Advertisement

Staplers vs. loop-ligature: a cost analysis from the hospital payer perspective

  • Richard Hilsden
  • Nadia Khan
  • Kelly Vogt
  • Christopher M. Schlachta
Article

Abstract

Background

Presently, there is equipoise regarding the surgical technique used to manage the appendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy. The purpose of this research was to determine whether the routine use of loop ligature, compared to stapling, is cost effective from a hospital payer perspective.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted amongst patients undergoing emergency laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis at two major academic hospitals. In order to eliminate possible systematic bias arising from one technique being preferentially employed with more complex presentations, patients were divided into study groups based on the technique routinely employed by their surgeon, loop ligature (LLA) versus stapler (LSA). Pediatric patients and open appendectomies were excluded. Costs were determined using a previously published model derived from publicly available data from the Ontario Case Costing Initiative, in conjunction with local cost data for disposable procurement. Secondary outcomes included operating room time, length of stay, and complication rates.

Results

Between Jan 1, 2014 and Dec 31, 2015, 567 adult patients had an emergency laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. In comparing surgeons who routinely employed LLA to LSA, there was a significant decrease in total mean hospital cost with LLA ($1988 ± $143 vs. $2253 ± $99, p = 0.002). In addition, mean disposable cost was reduced for surgeons using LLA ($310 ± $27 vs. $668 ± $26, p < 0.001). This reduction in cost was not associated with a difference in length of stay (1.5 vs. 1.4 days, p = 0.28) or complication rates (8% vs. 10%, p = 0.43).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that surgeons who routinely use loop ligature to secure the appendiceal base during emergency laparoscopic appendectomy offer more cost-effective care compared to stapler users, saving their institution more than $200 per case with no clear disadvantages. A shift from routine use of staplers to loop ligature should result in significant overall cost savings to the hospital.

Keywords

Appendicitis Laparoscopic appendectomy Cost-analysis Endoscopic stapler Loop ligature 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Dr. Richard Hilsden, Dr. Nadia Khan, Dr. Kelly Vogt, or Dr. Christopher M Schlachta have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Britt RC, Weireter LJ, Britt LD (2009) Initial implementation of an acute care surgery model: implications for timeliness of care. J Am Coll Surg 209(4):421–424.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.06.368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Flum DR (2015) Acute appendicitis—appendectomy or the “antibiotics first” strategy. N Engl J Med 372(20):1937–1943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gorter RR, Eker HH, Gorter-Stam MAW, Abis GSA, Acharya A, Ankersmit M et al. (2016) Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015. Surg Endosc 30(11):4668–4690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Partecke LI, Von Bernstorff W, Karrasch A, Cziupka K, Glitsch A, Stier A et al (2010) Unexpected findings on laparoscopy for suspected acute appendicitis: a pro for laparoscopic appendectomy as the standard procedure for acute appendicitis. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 395(8):1069–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frazee RC, Abernathy SW, Davis M, Hendricks JC, Isbell TV, Regner JL et al (2014) Outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy should be the standard of care for uncomplicated appendicitis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76(1):79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rollins MD, Chan KJ, Price RR (2004) Laparoscopy for appendicitis and cholelithiasis during pregnancy: A new standard of care. Surg Endosc Intervent Tech 18(2):237–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, Muhlbaier LH, Peterson ED, Eubanks S et al (2004) Laparoscopic versus open Appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 239(1):43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Pritts TA, Ko CY, Esposito TJ (2010) Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals. Surgery 148(4):625–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sauerland S, Lefering RNE (2004) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:4Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Varela JE, Hinojosa MW, Nguyen NT (2008) Laparoscopy should be the approach of choice for acute appendicitis in the morbidly obese. Am J Surg 196(2):218–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mannu GS, Sudul MK, Bettencourt-Silva JH, Cumber E, Li F, Clark AB et al (2017) Closure methods of the appendix stump for complications during laparoscopic appendectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Porter ME (2010) What Is Value in Health Care? N Engl J Med 363(26):2477–2481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Porter ME, Teisberg EO (2006) Redefining health care: creating value-based competition on results Harvard Bus PressGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schäfer M, Krähenbühl L, Frei E, Büchler MW (2000) Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Switzerland: A Prospective Audit of 2,179 Cases. Dig Surg 17(5):497–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beldi G, Vorburger SA, Bruegger LE, Kocher T, Inderbitzin D, Candinas D (2006) Analysis of stapling versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure. Br J Surg 93(11):1390–1393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bulian DR, Knuth J, Sauerwald A, Ströhlein MA, Lefering R, Ansorg J et al (2013) Appendectomy in germany—an analysis of a nationwide survey 2011/2012. Int J Colorectal Dis 28(1):127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Janson M, Björholt I, Carlsson P, Haglind E, Henriksson M, Lindholm E et al (2004) Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer. Br J Surg 91(4):409–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kazemier G, In’t Hof KH, Saad S, Bonjer HJ, Sauerland S (2006) Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: Evidence for routine stapling? Surg Endosc Intervent Tech 20(9):1473–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Murphy PB, Paskar D, Hilsden R, Koichopolos J, Mele TS (2017) Acute care surgery: a means for providing cost-effective, quality care for gallstone pancreatitis. World J Emerg Surg 12(1):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hilsden R, Vogt K, Gray D, Vinden C, Parry N, Leslie K (2017) Implementation of a high-efficiency operating room in general surgery results in increased throughput while simultaneously decreasing per patient Or costs. Can J Surg 60(4):S127–S128Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chu T, Chandhoke RA, Smith PC, Schwaitzberg SD (2011) The impact of surgeon choice on the cost of performing laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc Intervent Tech 25(4):1187–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Childers CP, Maggard-Gibbons M (2018) Understanding costs of care in the operating room. JAMA Surg 153(4):e176233CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Hilsden
    • 1
    • 4
  • Nadia Khan
    • 2
  • Kelly Vogt
    • 1
    • 3
  • Christopher M. Schlachta
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & DentistryWestern UniversityLondonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & DentistryWestern UniversityLondonCanada
  4. 4.Department of Surgery, London Health Sciences CentreUniversity of Western Ontario, University HospitalLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations