Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 32, Issue 8, pp 3480–3485 | Cite as

Expanding indications of robotic thyroidectomy

  • Se Hyun Paek
  • Kyung Ho KangEmail author
  • Sung Jun Park



Robotic thyroidectomy has many advantages with comparable oncologic safety over conventional open surgery in low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer cases. However, there have been few reports on the outcomes of patients who have been treated with robotic thyroidectomy for more advanced thyroid cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of expanding indications of robotic thyroidectomy for more advanced thyroid cancer.


The data of 80 patients with thyroid cancer who underwent robotic total thyroidectomy between January 2013 and December 2014 performed by a single surgeon at Chung-Ang University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 40 patients who had cancer larger than 2 cm or suspicious capsular invasion, or central lymph node (LN) metastasis in preoperative pathologic and radiologic examinations were categorized into the more advanced thyroid cancer group and the remaining patients into the early thyroid cancer group. We compared surgical safety and surgical completeness parameters between the two groups.


The patients in more advanced thyroid cancer group had larger tumors, more extrathyroidal extension, and higher T stages. Surgical safety parameters, such as hypoparathyroidism, vocal cord palsy, and other complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. Surgical completeness parameters, such as the mean number of retrieved LNs, median values of the stimulated thyroglobulin levels, and the proportion of patients with stimulated thyroglobulin levels less than 1 ng/mL, also did not differ significantly.


The outcomes of the patients with more advanced thyroid cancer who were treated with robotic thyroidectomy were comparable to those of the early cancer group patients. Well-designed investigations that are conducted at multiple centers are needed to affirm the validity of expanding indications of robotic thyroidectomy.


Robotic thyroidectomy Expanding indications Surgical safety Surgical completeness 


Compliance with ethical standards


Drs. Se Hyun Paek, Kyung Ho Kang, and Sung Jun Park have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Pellegriti G, Frasca F, Regalbuto C, Squatrito S, Vigneri R (2013) Worldwide increasing incidence of thyroid cancer: update on epidemiology and risk factors. J Cancer Epidemiol. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Olaleye O, Ekrikpo U, Moorthy R, Lyne O, Wiseberg J, Black M, Mitchell D (2011) Increasing incidence of differentiated thyroid cancer in South East England: 1987–2006. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268(6):899–906. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kilfoy BA, Zheng T, Holford TR, Han X, Ward MH, Sjodin A, Zhang Y, Bai Y, Zhu C, Guo GL, Rothman N, Zhang Y (2009) International patterns and trends in thyroid cancer incidence, 1973–2002. Cancer Causes Control 20(5):525–531. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Enewold L, Zhu K, Ron E, Marrogi AJ, Stojadinovic A, Peoples GE, Devesa SS (2009) Rising thyroid cancer incidence in the United States by demographic and tumor characteristics, 1980–2005. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18(3):784–791. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choe JH, Kim SW, Chung KW, Park KS, Han W, Noh DY, Oh SK, Youn YK (2007) Endoscopic thyroidectomy using a new bilateral axillo-breast approach. World J Surg 31(3):601–606. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS, Sung TY, Lee SC, Lee YS, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS (2009) Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients. Surgical endoscopy 23(11):2399–2406. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee KE, Rao J, Youn YK (2009) Endoscopic thyroidectomy with the da Vinci robot system using the bilateral axillary breast approach (BABA) technique: our initial experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19(3):e71–e75. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patel D, Kebebew E (2012) Pros and cons of robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy. Thyroid 22(10):984–985. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuppersmith RB, Salem A, Holsinger FC (2009) Advanced approaches for thyroid surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141(3):340–342. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee J, Kang SW, Jung JJ, Choi UJ, Yun JH, Nam KH, Soh EY, Chung WY (2011) Multicenter study of robotic thyroidectomy: short-term postoperative outcomes and surgeon ergonomic considerations. Ann Surg Oncol 18(9):2538–2547. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bae DS, Koo do H, Choi JY, Kim E, Lee KE, Youn YK (2014) Current status of robotic thyroid surgery in South Korea: a web-based survey. World J Surg 38(10):2632–2639. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sun GH, Peress L, Pynnonen MA (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic vs conventional thyroidectomy approaches for thyroid disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 150(4):520–532. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee KE, Kim E, Koo do H, Choi JY, Kim KH, Youn YK (2013) Robotic thyroidectomy by bilateral axillo-breast approach: review of 1,026 cases and surgical completeness. Surg Endosc 27(8):2955–2962. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Seup Kim B, Kang KH, Park SJ (2015) Robotic modified radical neck dissection by bilateral axillary breast approach for papillary thyroid carcinoma with lateral neck metastasis. Head Neck 37(1):37–45. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee J, Kwon IS, Bae EH, Chung WY (2013) Comparative analysis of oncological outcomes and quality of life after robotic versus conventional open thyroidectomy with modified radical neck dissection in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma and lateral neck node metastases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98(7):2701–2708. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chai YJ, Suh H, Woo JW, Yu HW, Song RY, Kwon H, Lee KE (2017) Surgical safety and oncological completeness of robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid carcinoma larger than 2 cm. Surg Endosc 31(3):1235–1240. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim BS, Kang KH, Kang H, Park SJ (2014) Central neck dissection using a bilateral axillo-breast approach for robotic thyroidectomy: comparison with conventional open procedure after propensity score matching. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24(1):67–72. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee KE, Koo do H, Im HJ, Park SK, Choi JY, Paeng JC, Chung JK, Oh SK, Youn YK (2011) Surgical completeness of bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy: comparison with conventional open thyroidectomy after propensity score matching. Surgery 150(6):1266–1274. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgery, College of MedicineEwha Womans UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryChung-Ang University Hospital and Chung-Ang University College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations