Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 1892–1900 | Cite as

Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

  • Negar Ahmadi
  • Agnes Crnic
  • Andrew J. Seely
  • Sudhir R. Sundaresan
  • P. James Villeneuve
  • Donna E. Maziak
  • Farid M. Shamji
  • Sebastien Gilbert
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Background

Surgical resection remains a critical component of esophageal cancer treatment with curative-intent. The aim of this study was to compare open (OE) to minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIE) with respect to perioperative and oncologic outcomes.

Methods

Retrospective single-institution review of MIE and OE patients operated between 2001 and 2015 was conducted. Univariable and multivariable models were created using Cox regression. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to compare oncologic outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to compare oncological outcomes in MIE and OE patients.

Results

Of 210 esophageal resection patients, 47% had OE (137/291) and 25% had MIE (73/291). The MIE and OE groups were comparable with respect to patient factors and operative details. Fewer OE patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. MIE was associated with improved lymph node yield, (MIE = 30 [IQR:22–39]; OE = 14 [IQR:7–19], p < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (MIE = 312 mL [100–400]; OE = 657 mL [350–700], p < 0.001), and shorter median length of stay (MIE = 10 days [IQR = 8–14]; OE = 14 days [IQR = 11–22] p < 0.01). The OE group had significantly more adverse events resulting in reoperation or intensive care unit admission (MIE = 21%; OE = 34%; p < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, age and positive resection margins were associated with decreased odds of survival. The number of lymph nodes retrieved, positive resection margins, and pathologic stage were significant predictors of disease-free survival. Analysis of 69 matched pairs showed equivalent median overall survival (MIE = 49 months [18–67]; OE = 29 months [17–69]; p = 0.26) and disease-free survival (MIE = 9 [6–22]; OE = 13 [6–22]; p = 0.45) between the two groups.

Conclusions

Although long-term oncologic outcomes appear to be similar, MIE is associated with significantly less intraoperative blood loss, improved lymph node yield, less risk of severe postoperative adverse events, and shorter length of stay.

Keywords

Esophagectomy Minimally invasive surgery Esophageal cancer Survival Postoperative adverse events 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Disclosure

Negar Ahmadi, Agnes Crnic, Andrew J. Seely, Sudhir R. Sundaresan, P. James Villeneuve, Donna E. Maziak, Farid M. Shamji, and Sebastien Gilbert have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lagergren J, Lagergren P (2013) Recent developments in esophageal adenocarcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 63:232–248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ (2003) Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 349:2241–2252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sihag S, Kosinski AS, Gaissert HA, Wright CD, Schipper PH (2016) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of early surgical outcomes from the society of thoracic surgeons national database. Ann Thorac Surg 101:1281–1288 (discussion 1288–1289)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Swanson SJ, Linden P (2002) Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Minerva Chir 57:795–810PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dolan JP, Kaur T, Diggs BS, Luna RA, Schipper PH, Tieu BH, Sheppard BC, Hunter JG (2013) Impact of comorbidity on outcomes and overall survival after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 27:4094–4103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gao Y, Wang Y, Chen L, Zhao Y (2011) Comparison of open three-field and minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 12:366–369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kinjo Y, Kurita N, Nakamura F, Okabe H, Tanaka E, Kataoka Y, Itami A, Sakai Y, Fukuhara S (2012) Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 26:381–390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kubo N, Ohira M, Yamashita Y, Sakurai K, Toyokawa T, Tanaka H, Muguruma K, Shibutani M, Yamazoe S, Kimura K, Nagahara H, Amano R, Ohtani H, Yashiro M, Maeda K, Hirakawa K (2014) The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Anticancer Res 34:2399–2404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li J, Shen Y, Tan L, Feng M, Wang H, Xi Y, Wang Q (2015) Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer? Surg Endosc 29:925–930CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Noble F, Kelly JJ, Bailey IS, Byrne JP, Underwood TJ (2013) A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 26:263–271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parameswaran R, Veeramootoo D, Krishnadas R, Cooper M, Berrisford R, Wajed S (2009) Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. World J Surg 33:1868–1875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pham TH, Perry KA, Dolan JP, Schipper P, Sukumar M, Sheppard BC, Hunter JG (2010) Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Am J Surg 199:594–598CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sundaram A, Geronimo JC, Willer BL, Hoshino M, Torgersen Z, Juhasz A, Lee TH, Mittal SK (2012) Survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 26:168–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ben-David K, Sarosi GA, Cendan JC, Howard D, Rossidis G, Hochwald SN (2012) Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies. Surg Endosc 26:162–167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JH, Hollmann MW, de Lange ES, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 379:1887–1892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajan PS, Venkatachlam S (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position–experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:7–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, Schauer PR, Close JM, Fernando HC (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238:486–494 (discussion 494–485)PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guo W, Ma X, Yang S, Zhu X, Qin W, Xiang J, Lerut T, Li H (2015) Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes. Surg Endosc 30:3873–3881CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Radtke A, Musholt TJ, Timm S, Rink A, Tsiamis A, Karaliotas C, Lang H (2010) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 55:3031–3040CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Seely AJ, Ivanovic J, Threader J, Al-Hussaini A, Al-Shehab D, Ramsay T, Gilbert S, Maziak DE, Shamji FM, Sundaresan RS (2010) Systematic classification of morbidity and mortality after thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 90:936–942 (discussion 942)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ivanovic J, Al-Hussaini A, Al-Shehab D, Threader J, Villeneuve PJ, Ramsay T, Maziak DE, Gilbert S, Shamji FM, Sundaresan RS, Seely AJ (2011) Evaluating the reliability and reproducibility of the Ottawa Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality classification system. Ann Thorac Surg 91:387–393CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (2010) Esophagus and esophagastric junction. Springer, New York, pp 103–115Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Washington K, Berlin J, Branton P, Burgart LJ, Carter DK, Fitzgibbons P, Frankel WL, Jessup J, Kakar S, Minsky B, Nakhleh R, Tang LH, Compton CC (2013) Protocol for the examination of specimens From Patients With Carcinoma of the Esophagus. http://www.cap.org/ShowProperty?nodePath=/UCMCon/Contribution%20Folders/WebContent/pdf/esophagus-13protocol-3112.pdf. Accessed 5 January 2017
  25. 25.
    Palazzo F, Rosato EL, Chaudhary A, Evans NR 3rd, Sendecki JA, Keith S, Chojnacki KA, Yeo CJ, Berger AC (2015) Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides significant survival advantage compared with open or hybrid esophagectomy for patients with cancers of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. J Am Coll Surg 220:672–679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, Thomas JM (2007) Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 245:232–240CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dantoc M, Cox MR, Eslick GD (2012) Evidence to support the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 147:768–776CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kang CH, Hwang Y, Lee HJ, Park IK, Kim YT (2016) Risk factors for local recurrence and optimal length of esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 102:1074–1080CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Altorki NK, Zhou XK, Stiles B, Port JL, Paul S, Lee PC, Mazumdar M (2008) Total number of resected lymph nodes predicts survival in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 248:221–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Altorki NK, Ancona E, Griffin SM, Holscher A, Lerut T, Law S, Rice TW, Ruol A, van Lanschot JJ, Wong J, DeMeester TR (2008) The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. Ann Surg 248:549–556CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yamashita H, Seto Y, Sano T, Makuuchi H, Ando N, Sasako M (2017) Results of a nation-wide retrospective study of lymphadenectomy for esophagogastric junction carcinoma. Gastric Cancer 20:69–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, Yakoub D, James D, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Moorthy K, Athanasiou T (2010) Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24:1621–1629CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J (1997) Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgery 122:8–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM, Schneider PD, Roberts P, Goodnight JE Jr (2000) Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg 135:920–925CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Division of Thoracic Surgery, The Ottawa HospitalUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  4. 4.The Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteOttawaCanada
  5. 5.Minimally Invasive Aerodigestive Surgery ProgramThe Ottawa HospitalOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations