Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 846–854 | Cite as

Surveillance strategy according to age after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer

  • Hyo-Joon Yang
  • Sang Gyun KimEmail author
  • Joo Hyun Lim
  • Ji Min Choi
  • Sooyeon Oh
  • Jae Yong Park
  • Seung Jun Han
  • Jung Kim
  • Hyunsoo Chung
  • Hyun Chae Jung
Article

Abstract

Background

Whether surveillance strategy after curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) differs in young patients is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of metachronous and extragastric recurrence in young patients with EGC after curative ESD.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 1237 consecutive patients who underwent curative ESD for EGC from 2005 to 2014 at a single tertiary hospital. The patients were divided into group 1 (<50 years of age, n = 86), group 2 (age 50–74, n = 985), or group 3 (≥75 years of age, n = 166). The clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared among the three age groups.

Results

Group 1 had more frequent Helicobacter pylori infection (P < 0.001), less frequent intestinal metaplasia (P = 0.021), and more frequent undifferentiated tumors (P = 0.039). Although the 5-year risk of developing metachronous recurrence appeared to be lower in group 1 (2.7%) than in groups 2 (8.6%) or 3 (8.7%), the risk became quite similar at the 7-year follow-up (6.4, 12.7, and 8.7% for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; P = 0.409 by log-rank test). Extragastric recurrences developed in only 2 cases in group 2 (0.2%).

Conclusions

Surveillance for metachronous and extragastric recurrence after curative ESD in patients <50 years of age should not be different from that in patients ≥50 years of age. Endoscopic surveillance for metachronous recurrence should be continued for longer than 5 years, even in young patients.

Keywords

Early gastric cancer Endoscopic submucosal dissection Surveillance Metachronous gastric cancer Young patients 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Grant from the Promising-Pioneering Researcher Program through Seoul National University in 2015.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Dr. Hyo-Joon Yang, Dr. Sang Gyun Kim, Dr. Joo Hyun Lim, Dr. Ji Min Choi, Dr. Sooyeon Oh, Dr. Jae Yong Park, Dr. Seung Jun Han, Dr. Jung Kim, Dr. Hyunsoo Chung, and Dr. Hyun Chae Jung have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136:E359–E386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Isobe Y, Nashimoto A, Akazawa K, Oda I, Hayashi K, Miyashiro I, Katai H, Tsujitani S, Kodera Y, Seto Y, Kaminishi M (2011) Gastric cancer treatment in Japan: 2008 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry. Gastric Cancer 14:301–316CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ito H, Japanese Elderly Diabetes Intervention Trial Study G (2012) Development of an aging society is a common feature of modern industrialized countries. Preface Geriatr Gerontol Int 12(Suppl 1):5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Matsuda A, Matsuda T, Shibata A, Katanoda K, Sobue T, Nishimoto H, Japan Cancer Surveillance Research G (2014) Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2008: a study of 25 population-based cancer registries for the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project. Jpn J Clin Oncol 44:388–396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anderson WF, Camargo MC, Fraumeni JF Jr, Correa P, Rosenberg PS, Rabkin CS (2010) Age-specific trends in incidence of noncardia gastric cancer in US adults. JAMA 303:1723–1728CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kong X, Wang JL, Chen HM, Fang JY (2012) Comparison of the clinicopathological characteristics of young and elderly patients with gastric carcinoma: a meta analysis. J Surg Oncol 106:346–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kabir A (2016) Role of age in association between gastric cancer and Helicobacter pylori eradication in cases with intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia. Gastric Cancer 19:1023CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Takatsu Y, Hiki N, Nunobe S, Ohashi M, Honda M, Yamaguchi T, Nakajima T, Sano T (2016) Clinicopathological features of gastric cancer in young patients. Gastric Cancer 19:472–478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Japanese Gastric Cancer A (2017) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer 20:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shichijo S, Hirata Y, Niikura R, Hayakawa Y, Yamada A, Ushiku T, Fukayama M, Koike K (2016) Histologic intestinal metaplasia and endoscopic atrophy are predictors of gastric cancer development after Helicobacter pylori eradication. Gastrointest Endosc 84:618–624CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park CH, Lee H, Kim DW, Chung H, Park JC, Shin SK, Hyung WJ, Lee SK, Lee YC, Noh SH (2014) Clinical safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with surgery in elderly patients with early gastric cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 80:599–609CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yoshifuku Y, Oka S, Tanaka S, Sanomura Y, Miwata T, Numata N, Hiyama T, Chayama K (2016) Long-term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in super-elderly patients. Surg Endosc 30:4321–4329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nakamura T, Yao T, Niho Y, Tsuneyoshi M (1999) A clinicopathological study in young patients with gastric carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 71:214–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yoon H, Kim SG, Choi J, Im JP, Kim JS, Kim WH, Jung HC (2013) Risk factors of residual or recurrent tumor in patients with a tumor-positive resection margin after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 27:1561–1568CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kang HY, Kim SG, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS (2010) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for undifferentiated early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 24:509–516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Choi J, Kim SG, Yoon H, Im JP, Kim JS, Kim WH, Jung HC (2014) Eradication of Helicobacter pylori after endoscopic resection of gastric tumors does not reduce incidence of metachronous gastric carcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 12(793):800Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, 3rd edn. Gastric Cancer 14:101–112Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nakamura Y, Yasuoka H, Tsujimoto M, Kurozumi K, Nakahara M, Nakao K, Kakudo K (2006) Importance of lymph vessels in gastric cancer: a prognostic indicator in general and a predictor for lymph node metastasis in early stage cancer. J Clin Pathol 59:77–82CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH, Correa P (1996) Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994. Am J Surg Pathol 20:1161–1181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yang HJ, Kim SG, Lim JH, Choi J, Im JP, Kim JS, Kim WH, Jung HC (2015) Predictors of lymph node metastasis in patients with non-curative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 29:1145–1155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Choi J, Kim SG, Im JP, Kim JS, Jung HC (2015) Long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 29:1223–1230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Min BH, Kim ER, Kim KM, Park CK, Lee JH, Rhee PL, Kim JJ (2015) Surveillance strategy based on the incidence and patterns of recurrence after curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Endoscopy 47:784–793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Abe S, Oda I, Suzuki H, Nonaka S, Yoshinaga S, Nakajima T, Sekiguchi M, Mori G, Taniguchi H, Sekine S, Katai H, Saito Y (2015) Long-term surveillance and treatment outcomes of metachronous gastric cancer occurring after curative endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 47:1113–1118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Choi KS, Jung HY, Choi KD, Lee GH, Song HJ, Kim DH, Lee JH, Kim MY, Kim BS, Oh ST, Yook JH, Jang SJ, Yun SC, Kim SO, Kim JH (2011) EMR versus gastrectomy for intramucosal gastric cancer: comparison of long-term outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 73:942–948CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyo-Joon Yang
    • 1
  • Sang Gyun Kim
    • 2
    Email author
  • Joo Hyun Lim
    • 3
  • Ji Min Choi
    • 3
  • Sooyeon Oh
    • 2
  • Jae Yong Park
    • 2
  • Seung Jun Han
    • 2
  • Jung Kim
    • 2
  • Hyunsoo Chung
    • 2
  • Hyun Chae Jung
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Kangbuk Samsung HospitalSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulKorea
  2. 2.Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research InstituteSeoul National University College of MedicineSeoulKorea
  3. 3.Department of Internal Medicine and Healthcare Research Institute, Healthcare System Gangnam CenterSeoul National University HospitalSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations