Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 33, Issue 11, pp 3605–3611 | Cite as

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) without laparoscopic assistance for nonampullary duodenal subepithelial lesions: our clinical experience of 32 cases

  • Zhong Ren
  • Sheng-Li Lin
  • Ping-Hong ZhouEmail author
  • Shi-Lun Cai
  • Zhi-Peng Qi
  • Jian Li
  • Li-Qing Yao
Article
  • 172 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Standard treatment for nonampullary duodenal tumors has not yet been established. In case of tumors originated from the muscularis propria (MP) layer and adherent to the serosa layer, the lesions can not be completely removed by ESD. However, with the development of the endoscopic suture technique, endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) of duodenal subepithelial lesions has become possible.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 32 patients with nonampullary duodenal subepithelial lesions who underwent EFTR between February 2012 and January 2017. The suturing method, complications that occurred during and after the operations, perioperative management, tumor characteristics, and pathological findings were analyzed in all patients.

Results

The complete resection rate was 100%; all patients successfully received EFTR except for one patient who required conversion to open surgery. Severe abdominal pain was observed after the operation in one patient who then received laparoscopic exploration, and the possibility of delayed perforation was considered. Another patient showed a decline in blood oxygen saturation (SO2) and was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) for further management. Delayed bleeding and fistula were not observed. All patients achieved complete remission.

Conclusion

EFTR is a safe, minimally invasive treatment modality that ensures complete eradication of the duodenal subepithelial lesions.

Keywords

Nonampullary duodenal subepithelial lesion Endoscopic full-thickness resection Complications 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Drs Zhong Ren, Sheng-Li Lin, Ping-Hong Zhou, Shi-Lun Cai, Zhi-Peng Qi, Jian Li and Li-Qing Yao have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Supplementary material

464_2018_6644_MOESM1_ESM.docx (19 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (MP4 312091 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Gaspar JP, Stelow EB, Wang AY (2016) Approach to the endoscopic resection of duodenal lesions. World J Gastroenterol 22(2):600–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abe N, Takeuchi H, Shibuya M et al (2012) Successful treatment of duodenal carcinoid tumor by laparoscopy-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection with lymphadenectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg 5(2):81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sakon M, Takata M, Seki H et al (2010) A novel combined laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative approach for duodenal lesions. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20(6):555–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Okada K, Fujisaki J, Kasuga A et al (2011) Sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenoma in the natural history of duodenal cancer: a study of follow-up surveillance. Am J Gastroenterol 106(2):357–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abbass R, Rigaux J, Al-Kawas FH (2010) Nonampullary duodenal polyps: characteristics and endoscopic management. Gastrointest Endosc 71(4):754–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ye LP, Zhang Y, Mao XL et al (2014) Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for small upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer. Surg Endosc 28:524–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Waisberg J, Joppert-Netto G, Vasconcellos C et al (2013) Carcinoid tumor of the duodenum: a rare tumor at an unusual site. Case series from a single institution. Arq Gastroenterol 50(1):3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhou PH, Yao LQ, Qin XY et al (2011) Endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance for gastric submucosal tumors originated from the muscularis propria. Surg Endosc 25(9):2926–2931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    American Gastroenterological Association Institute (2006) American Gastroenterological Association Institute medical position statement on the management of gastric subepithelial masses. Gastroenterology 130(7):2215–2216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gao Z, Wang C, Xue Q et al (2017) The cut-off value of tumor size and appropriate timing of follow-up for management of minimal EUS-suspected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. BMC Gastroenterol 17:8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Honda T, Yamamoto H, Osawa H et al (2009) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial duodenal neoplasms. Dig Endosc 21:270–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oka S, Tanaka S, Nagata S et al (2003) Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic resection of early primary nonampullary duodenal carcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol 37:381–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Endo M, Abiko Y, Oana S et al (2010) Usefulness of endoscopic treatment for duodenal adenoma. Dig Endosc 22:360–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Machado NO (2012) Management of duodenal perforation post- endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. When and whom to operate and what factors determine the out- come? A review article. JOP 13:18–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tsujimoto H, Ichikura T, Nagao S et al (2010) Minimally invasive surgery for resection of duodenal carcinoid tumors: endoscopic full-thickness resection under laparoscopic observation. Surg Endosc 24(2):471–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kantsevoy SV, Thuluvath PJ (2012) Successful closure of a chronic refractory gastrocutaneous fistula with a new endoscopic suturing device (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 75(3):688–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ohata K, Murakami M, Yamazaki K et al (2014) Feasibility of endoscopy-assisted laparoscopic full-thickness resection for superficial duodenal neoplasms. Sci World J.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/239627 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    ESMO/European Sarcoma Network Working Group (2014) Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 25(Suppl 3):iii21–i6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Endoscopy Center, Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan HospitalFudan UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations