Multicenter, randomized single-port versus multiport laparoscopic surgery (SIMPLE) trial in colon cancer: an interim analysis
- 290 Downloads
Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) was recently introduced as an innovative minimally invasive surgery method. Retrospective studies have revealed the safety and feasibility of SPLS for colon cancer treatment. However, no prospective randomized trials have been performed. The multicenter, randomized SIMPLE (single-port versus multiport laparoscopic surgery) trial aimed to investigate short-term perioperative outcomes of SPLS for colon cancer treatment, compared with multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS).
Between August 2011 and April 2014, a total of 194 patients with colon cancer were recruited from seven hospitals in Korea. Patients were randomly allocated into the SPLS group (n = 99) or MPLS group (n = 95). The primary endpoint was postoperative complications. Operative, postoperative, and pathologic outcomes were analyzed after 50% of the patient study population had been recruited.
The patients’ demographic characteristics, operative times, estimated blood volume losses, numbers of harvested lymph nodes, and lengths of both resection margins were not significantly different between groups. In the SPLS group, the rates of conversion to MPLS and open surgery were 12.9 and 2.2%, respectively. Postoperative complications occurred in 10.8% of the SPLS, and 12.5% of the MPLS patients (p = 0.714). Times to functional recovery, pain scores, and amounts of analgesia were similar between groups.
The results of this interim analysis suggested that SPLS is technically safe and appropriate when used for radical resection of colon cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01480128).
KeywordsSingle-port Laparoscopy Colon cancer Short-term outcomes Randomized controlled trial
This study was funded by the Korean Society of Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgeons’ research grant (Grant Number D2011-49).
Compliance with ethical standards
Byung Mo Kang, Hyung Jin Kim, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Sang Chul Lee, Kil Yeon Lee, Sun Jin Park, Suk-Hwan Lee, Sang Woo Lim, Yoon Suk Lee, Ji Hoon Kim, Jinkwon Lee, Min Ki Kim, and Jun-Gi Kim have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 2.Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(1008)70310-70313 Epub 72008 Dec 70313 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bagshaw PF, Allardyce RA, Frampton CM, Frizelle FA, Hewett PJ, McMurrick PJ, Rieger NA, Smith JS, Solomon MJ, Stevenson AR (2012) Long-term outcomes of the australasian randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study trial. Ann Surg 256:915–919CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Antoniou SA, Koch OO, Antoniou GA, Lasithiotakis K, Chalkiadakis GE, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2014) Meta-analysis of randomized trials on single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg 207:613–622. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.1007.1045 Epub 2013 Nov 1019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Mereu A, Binda B, Brachini G, Trombetta S (2012) Standard laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: early results of a randomized prospective study. Am J Surg 204:115–120. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.1009.1005 Epub 2011 Dec 1016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Takemasa I, Uemura M, Nishimura J, Mizushima T, Yamamoto H, Ikeda M, Sekimoto M, Doki Y, Mori M (2014) Feasibility of single-site laparoscopic colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: a prospective case-control comparison. Surg Endosc 28:1110–1118. doi: 10.1007/s00464-00013-03284-x Epub 02013 Nov 00468 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196. doi: 10.1097/SLA.1090b1013e3181b1013ca1092 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Chen WT, Chang SC, Chiang HC, Lo WY, Jeng LB, Wu C, Ke TW (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical results. Surg Endosc 25:1887–1892. doi: 10.1007/s00464-00010-01481-00464 Epub 02011 Feb 00427 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Kim CW, Cho MS, Baek SJ, Hur H, Min BS, Kang J, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2015) Oncologic outcomes of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 22:924–930. doi: 10.1245/s10434-10014-14039-10431 Epub 12014 Sep 10439 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar