Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 199–205 | Cite as

A prospective study of the safety and usefulness of a new miniature wide-angle camera: the “BirdView camera system”

  • Yusuke Sumi
  • Hiroyuki EgiEmail author
  • Minoru Hattori
  • Takahisa Suzuki
  • Masakazu Tokunaga
  • Tomohiro Adachi
  • Hiroyuki Sawada
  • Shoichiro Mukai
  • Yuichi Kurita
  • Hideki Ohdan
Article

Abstract

Background

The performance of endoscopic surgery has quickly become widespread as a minimally invasive therapy. However, complications still occur due to technical difficulties. In the present study, we focused on the problem of blind spots, which is one of the several problems that occur during endoscopic surgery and developed “BirdView,” a camera system with a wide field of view, with SHARP Corporation.

Methods

In the present study, we conducted a clinical trial (Phase I) to confirm the safety and usefulness of the BirdView camera system. We herein report the results.

Results

In this study, surgical adverse events were reported in 2 cases (problems with ileus and urination). There were no cases of device failure, damage to the surrounding organs, or mortality.

Conclusions

We evaluated the safety of the BirdView camera system. We believe that this camera system will contribute to the performance safe endoscopic surgery and the execution of robotic surgery, in which operators do not have the benefit of tactile feedback.

Keywords

Endoscopic surgery Laparoscopic surgery Wide-view camera Medical accident Medical safety 

Notes

Acknowledgements

New wide-view minimum camera system was supplied by SHARP corporation.

Author contributions

YS participated in treatment of these patients, literature search, and draft the manuscript. HE participated in treatment of these patients and helped to draft the manuscript. MH helped to do statistical analysis and helped to draft the manuscript. TS, MT, TA, HS, and SM participated in treatment of these patients. YK advised to us as an engineer. HO participated in treatment planning of these patients. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

We jointly developed equipment. SHARP corporation owns the production cost. The test was conducted with the provision of SHARP corporation’s equipment. We have not received funds or reward from SHARP corporation. Drs. Yusuke Sumi, Hiroyuki Egi, Minoru Hattori, Takahisa Suzuki, Masakazu Tokunaga, Tomohiro Adachi, Hiroyuki Sawada, Shoichiro Mukai, Yuichi Kurita, and Hideki Ohdan have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 93877 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E, Group CIS (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yamamoto S, Inomata M, Katayama H, Mizusawa J, Etoh T, Konishi F, Sugihara K, Watanabe M, Moriya Y, Kitano S, Japan Clinical Oncology Group Colorectal Cancer Study G (2014) Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Ann Surg 260:23–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sammour T, Kahokehr A, Srinivasa S, Bissett IP, Hill AG (2011) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is associated with a higher intraoperative complication rate than open surgery. Ann Surg 253:35–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schwartz MJ, Faiena I, Cinman N, Kucharczyk J, Meriggi JS, Waingankar N, Richstone L, Kavoussi LR (2010) Laparoscopic bowel injury in retroperitoneal surgery: current incidence and outcomes. J Urol 184:589–594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kambakamba P, Dindo D, Nocito A, Clavien PA, Seifert B, Schafer M, Hahnloser D (2014) Intraoperative adverse events during laparoscopic colorectal resection–better laparoscopic treatment but unchanged incidence. Lessons learnt from a Swiss multi-institutional analysis of 3,928 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399:297–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tokunaga M, Egi H, Hattori M, Suzuki T, Kawahara T, Ohdan H (2014) Improving performance under mirror-image conditions during laparoscopic surgery using the Broadview camera system. Asian J Endosc Surg 7:17–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anderson O, Davis R, Hanna GB, Vincent CA (2013) Surgical adverse events: a systematic review. Am J Surg 206:253–262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tamadazte B, Agustinos A, Cinquin P, Fiard G, Voros S (2015) Multi-view vision system for laparoscopy surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10:195–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park S, Bergs RA, Eberhart R, Baker L, Fernandez R, Cadeddu JA (2007) Trocar-less instrumentation for laparoscopy: magnetic positioning of intra-abdominal camera and retractor. Ann Surg 245:379–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cadeddu J, Fernandez R, Desai M, Bergs R, Tracy C, Tang SJ, Rao P, Desai M, Scott D (2009) Novel magnetically guided intra-abdominal camera to facilitate laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: initial human experience. Surg Endosc 23:1894–1899CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choi YH, Lee HW, Lee SY, Han DH, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Lee HM, Choi HY, Jeong BC (2016) Laparoendoscopic single-site simple nephrectomy using a magnetic anchoring system in a porcine model. Investig Clin Urol 57:208–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yusuke Sumi
    • 1
  • Hiroyuki Egi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Minoru Hattori
    • 2
  • Takahisa Suzuki
    • 1
  • Masakazu Tokunaga
    • 1
  • Tomohiro Adachi
    • 1
  • Hiroyuki Sawada
    • 1
  • Shoichiro Mukai
    • 1
  • Yuichi Kurita
    • 3
  • Hideki Ohdan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical & Health SciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
  2. 2.Advanced Medical Skills Training Center, Institute of Biomedical & Health SciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
  3. 3.Department of EngineeringHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations