“Underwater” endoscopic submucosal dissection: a novel method for resection in saline with a bipolar needle knife for colorectal epithelial neoplasia
- 494 Downloads
Despite improvements in therapeutic strategy and instrumentation in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), adverse events sometimes occur. Further advancements in available techniques are required to improve procedural success rates and safety. We developed a novel method for ESD in saline, referred to as “underwater” ESD (UESD). UESD involves using a bipolar needle knife and aims to enable complete resection while minimizing thermal damage to the muscle layer. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of this new technique.
This was a retrospective study using data from two referral centers and included 40 lesions diagnosed as colorectal epithelial neoplasia (> 20 mm in diameter or with severe fibrosis) and treated with UESD between December 2015 and March 2017. The main outcome measures were technical success rate, incidence of adverse events, and feasibility of histologic evaluation of the resected specimens.
All 40 lesions, including those with submucosal fibrosis, underwent successful en bloc resection using the UESD technique. No procedural adverse events including perforation, delayed bleeding, and electrocoagulation syndrome were observed, and all patients had an uneventful clinical course associated with UESD. In all cases, UESD provided a resected specimen adequate for histological evaluation, without unwarranted burn effect to the tissues.
Our UESD technique was safe and effective for complete resection of colorectal epithelial neoplasia.
KeywordsEndoscopic submucosal dissection Colorectal cancer Underwater
Compliance with ethical standards
Drs. Shunsuke Yoshii, Tomofumi Akasaka, Yoshito Hayashi, Yoshiki Tsujii, Kengo Nagai, Koji Higashino, Ryu Ishihara, Hideki Iijima, and Tetsuo Takehara have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Video 1. “Underwater” endoscopic submucosal dissection (UESD) procedure for a rectal laterally spreading tumor of granular type, and management of active bleeding underwater (MPG 70394 KB)
Video 2. “Underwater” endoscopic submucosal dissection (UESD) procedure for colorectal epithelial neoplasia in patients with submucosal fibrosis (MPG 37673 KB)
- 1.Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y, Hotta K, Sakamoto N, Ikematsu H, Fukuzawa M, Kobayashi N, Nasu J, Michida T, Yoshida S, Ikehara H, Otake Y, Nakajima T, Matsuda T, Saito D (2010) A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 72:1217–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T, Emura F, Ikehara H, Mashimo Y, Kikuchi T, Fu KI, Sano Y, Saito D (2007) Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 66:966–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.053 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Takeuchi Y, Iishi H, Tanaka S, Saito Y, Ikematsu H, Kudo SE, Sano Y, Hisabe T, Yahagi N, Saitoh Y, Igarashi M, Kobayashi K, Yamano H, Shimizu S, Tsuruta O, Inoue Y, Watanabe T, Nakamura H, Fujii T, Uedo N, Shimokawa T, Ishikawa H, Sugihara K (2014) Factors associated with technical difficulties and adverse events of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: retrospective exploratory factor analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:1275–1284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1947-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Yamashina T, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N, Hamada K, Aoi K, Yamasaki Y, Matsuura N, Kanesaka T, Akasaka T, Yamamoto S, Hanaoka N, Higashino K, Ishihara R, Iishi H (2016) Features of electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasm. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 31:615–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.13052 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Yoshimura R, Adachi T, Funao K, Kobayakawa H, Matsuyama M, Tsuchida K, Takemoto Y, Nakatani T (2006) Treatment of bladder tumors and benign prostatic hyperplasia with a new TUR system using physiological saline as perfusate. World J Surg 30:473–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0258-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Fujiya M, Tanaka K, Dokoshi T, Tominaga M, Ueno N, Inaba Y, Ito T, Moriichi K, Kohgo Y (2015) Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 81:583–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.034 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Leung FW, Amato A, Ell C, Friedland S, Harker JO, Hsieh YH, Leung JW, Mann SK, Paggi S, Pohl J, Radaelli F, Ramirez FC, Siao-Salera R, Terruzzi V (2012) Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 76:657–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.04.467 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Cammarota G, Cesaro P, Cazzato A, Cianci R, Fedeli P, Ojetti V, Certo M, Sparano L, Giovannini S, Larocca LM, Vecchio FM, Gasbarrini G (2009) The water immersion technique is easy to learn for routine use during EGD for duodenal villous evaluation: a single-center 2-year experience. J Clin Gastroenterol 43:244–248. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0b013e318159c654 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Inoue T, Fujii H, Koyama F, Nakamura S, Ueda T, Nishigori N, Kawasaki K, Obara S, Nakamoto T, Uchimoto K, Morita K, Nishikawa T, Ohbayashi C, Nakajima Y (2016) Intraluminal lavage to remove exfoliated tumor cells after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc 30:2773–2778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4550-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar