Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 643–650 | Cite as

Comparison of pure laparoscopic versus open left hemihepatectomy by multivariate analysis: a retrospective cohort study

  • Hwui-Dong Cho
  • Ki-Hun KimEmail author
  • Shin Hwang
  • Chul-Soo Ahn
  • Deok-Bog Moon
  • Tae-Yong Ha
  • Gi-Won Song
  • Dong-Hwan Jung
  • Gil-Chun Park
  • Sung-Gyu Lee
Article

Abstract

Introduction

To compare the outcomes of pure laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy (LLH) versus open left hemihepatectomy (OLH) for benign and malignant conditions using multivariate analysis.

Materials and methods

All consecutive cases of LLH and OLH between October 2007 and December 2013 in a tertiary referral hospital were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. All surgical procedures were performed by one surgeon. The LLH and OLH groups were compared in terms of patient demographics, preoperative data, clinical perioperative outcomes, and tumor characteristics in patients with malignancy. Multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors associated with severe complications was then performed.

Results

The LLH group (n = 62) had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay than the OLH group (n = 118) (9.53 ± 3.30 vs 14.88 ± 11.36 days, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the OLH group had >4 times the risk of the LLH group in terms of developing severe complications (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥III) (odds ratio 4.294, 95% confidence intervals 1.165–15.832, p = 0.029).

Discussion

LLH was a safe and feasible procedure for selected patients. LLH required shorter hospital stay and resulted in less operative blood loss. Multivariate analysis revealed that LLH was associated with a lower risk of severe complications compared to OLH. The authors suggest that LLH could be a reasonable treatment option for selected patients.

Keywords

Pure laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy Open left hemihepatectomy Comparative study Multivariate analysis 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Hwui-Dong Cho, Ki-Hun Kim, Shin Hwang, Chul-Soo Ahn, Deok-Bog Moon, Tae-Yong Ha, Gi-Won Song, Dong-Hwan Jung, Gil-Chun Park, Sung-Gyu Lee have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Kim K, Jung D, Park K et al (2011) Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor left lateral sectionectomy. Br J Surg 98(9):1302–1308CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reich H, McGlynn F, DeCaprio J, Budin R (1991) Laparoscopic excision of benign liver lesions. Obstet Gynecol 78(5 Pt 2):956–958PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gagner M, Rheault M, Dubuc J (1992) Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumor. Surg Endosc 6(2):99Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lesurtel M, Cherqui D, Laurent A, Tayar C, Fagniez PL (2003) Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic lobectomy: a case-control study. J Am Coll Surg 196(2):236–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abu Hilal M, McPhail MJW, Zeidan B et al (2008) Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy: a comparative study. Ejso-Eur J Surg Oncol 34(12):1285–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aldrighetti L, Pulitano C, Catena M et al (2008) A prospective evaluation of laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 12(3):457–462CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carswell KA, Sagias FG, Murgatroyd B, Rela M, Heaton N, Patel AG (2009) Laparoscopic versus open left lateral segmentectomy. BMC Surg 9:14CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van Dam RM, Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Breukelen G et al (2012) Open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery ERAS® programme (ORANGE II-trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 13(1):54CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dokmak S, Raut V, Aussilhou B et al (2014) Laparoscopic left lateral resection is the gold standard for benign liver lesions: a case–control study. HPB 16(2):183–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dagher I, Di Giuro G, Dubrez J, Lainas P, Smadja C, Franco D (2009) Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy: a comparative study. Am J Surg 198(2):173–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, Lykoudis P, Primrose JN, Pearce NW (2011) Single-centre comparative study of laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 15(5):818–823CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Namgoong J-M, Kim K-H, Park G-C et al (2014) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open left hemihepatectomy for left-sided hepatolithiasis. Int J Med Sci 11(2):127–133CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morise Z, Kawabe N, Kawase J et al (2013) Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with chronic liver disease. World J Hepatol 5(9):487CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yu Y-D, Kim K-H, Jung D-H et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study from a single center. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 399(8):1039–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aldrighetti L, Guzzetti E, Ferla G (2011) Laparoscopic hepatic left lateral sectionectomy using the laparoendoscopic single site approach: evolution of minimally invasive liver surgery. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci 18(1):103–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gkegkes ID, Iavazzo C (2014) Single incision laparoscopic hepatectomy: a systematic review. J Minim Access Surg 10(3):107CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Buell JF, Thomas MJ, Doty TC et al (2004) An initial experience and evolution of laparoscopic hepatic resectional surgery. Surgery 136(4):804–811CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Belli G, Gayet B, Han H-S et al (2013) Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy a consideration for acceptance as standard of care. Surg Endosc 27:2721–2726CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Medbery RL, Chadid TS, Sweeney JF et al (2014) Laparoscopic vs open right hepatectomy: a value-based analysis. J Am Coll Surg 218(5):929–939CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Laurent A, Cherqui D, Lesurtel M, Brunetti F, Tayar C, Fagniez P-L (2003) Laparoscopic liver resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma complicating chronic liver disease. Arch Surg 138(7):763–769CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kaneko H, Takagi S, Otsuka Y et al (2005) Laparoscopic liver resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Surg 189(2):190–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ramirez PT, Wolf JK, Levenback C (2003) Laparoscopic port-site metastases: etiology and prevention. Gynecol Oncol 91(1):179–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schmandra T, Mierdl S, Bauer H, Gutt C, Hanisch E (2002) Transoesophageal echocardiography shows high risk of gas embolism during laparoscopic hepatic resection under carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Br J Surg 89(7):870–876CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of SurgeryUlsan University and Asan Medical CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations