Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 1100–1110 | Cite as

Short-term and long-term results of a randomized study comparing high tie and low tie inferior mesenteric artery ligation in laparoscopic rectal anterior resection: subanalysis of the HTLT (High tie vs. low tie) study

  • Shoichi FujiiEmail author
  • Atsushi Ishibe
  • Mitsuyoshi Ota
  • Hirokazu Suwa
  • Jun Watanabe
  • Chikara Kunisaki
  • Itaru Endo
Article

Abstract

Background

In rectal anterior resection, a clear consensus regarding the optimal level of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation does not exist because of a lack of randomized trials. We conducted a randomized trial to determine if the IMA should be tied at the origin (high tie, HT) or distal to the left colic artery (low tie, LT) (HTLT study). This study is a subanalysis of HTLT study for laparoscopic surgery.

Methods

All candidates were randomly divided into the HT or LT groups. The lymph node dissection around the origin of the IMA was performed in the LT group. The stratified factor was the approach (open or laparoscopy). Evaluation parameters were operative factors, short-term and long-term results. In the present study, laparoscopic surgeries were examined as subgroup analysis.

Results

From June 2006 to September 2012, 331 patients were registered. Two hundred and fifteen patients (107 for HT: 108 for LT) underwent laparoscopic surgeries. There was no difference between the groups in background. The incidence of anastomotic leakage (HT: LT %) showed no significant differences for grade 2 or higher (11.2:9.3), and grade 3 or higher (2.8:4.6). There were no differences in operative time (200:205 min), blood loss (15:15 ml), number of dissected lymph nodes (22:20), and postoperative hospital stay (10:10 days). The incidence of bowel obstruction in HT was significant (3.7 vs. 0%, p = 0.043). There were no significant differences in overall survival (5-year: 91.3 vs. 90.2%, p = 0.850) and disease-free survival (5-year: 83.2 vs. 78.0%, p = 0.525). There were no differences in the first recurrent site and death reason between both groups. The risk factors for leakage were being male and an anastomotic level in a multivariate analysis by logistic regression.

Conclusion

The IMA ligation level was unrelated to anastomotic leakage. No significant difference was detected in long-term results between HT and LT.

Keywords

Laparoscopic Rectal anterior resection Inferior mesenteric artery High tie Low tie Randomized study 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mari S. Oba for the statistical contributions.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Shoichi Fujii, Atsushi Ishibe, Mitsuyoshi Ota, Hirokazu Suwa, Jun Watanabe, Chikara Kunisaki, and Itaru Endo have no conflict of interest to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Miles WE (1908) A method of performing abdomino-perineal excision foe rectal carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet 2:1812–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moynihan BG (1908) The surgical treatment of cancer of the sigmoid flexure and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 6:463Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dukes CE (1930) The spread of cancer of the rectum (subsection in a paperby Gordon Watson C & Dukes CE). Br J Surg 17:643–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McElwain JW, Bacon HE, Trimpi HD (1954) Lymph node metastases: experience with aortic ligation of inferior mesenteric artery in cancer of the rectum. Surgery 35:513–531PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kanemitsu Y, Hirai T, Komori K, Kato T (2006) Survival benefit of high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in sigmoid colon or rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 93:609–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chin CC, Yeh CY, Tang R, Changchien CR, Huang WS, Wang JY (2008) The oncologic benefit of high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in the surgical treatment of rectal or sigmoid colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:783–788CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alici A, Kement M, Gezen C, Akin T, Vural S, Okkabaz N, Basturk E, Yegenoglu A, Oncel M (2010) Apical lymph nodes at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery in distal colorectal cancer: an analysis of the risk of tumor involvement and the impact of high ligation on anastomotic integrity. Tech Coloproctol 14:1–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kessler H, Hohenberger W (2013) Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is crucial. World J Surg 37:1789–1798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    West NP, Kobayashi H, Takahashi K, Perrakis A, Weber K, Hohenberger W, Sugihara K, Quirke P (2012) Understanding optimal colonic cancer surgery: comparison of Japanese D3 resection and European complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation. J Clin Oncol 30:1763–1769CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Charan I, Kapoor A, Singhal MK, Jagawat N, Bhavsar D, Jain V, Kumar V, Kuma HS (2015) High ligation of inferior mesenteric artery in left colonic and rectal cancers: lymph node yield and survival benefit. Indian J Surg 77:1103–1107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Surtees P, Ritchie JK, Phillips RKS (1990) High versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 77:618–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Uehara K, Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T, Moriya Y (2007) Impact of upward lymph node dissection on survival rates in advanced lower rectal carcinoma. Dig Surg 24:375–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yasuda K, Kawai K, Ishihara S, Murono K, Otani K, Nishikawa T, Tanaka T, Kiyomatsu T, Hata K, Nozawa H, Yamaguchi H, Aoki S, Mishima H, Maruyama T, Sako A, Watanabe T (2016) Level of arterial ligation in sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg Oncol 14:99CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dworkin MJ, Allen-Mersh TG (1996) Effect of inferior mesenteric artery ligation on blood flow in the marginal artery-dependent sigmoid colon. J Am Coll Surg 183:357–360Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lange MM, Buunen M, van de Velde CJ, Lange JF (2008) Level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery: low tie preferred over high tie. A review. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1139–1145CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Komen N, Slieker J, de Kort P, de Wilt JH, van der Harst E, Coene PP, Gosselink MP, Tetteroo G, de Graaf E, van Beek T, den Toom R, van Bockel W, Verhoef C, Lange JF (2011) High tie versus low tie in rectal surgery: comparison of anastomotic perfusion. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:1075–1078CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bleday R, Garcia-Aguilar J (2007) Surgical treatment of rectal cancer. In: Wolff BG, Fleshman JW, Beck DE, Pemberton JH, Wexner SD (eds) The ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery. Springer, New York, pp 413–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2010) JSCCR Guidelines 2010 for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer. Kanehira-Syuppan, Tokyo, pp 15–76Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Titu LV, Tweedle E, Rooney PS (2008) High tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in curative surgery for left colonic and rectal cancers: a systematic review. Dig Surg 25:148–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hida J, Okuno K (2013) High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in rectal cancer surgery. Surg Today 43:8–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cirocchia R, Trastullia S, Farinella E, Desiderio J, Vettoretto N, Parisi A, Boselli C, Noya G (2012) High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer: a RCT is needed. Surg Oncol 21:e111–e123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sekimoto M, Takemasa I, Mizushima T, Ikeda M, Yamamoto H, Doki Y, Mori M (2011) Laparoscopic lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery. Surg Endosc 25:861–866CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yamamoto M, Okuda J, Tanaka K, Ishii M, Hamamoto H, Uchiyama K (2014) Oncological impact of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy with preservation of the left colic artery for advanced sigmoid and rectosigmoid colon cancer. Dig Surg 31:452–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Japanese Society for Cancer of Colon and Rectum (2006) General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus, 7th edn. Kanehira-Syuppan, Tokyo, pp 6–47Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    The Japan Society of Coloproctology (2009) Specialist system rule [The Japan Society of Coloproctology web site]. Available at: http://www.coloproctology.gr.jp/pdf/200912specialistrules.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2017
  26. 26.
    Mori T, Kimura T, Kitajima M (2010) Skill accreditation system for laparoscopic gastroenterologic surgeons in Japan. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 19:18–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA Physical Status Classification System Available at: http://www.asahq.org/Home/For-Members/Clinical-Information/ASA-Physical-Status-Classification-System. Accessed 25 May 2017
  28. 28.
    International Union Against Cancer. Colon and Rectum (2010) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. New York: Wiley-Liss, pp 143–164Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    National Cancer Institute (2009) Common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4.0. Available at http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm#ctc_40. Accessed 25 May 2017
  30. 30.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tsujinaka S, Kawamura YJ, Tan KY, Mizokami K, Sasaki J, Maeda T, Kuwahara Y, Konishi F, Lefor A (2012) Proximal bowel necrosis after high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal surgery. Scand J Surg 101:21–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rutegård M, Hemmingsson O, Matthiessen P, Rutegård J (2012) High tie in anterior resection for rectal cancer confers no increased risk of anastomotic leakage. Br J Surg 99:127–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gröne J, Koch D, Kreis ME (2015) Impact of intraoperative microperfusion assessment with Pinpoint Perfusion Imaging on surgical management of laparoscopic low rectal and anorectal anastomoses. Colorectal Dis 17:22–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Boni L, Fingerhut A, Marzorati A, Rausei S, Dionigi G, Cassinotti E (2017) Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography during laparoscopic low anterior resection: results of a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 31:1836–1840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wada T, Kawada K, Takahashi R, Yoshitomi M, Hida K, Hasegawa S, Sakai Y (2017) ICG fluorescence imaging for quantitative evaluation of colonic perfusion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 31:4184–4193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bertrand MM, Delmond L, Mazars R, Ripoche J, Macri F, Prudhomme M (2014) Is low tie ligation truly reproducible in colorectal cancer surgery? Anatomical study of the inferior mesenteric artery division branches. Surg Radiol Anat 36:1057–1062CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Patroni A, Bonnet S, Bourillon C, Bruzzi M, Zinzindohoué F, Chevallier JM, Douard R, Berger A (2016) Technical difficulties of left colic artery preservation during left colectomy for colon cancer. Surg Radiol Anat 38:477–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Buunen M, Lange MM, Ditzel M, Kleinrensink GJ, van de Velde CJ, Lange JF (2009) Level of arterial ligation in total mesorectal excision (TME): an anatomical study. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1317–1320CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bonnet S, Berger A, Hentati N, Abid B, Chevallier JM, Wind P, Delmas V, Douard R (2012) High tie versus low tie vascular ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: impact on the gain in colon length and implications on the feasibility of anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 55:515–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Shiomi A, Ito M, Maeda K, Kinugasa Y, Ota M, Yamaue H, Shiozawa M, Horie H, Kuriu Y, Saito N (2015) Effects of a diverting stoma on symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1,014 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg 220:186–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Beppu N, Matsubara N, Noda M, Kimura F, Yamanaka N, Yanagi H, Tomita N (2015) A’high tie’confers an increased risk of anastomotic leakage for lower rectal cancer surgery in patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy. Surg Today 45:600–605CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryInternational University of Health and Welfare, Ichikawa HospitalIchikawaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological CenterYokohama City UniversityYokohamaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineYokohama City UniversityYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations