Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 1043–1050 | Cite as

Feasibility of real-time intestinal bloodstream evaluation using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in a porcine intestinal ischemia model

  • Tsuyoshi Takahashi
  • Rie Nakatsuka
  • Hisashi Hara
  • Shigeyoshi Higashi
  • Kouji Tanaka
  • Yasuhiro Miyazaki
  • Tomoki Makino
  • Yukinori Kurokawa
  • Makoto Yamasaki
  • Shuji Takiguchi
  • Masaki Mori
  • Yuichiro Doki
  • Kiyokazu NakajimaEmail author
Dynamic Manuscript

Abstract

Background

Intestinal ischemia can lead to fatal complications if left unrecognized during surgery. The current techniques of intraoperative microvascular assessment remain subjective. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) has the potential to objectively evaluate microvascular blood flow in real-time setting. The present study evaluated the technical feasibility of real-time intestinal bloodstream evaluation using pCLE in a porcine intestinal ischemia model.

Methods

Seven pigs were used. The intestinal ischemia model was prepared by sequentially dividing the mesenteric blood vessels. The intestinal bloodstream was evaluated on its serosal surface using pCLE (Cellvizio 488 probe, Ultra Mini O) at every 1-cm segment from a vessel-preservation border (i.e., the cut end of the vessel). Images of the blood vessels and flow of red blood cells (RBCs) in each visualized vessel were semi-qualitatively assessed using a 3-scale scoring system. In addition, 25 surgeons blindly assessed the 10 movies recorded at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 5 cm from a vessel-preservation border using a 4-scale scoring system to confirm the consistency of the evaluation of the pCLE system.

Results

Images of the blood vessels were successfully obtained from the cut end of the vessel to the segment 4 cm away. Good unidirectional flow of RBCs was observed from the cut end to the 2-cm segment, whereas the flow became bidirectional between 2 and 3 cm segments. Beyond 4 cm, no flow images were obtained. The specimen obtained from the segment beyond 4 cm showed remarkable mucosal color change, which was confirmed as a necrotic change histologically. The evaluations from the cut end of the vessel to the segment 1 cm away by surgeons were excellent or good and it was almost consistent.

Conclusions

Real-time bloodstream evaluation using pCLE is feasible and potentially effective for predicting intestinal ischemia during surgery.

Keywords

Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy Intestinal bloodstream evaluation Intestinal ischemia 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Drs. Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Rie Nakatsuka, Hisashi Hara, Shigeyoshi Higashi, Kouji Tanaka, Yasuhiro Miyazaki, Tomoki Makino, Yukinori Kurokawa, Makoto Yamasaki, Shuji Takiguchi, Masaki Mori, Yuichiro Doki, and Kiyokazu Nakajima have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Supplementary material

The image of blood microvessels was obtained by pCLE on the normal intestine surface immediately after injecting FS, and the diameter was 10 µm. In the blood vessels, we clearly observed RBCs flowing in one direction (MP4 4252 KB)

pCLE images were obtained from the porcine ischemia model on − 5 cm. We get good contrast of vessels and detect RBCs flowing in one direction (MP4 2133 KB)

pCLE images were obtained from the porcine ischemia model on 0 cm. We get good contrast of vessels and detect RBCs flowing in one direction (MP4 1095 KB)

pCLE images were obtained from the porcine ischemia model on 1 cm. We get good contrast of vessels and detect RBCs flowing in one direction (MP4 3067 KB)

pCLE images were obtained from the porcine ischemia model on 2 cm. We get good contrast of vessels and detect RBCs flowing in bidirection (MP4 1835 KB)

pCLE images were obtained from the porcine ischemia model on 3 cm. We get fair contrast of vessels and detect RBCs flowing in bidirection (MP4 3188 KB)

pCLE images were obtained from the porcine ischemia model on 4 cm. We don’t get contrast of vessels and detect RBCs flowing (MP4 5650 KB)

pCLE images were obtained from the porcine ischemia model on 5 cm. We don’t get contrast of vessels and detect RBCs flowing (MP4 2787 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Namikawa T, Uemura S, Kondo N, Yamamoto M, Maeda H, Nishimori H, Sato T, Orihashi K, Kobayashi M, Hanazaki K (2014) Successful preservation of the mesenteric and bowel circulation with treatment for a ruptured superior mesenteric artery aneurysm using the HyperEye Medical System. Am Surg 80:E359–E361PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Handa T, Katare RG, Sasaguri S, Sato T (2009) Preliminary experience for the evaluation of the intraoperative graft patency with real color charge-coupled device camera system: an advanced device for simultaneous capturing of color and near-infrared images during coronary artery bypass graft. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 9:150–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Diana M, Noll E, Diemunsch P, Dallemagne B, Benahmed MA, Agnus V, Soler L, Barry B, Namer IJ, Demartines N, Charles AL, Geny B, Marescaux J (2014) Enhanced-reality video fluorescence: a real-time assessment of intestinal viability. Ann Surg 259:700–707CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Diana M, Agnus V, Halvax P, Liu YY, Dallemagne B, Schlagowski AI, Geny B, Diemunsch P, Lindner V, Marescaux J (2015) Intraoperative fluorescence-based enhanced reality laparoscopic real-time imaging to assess bowel perfusion at the anastomotic site in an experimental model. Br J Surg 102:e169–e176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Namikawa T, Sato T, Hanazaki K (2015) Recent advances in near-infrared fluorescence-guided imaging surgery using indocyanine green. Surg Today 45:1467–1474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wallace MB, Meining A, Canto MI, Fockens P, Miehlke S, Roesch T, Lightdale CJ, Pohl H, Carr-Locke D, Löhr M, Coron E, Filoche B, Giovannini M, Moreau J, Schmidt C, Kiesslich R (2010) The safety of intravenous fluorescein for confocal laser endomicroscopy in the gastrointestinal tract. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 31:548–552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Becker V, van den Broek FJ, Buchner AM, Dekker E, Wallace MB, von Delius S, Schneider A, Schmid RM, Meining A (2011) Optimal fluorescein dose for intravenous application in miniprobe-based confocal laser scanning microscopy in pigs. J Biophoton 4:108–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neumann H, Kiesslich R, Wallace MB, Neurath MF (2010) Confocal laser endomicroscopy: technical advances and clinical applications. Gastroenterology 139:388–392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wallace MB, Fockens P (2009) Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Gastroenterology 136:1509–1513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neumann H, Langner C, Neurath MF, Vieth M (2012) Confocal laser endomicroscopy for diagnosis of Barrett’s Esophagus. Front Oncol. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2012.00042 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bertani H, Pigò F, Dabizzi E, Frazzoni M, Mirante VG, Manno M, Manta R, Conigliaro R (2012) Advances in endoscopic visualization of Barrett’s Esophagus: the role of confocal laser endomicroscopy. Gastroenterol Res Pract. doi: 10.1155/2012/493961 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berzosa M, Wallace MB (2014) Surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus: why biopsy if you can endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 79:222–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bok GH, Jeon SR, Cho JY, Cho JH, Lee WC, Jin SY, Choi IH, Kim HG, Lee TH, Park EJ (2013) The accuracy of probe-based confocal endomicroscopy versus conventional endoscopic biopsies for the diagnosis of superficial gastric neoplasia (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 77:899–908CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jeon SR, Cho WY, Jin SY, Cheon YK, Choi SR, Cho JY (2011) Optical biopsies by confocal endomicroscopy prevent additive endoscopic biopsies before endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric epithelial neoplasias: a prospective, comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc 74:772–780CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guo J, Li C-Q, Li M, Zuo XL, Yu T, Liu JW, Liu J, Kou GJ, Li YQ (2015) Diagnostic value of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy and high-definition virtual chromoendoscopy in early esophageal squamous neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 81:1346–1354CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Canto MI, Anandasabapathy S, Brugge W, Falk GW, Dunbar KB, Zhang Z, Woods K, Almario JA, Schell U, Goldblum J, Maitra A, Montgomery E, Kiesslich R, Trial Group (2014) In vivo endomicroscopy improves detection of Barrett’s esophagus-related neoplasia: a multicenter international randomized controlled trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 79:211–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gómez V, Buchner A, Dekker E, van den Broek FJ, Meining A, Shahid MW, Ghabril MS, Fockens P, Heckman MG, Wallace MB (2010) Interobserver agreement and accuracy among international experts with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in predicting colorectal neoplasia. Endoscopy 42:286–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shahid MW, Buchner AM, Coron E, Woodward TA, Raimondo M, Dekker E, Fockens P, Wallace MB (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in detecting residual colorectal neoplasia after EMR: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 75:525–533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kuiper T, van den Broek F, van Eeden S, Wallace MB, Buchner AM, Meining A, van Hee K, Fockens P, Dekker E (2011) New classification for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in the colon. Endoscopy 43:1076–1081CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meining A, Shah R, Slivka A, Pleskow D, Chuttani R, Stevens PD, Becker V, Chen YK (2012) Classification of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy findings in pancreaticobiliary strictures. Endoscopy 44:251–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hara H, Takahashi T, Nakatsuka R, Higashi S, Naka T, Sumiyama K, Miyazaki Y, Makino T, Kurokawa Y, Yamasaki M, Takiguchi S, Mori M, Doki Y, Nakajima K (2016) A novel approach of optical biopsy using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for peritoneal metastasis. Surg Endosc 115:66–75Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schmidt C, Lautenschläger C, Petzold B, Sakr Y, Marx G, Stallmach A (2013) Confocal laser endomicroscopy reliably detects sepsis-related and treatment-associated changes in intestinal mucosal microcirculation. Br J Anaesth 111:996–1003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fugazza A, Gaiani F, Carra MC, Brunetti F, Lévy M, Sobhani I, Azoulay D, Catena F, de’Angelis GL, de’Angelis N (2017) Confocal laser endomicroscopy in gastrointestinal and pancreatobiliary diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. doi: 10.1155/2016/463868324 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang HY, Wang F, Feng JX (2013) Intestinal microcirculatory dysfunction and neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Chin Med J 126:1771–1778PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Granger DN, Holm L, Kvietys P (2015) The gastrointestinal circulation: physiology and pathophysiology. Compr Physiol 5:1541–1583CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nitori N, Deguchi T, Kubota K, Yoshida M, Kato A, Kojima M, Kadomura T, Okada A, Okamura J, Kobayashi M, Sato T, Beck Y, Kitagawa Y, Kitajima M (2014) Successful treatment of non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) using the HyperEye Medical System™ for intraoperative visualization of the mesenteric and bowel circulation: report of a case. Surg Today 44:359–362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dhoble A, Patel K, Khasnis A (2008) Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia leading to ‘pneumatosis intestinalis’: a series of unfortunate hemodynamic events. Cases J 1:60CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tsuyoshi Takahashi
    • 1
  • Rie Nakatsuka
    • 1
  • Hisashi Hara
    • 1
  • Shigeyoshi Higashi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kouji Tanaka
    • 1
  • Yasuhiro Miyazaki
    • 1
  • Tomoki Makino
    • 1
  • Yukinori Kurokawa
    • 1
  • Makoto Yamasaki
    • 1
  • Shuji Takiguchi
    • 1
  • Masaki Mori
    • 1
  • Yuichiro Doki
    • 1
  • Kiyokazu Nakajima
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineSuitaJapan
  2. 2.Division of Next Generation Endoscopic Intervention, Global Center for Medical Engineering and InformaticsOsaka UniversitySuitaJapan

Personalised recommendations