Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 32, Issue 8, pp 3502–3508 | Cite as

Laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA technique): a step forward in minimally invasive abdominal wall reconstruction for ventral hernia repair (LVHR)

  • Julio Gómez-Menchero
  • Juan Francisco Guadalajara Jurado
  • Juan Manuel Suárez Grau
  • Juan Antonio Bellido Luque
  • Joaquin Luis García Moreno
  • Isaías Alarcón del Agua
  • Salvador Morales-Conde
Article

Abstract

Background

Closing the defect (CD) during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair began to be performed in order to decrease seroma, to improve the functionality of the abdominal wall, and to decrease the bulging effect. However, tension at the incision after CD in large defects is related to an increased rate of pain and recurrence. We present the preliminary results of a new technique for medium midline hernias as an alternative to conventional CD.

Methods

A prospective controlled study was conducted from January 2015 to January 2017 to evaluate an elective new procedure (LIRA) performed on patients with midline ventral hernias (4–10 cm width). The posterior rectus aponeurosis was opened lengthwise around the hernia defect using a laparoscopic approach to create two flaps and was then sutured. The size of the flaps was estimated using a mathematical formula. An on-lay mesh was placed intraperitoneal overlapping the fascia defect. The data analyzed included patient demographics, operative parameters, and complications. A computerized tomography was performed preoperatively and postoperatively (1 month and 1 year) to evaluate recurrence, distance between rectus and seroma.

Results

Twelve patients were included. Mean width of the defect was 5.5 cm. Average VAS (24 h) was 3.9, 1.1 (1 month), and 0 (1 year). Mean preoperative distance between rectus was 5.5 cm; postoperative was 2.2 cm (1 year). Radiological seroma at first month was detected in 50%. Mean follow-up was 15 months.

Conclusion

The LIRA technique could be considered as an alternative to conventional CD or endoscopic component separation for medium defects under 10 cm in width. This technique obtained a “no tension” effect that could be related to a lower rate of postoperative pain with no recurrence or bulging, being a safe, feasible, and reproducible technique.

Keywords

LIRA technique Laparoscopy Ventral hernia Defect closure Incisional hernia Diastasis recti 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosure

Julio Gómez-Menchero, Juan Francisco Guadalajara Jurado, Juan Manuel Suárez Grau, Juan Antonio Bellido Luque, Joaquín  Luis García Moreno, Isaías Alarcón del Agua, and Salvador Morales-Conde have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Höer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2002) Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2893 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years. Chirug 73:474–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    LeBlanc KA, Booth WV (1993) Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3:39–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    LeBlanc KA (2000) Current considerations in laparoscopic incisional and ventral herniorrhaphy. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 4:131–139Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Papanivelu C, Jani KV, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Madhankumar MV, Malladi VK (2007) Laparoscopic sutured closure with mesh reinforcement of incisional hernias. Hernia 11:223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tse GH, Stutchfield BM, Duckworth AD, de Beaux AC, Tulloh B (2010) Pseudo-recurrence following laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. Hernia 14:583–587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Muysoms FE et al (2009) Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 13(4):407–414CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morales-Conde S (2012) A new classification for seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 16(3):261–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morales-Conde S, Cadet H, Cano A, Bustos M, Martín J, Morales-Mendez S (2005) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair without sutures-double crown technique: our experience after 140 cases with a mean follow-up of 40 months. Int Surg 90(3 Suppl):S56-S62Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clavien PA, Barkun J et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zerey M, Heniford BT (2006) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for ventral hernia repair. Which is the best? Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 3(7):372–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marchesi F, Pinna F, Cecchini S, Sarli L, Roncoroni L (2011) Prospective comparison of laparoscopic incisional ventral hernia repair and Chevrel technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:306–310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalt B, Seiler CM, Miserez M (2011) Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD007781Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lomanto D, Iyer SG, Shabbir A, Cheah WK (2006) Laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia mesh repair. A prospective study. Surg Endosc 20:1030–1035CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schroeder AD, Debus ES, Schroeder M, Reinpold WM (2013) Laparoscopic transperitoneal sublay mesh repair: a new technique for the cure of ventral and incisional hernias. Surg Endosc 27:648–654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moore AM, Anderson LN, Chen DC (2016) Laparoscopic stapled sublay repair with self-gripping mesh: a simplified technique for minimally invasive extraperitoneal ventral hernia repair. Surg Technol Int 26:131–139Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schwarz J, Reinpold W, Bittner R (2017) Endoscopic mini/less open sublay technique (EMILOS)-a new technique for ventral hernia repair. Langenbecks Arch Surg 402(1):173–180  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-16-1522-0. Epub 2016 Oct 20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jenkins ED, Melman L, Desai S, Brown SR, Frisella MM, Deeken CR, Matthews BD (2011) Evaluation of intraperitoneal placement of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier coated mesh secured with fibrin sealant in a New Zealand white rabbit model. Surg Endosc 25(2):604–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hollinsky C, Kolbe T, Walter I, Joachim A, Sandberg S, Koch T, Rülicke T, Tuchmann A (2010) Tensile strength and adhesion formation of mesh fixation systems used in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Surg Endosc 24(6):1318–1324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chelala E, Thoma M, Tatete B, Lemye AC, Dessily M, Alle JL (2007) The suturing concept for laparoscopic mesh fixation in ventral and incisional hernia repair: mid-term analysis of 400 cases. Surg Endosc 21(3):391–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Agarwal BB, Agarwal S, Mahajan KC (2009) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: innovative anatomical closure, mesh insertion without 10-mm transmyofascial port, and atraumatic mesh fixation: a preliminary experience of a new technique. Surg Endosc 23:900–905CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Orenstein SB, Dumeer JL, Monteagudo J, Poi MJ, Novitsky YW (2011) Outcomes of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with routine defect closure using “shoelacing” technique. Surg Endosc 25:1452–1457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Clapp ML, Hicks SC, Awad SS, Liang MK (2013) Trans-cutaneous closure of central defects (TCCD) in laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs (LVHR). World J Surg 37:42–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wennergen JE, Askenasy EP, Greenberg JH, Holihan J, Keith J, Liang MK, Martindale RG, Trott S, Plymale M, Roth JS (2016) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary fascial closure vs. bridged repair: a risk-adjusted comparative study. Surg Endosc 30:3231–3238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Suwa K, Okamoto T, Yanaga K (2016) Closure versus non-closure of fascial defect in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature. Surg Today 46:764–773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tandon A, Pathak S, Lyons NJR, Nunes QM, Daniels IR, Smart NJ (2016) Meta-analysis of closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair. BJS 103:1598–1607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bittner R, Bingener-Casey J, Dietz U, Fabian M, Ferzli GS, Fortelny RH et al (2014) International Endohernia Society (IEHS) guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias. International Endohernia Society (IEHS)—part 1. Surg Endosc 28:2–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Christoffersen MW, Brandt E, Helgstrand F, Westen M, Rossenberg J, Kehlet H, Strandfeldt P, Bisgaard T (2015) Recurrence rate after absorbable tack fixation of mesh in laparoscopic incisional hernia. BJS 102:541–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julio Gómez-Menchero
    • 1
    • 4
  • Juan Francisco Guadalajara Jurado
    • 1
  • Juan Manuel Suárez Grau
    • 1
  • Juan Antonio Bellido Luque
    • 2
  • Joaquin Luis García Moreno
    • 1
  • Isaías Alarcón del Agua
    • 3
  • Salvador Morales-Conde
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryRiotinto General HospitalHuelvaSpain
  2. 2.Department of General SurgeryUniversity Hospital “Virgen Macarena”SevilleSpain
  3. 3.Unit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive SurgeryUniversity Hospital “Virgen del Rocio”SevilleSpain
  4. 4.SevilleSpain

Personalised recommendations