Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 32, Issue 10, pp 4321–4328 | Cite as

Review of an emergency general surgery process improvement program at a verified military trauma center

  • Joseph BozzayEmail author
  • Matthew Bradley
  • Angela Kindvall
  • Ashley Humphries
  • Elliot Jessie
  • Judy Logeman
  • Jeffrey Bailey
  • Eric Elster
  • Carlos Rodriguez
2018 SAGES Oral



Decreasing combat-based admissions to our military facility have made it difficult to maintain a robust trauma process improvement (PI) program. Since emergency general surgery (EGS) and trauma patients share similarities, we merged the care of our EGS and trauma patients into one acute care surgery (ACS) team. An EGS PI program was developed based on trauma PI principles to facilitate continued identification of opportunities for improvement despite our decline in trauma admissions. Analysis of the first 18 months of combined ACS PI data is presented.


EGS registry inclusion criteria was based on published Association for the Surgery of Trauma’s recommendations. Program components and PI categories were based on our existing trauma PI program. Dedicated coordinators actively reviewed and cataloged patient care and outcomes. Deviations from standard practice patterns, unplanned interventions, and other complications were abstracted, categorized, and evaluated through levels of review similar to accepted trauma PI principles. Data for the first six quarters were collated and trends were analyzed.


Over 18 months, 696 EGS patients met registry inclusion criteria, with 468 patients (67%) undergoing operative intervention. Over the same time, 353 trauma patients were admitted with 158 undergoing operative intervention (56.4%). Of the 696 EGS patients and 353 trauma patients, 226 (32%) and 243 (69%) PI events were identified, respectively. Common events included unplanned therapies, re-admissions, and unplanned ICU admissions. Based on analysis of all events, four new areas for improvement initiatives were identified. Results of these initiatives included implementation of a multi-disciplinary EGS PI committee, consensus protocols, and departmental and hospital-wide actions.


In an 18-month period, integration of our EGS patients into a novel, combined ACS PI program facilitated recognition of an additional 226 PI events and provided a substrate for continued improvements in patient care.


Emergency general surgery Process improvement Quality 


Compliance with ethical standards


Joseph Bozzay, Matthew Bradley, Angela Kindvall, Ashley Humphries, Elliot Jessie, Judy Logeman, Jeffrey Bailey, Eric Elster, and Carlos Rodriguez, have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private ones of the author/speaker and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Department of Defense, the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences or any other agency of the U.S. Government.


  1. 1.
    American College of Surgeons Resources for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient (2014) In: Accessed 8 Jan 2018
  2. 2.
    American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. Accessed 10 Feb 2018
  3. 3.
    Bradley MJ, Kindvall AT, Humphries AE, Jessie EM, Oh JS, Malone DM, Bailey JA, Perdue PW, Elster EA, Rodriguez CJ (2018) Development of an emergency general surgery process improvement program. Patient Saf Surg 12:17. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ingraham AM, Haas B, Cohen ME, Ko CY, Nathens AB (2012) Comparison of hospital performance in trauma vs emergency and elective general surgery. Arch Surg 147:1–8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Frey KP, Egleston BL, Salkever DS, Scharfstein DO (2006) A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med 354:366–378. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ogola GO, Crandall ML, Shafi S (2018) Variations in outcomes of emergency general surgery patients across hospitals: a call to establish emergency general surgery quality improvement program. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 84:280–286. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shafi S, Aboutanos MB, Agarwal S Jr, Brown CVR, Crandall M, Feliciano DV, Guillamondegui O, Haider A, Inaba K, Osler TM, Ross S, Rozycki GS, Tominaga GT (2013) Emergency general surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74:1092–1097. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    American College of Surgeons (2016) American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program operations manual, 2012, 1–171Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Patel SS, Patel MS, Goldfarb M, Ortega A, Ault GT, Kaiser AM, Senagore AJ (2013) Elective versus emergency surgery for ulcerative colitis: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. Am J Surg 205:333–337 (discussion 337-8). CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Havens JM, Peetz AB, Do WS, Cooper Z, Kelly E, Askari R, Reznor G, Salim A (2015) The excess morbidity and mortality of emergency general surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 78:306–311. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sørensen LT, Malaki A, Wille-Jørgensen P, Kallehave F, Kjærgaard J, Hemmingsen U, Møller LN, Jørgensen T (2007) Risk factors for mortality and postoperative complications after gastrointestinal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 11:903–910. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Minami CA, Sheils CR, Bilimoria KY, Johnson JK, Berger ER, Berian JR, Englesbe MJ, Guillamondegui OD, Hines LH, Cofer JB, Flum DR, Thirlby RC, Kazaure HS, Wren SM, O’Leary KJ, Thurk JL, Kennedy GD, Tevis SE, Yang AD (2016) Process improvement in surgery. Curr Probl Surg. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Petersen BT (2014) Quality improvement for the ambulatory surgery center. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 12:911–918. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Freeman RK (2015) The theory, practice, and future of process improvement in general thoracic surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 26:310–316. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morrison CA, Lee TC, Wall MJ, Carrick MM (2009) Use of a trauma service clinical pathway to improve patient outcomes for retained traumatic hemothorax. World J Surg 33:1851–1856. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harvin JA, Kao LS, Liang MK, Adams SD, McNutt MK, Love JD, Moore LJ, Wade CE, Cotton BA, Holcomb JB (2017) Decreasing the use of damage control laparotomy in trauma: a quality improvement project. J Am Coll Surg 225:200–209. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Skarsgard ED, Bedford J, Chan T, Whyte S, Afshar K (2014) ACS national surgical quality improvement program: Targeting quality improvement in Canadian pediatric surgery. J Pediatr Surg 49:682–687. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sarkar B, Brunsvold ME, Cherry-Bukoweic JR, Hemmila MR, Park PK, Raghavendran K, Wahl WL, Wang SC, Napolitano LM (2011) American College of Surgeonsʼ Committee on Trauma performance improvement and patient safety program: maximal impact in a mature trauma center. J Trauma 71:1447–1454. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lucas DJ, Ejaz A, Bischof DA, Schneider EB, Pawlik TM (2014) Variation in readmission by hospital after colorectal cancer surgery. JAMA Surg 149:1272–1276. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prinz A, Colwell JC, Cross HH, Mantel J, Perkins J, Walker CA (2015) Discharge planning for a patient with a new ostomy. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs 42:79–82. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baraza W, Wild J, Barber W, Brown S (2010) Postoperative management after loop ileostomy closure: are we keeping patients in hospital too long? Annals 92:51–55. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tribble DR, Rodriguez CJ (2014) Combat-related invasive fungal wound infections. Curr Fungal Infect Rep 8:277–286. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Loftus TJ, Go KL, Hughes SJ, Croft CA, Smith RS, Efron PA, Moore FA, Brakenridge SC, Mohr AM, Jordan JR (2017) Improved outcomes following implementation of an acute gastrointestinal bleeding multidisciplinary protocol. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 83:41–46. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hall EC, Tyrrell RL, Doyle KE, Scalea TM, Stein DM (2018) Trauma transitional care coordination: a mature system at work. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 84:711–717. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ozao-Choy J, Kim U, Vieux U, Menes TS (2011) Incidental findings on computed tomography scans for acute appendicitis: prevalence, costs, and outcome. Am Surg 77:1502–1509PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leisman DE, Doerfler ME, Ward MF, Masick KD, Wie BJ, Gribben JL, Hamilton E, Klein Z, Bianculli AR, Akerman MB, D’Angelo JK, D’Amore JA (2017) Survival benefit and cost savings from compliance with a simplified 3-hour sepsis bundle in a series of prospective, multisite, observational cohorts. Crit Care Med 45:395–406. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Focht A, Jones AE, Lowe TJ (2009) Early goal-directed therapy: improving mortality and morbidity of sepsis in the emergency department. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 35:186–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Doerfler ME, D’Angelo J, Jacobsen D, Jarrett MP, Kabcenell AI, Masick KD, Parmentier D, Nelson KL, Stier L (2016) Methods for reducing sepsis mortality in emergency departments and inpatient units. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and its text is not subject to copyright protection in the United States; however, its text may be subject to foreign copyright protection 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Walter Reed National Military Medical CenterBethesdaUSA
  2. 2.Naval Medical Research CenterSilver SpringUSA

Personalised recommendations