements of distance between rectus abdominis in women. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 42(11):940–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Juárez MD, Verasay G, Garcia Walter M (2017) Reparación endoscópica prefascial de la diástasis de los rectos: descripción de una nueva técnica. Rev Hispanoam Hernia 5(2):47–51.  https://doi.org/10.20960/rhh.33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moreno-Egea A (2016) Abdominoplastía y reparación de hernia incisional: lo que un cirujano general debe saber. Rev Hispanoam Hernia 4(1):5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bezama Murray J, Debandi LA, Haddad AM, Bezama UP (2009) Diástasis de los rectos. Técnica quirúrgica original. Rev Chilena de Cirugía 61(1):97–100Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bezama Murray J (2017) Técnica quirúrgica para reparar la diástasis de los rectos asociada a hernia umbilical. Diez años de experiencia. Rev Hispanoam Hernia 5(2):52–56.  https://doi.org/10.20960/rhh.34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daes J (2016) Evolución de la reparación laparascópicade las hernias ventrales y del sitio de la incisión. Rev Hispanoam Hernia 4(3):83–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bittner R, Bingener-Casey J, Dietz U, Fabian M, Ferzli GS, Fortelny RH, et al (2014) International Endohernia Society. (IEHS) guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society. (IEHS). Part 1. Surg Endosc 28:2–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, Jategaonkar PA, Amar V, Gokul KS, Srikanth B (2009) Laparoscopic repair of diastasis recti using the “Venetian blinds” technique prosthetic reinforcement: a retrospective study. Hernia 13(3):287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daes J (2014) Endoscopic subcutaneous approach to component separation. J Am Coll Surg 218:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rosen M (2014) Separación endoscópica de componentes. Atlas de Reconstrución de la Pared Abdominal, vol 11. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 185–201Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Daes J (2016) Evolución de la reparación laparoscópica de las hernias ventrales y del sitio de la incisión. Rev Hispanoam Hernia 4(3):83–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bellido Luque J, Bellido Luque A, Valdivia J, Suárez Grau JM, Gómez Menchero J, García Moreno J, Guadalajara Jurado J (2015) Totally endoscopic surgery on diastasis recti associated with midline hernias. The advantages of a minimally invasive approach. Prospective cohort study. Hernia 19(3):493–501.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1300-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Timmermans L, de Goede B, van Dijk SM, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2014) Meta-analysis of sublay versus onlay mashrepair in incisional hernia surgery. Am J Surg 207(6):980–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hospital Público Materno InfantilSaltaArgentina

Personalised recommendations