Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 31, Issue 12, pp 5429–5435 | Cite as

Validation of newly developed physical laparoscopy simulator in transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair

  • Yuichi Nishihara
  • Yoh Isobe
  • Yuko Kitagawa
Dynamic Manuscript

Abstract

Background

A realistic simulator for transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair would enhance surgeons’ training experience before they enter the operating theater. The purpose of this study was to create a novel physical simulator for TAPP inguinal hernia repair and obtain surgeons’ opinions regarding its efficacy.

Methods

Our novel TAPP inguinal hernia repair simulator consists of a physical laparoscopy simulator and a handmade organ replica model. The physical laparoscopy simulator was created by three-dimensional (3D) printing technology, and it represents the trunk of the human body and the bendability of the abdominal wall under pneumoperitoneal pressure. The organ replica model was manually created by assembling materials. The TAPP inguinal hernia repair simulator allows for the performance of all procedures required in TAPP inguinal hernia repair. Fifteen general surgeons performed TAPP inguinal hernia repair using our simulator. Their opinions were scored on a 5-point Likert scale.

Results

All participants strongly agreed that the 3D-printed physical simulator and organ replica model were highly useful for TAPP inguinal hernia repair training (median, 5 points) and TAPP inguinal hernia repair education (median, 5 points). They felt that the simulator would be effective for TAPP inguinal hernia repair training before entering the operating theater. All surgeons considered that this simulator should be introduced in the residency curriculum.

Conclusions

We successfully created a physical simulator for TAPP inguinal hernia repair training using 3D printing technology and a handmade organ replica model created with inexpensive, readily accessible materials. Preoperative TAPP inguinal hernia repair training using this simulator and organ replica model may be of benefit in the training of all surgeons. All general surgeons involved in the present study felt that this simulator and organ replica model should be used in their residency curriculum.

Keywords

TAPP 3D printing Surgical education Surgical simulation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all of the participants who voluntarily participated in this study as well as all of the associate developers of the simulator. Funding from the Grant-in-Aid for Epidemiological Research of St. Luke’s International University is gratefully acknowledged.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosure

Yuichi Nishihara received funding from the Grant-in-Aid for Epidemiological Research of St. Luke’s International University and Grant-in-Aid of FASOTEC Co., Ltd. Yoh Isobe received funding from Grant-in-Aid of FASOTEC Co., Ltd. Yuko Kitagawa has no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 91,928 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13:343–403CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reznick RK, MacRae H (2006) Teaching surgical skills: changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 355:2664–2669CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bokeler U, Schwarz J, Bittner R, Zacheja S, Smaxwil C (2013) Teaching and training in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP): impact of the learning curve on patient outcome. Surg Endosc 27:2886–2893CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andresen K, Friis-Andersen H, Rosenberg J (2016) Laparoscopic repair of primary inguinal hernia performed in public hospitals or low-volume centers have increased risk of reoperation for recurrence. Surg Innov 23:142–147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barsness KA, Rooney DM, Davis LM (2013) The development and evaluation of a novel thoracoscopic diaphragmatic hernia repair simulator. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:714–718CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Voitk AJ (1998) The learning curve in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair for the community general surgeon. Can J Surg 41:446–450PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zahiri HR, Park AE, Pugh CM, Vassiliou M, Voeller G (2015) “See one, do one, teach one”: inadequacies of current methods to train surgeons in hernia repair. Surg Endosc 29:2867–2872CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sharma M, Horgan A (2012) Comparison of fresh-frozen cadaver and high-fidelity virtual reality simulator as methods of laparoscopic training. World J Surg 36:1732–1737CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kurashima Y, Feldman L, Al-Sabah S, Kaneva P, Fried G, Vassiliou M (2011) A novel low-cost simulator for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Innov 18:171–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carter J, Duh QY (2011) Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias. World J Surg 35:1519–1525CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abdulzahra Hussain JN, El-Hasani Shamsi (2010) Technical tips following more than 2000 transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of the groin hernia. Surg Endosc 20:384–388Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Trevisonno M, Kaneva P, Watanabe Y, Fried GM, Feldman LS, Lebedeva E, Vassiliou MC (2015) A survey of general surgeons regarding laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: practice patterns, barriers, and educational needs. Hernia 19:719–724CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sugavanam S, Devarajan V (2003) Simulation of a preperitoneal mesh in laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Stud Health Technol Inform 94:343–345PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kurashima Y, Feldman LS, Kaneva PA, Fried GM, Bergman S, Demyttenaere SV, Li C, Vassiliou MC (2014) Simulation-based training improves the operative performance of totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 28:783–788CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sanders AJ, Luursema JM, Warntjes P, Mastboom WJ, Geelkerken RH, Klaase JM, Rodel SG, ten Cate Hoedemaker HO, Kommers PA, Verwey WB, Kunst EE (2006) Validation of open-surgery VR trainer. Stud Health Technol Inform 119:473–476PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lapeer RJ, Gasson P, Florens JL, Laycock S, Karri V (2004) Introducing a novel haptic interface for the planning and simulation of open surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 98:197–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gopalakrishnan G, Devarajan V (2004) StapSim: a virtual reality-based stapling simulator for laparoscopic hemiorrhaphy. Stud Health Technol Inform 98:111–113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chmarra MK, Dankelman J, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, Jansen FW (2008) Force feedback and basic laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 22:2140–2148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Choi YH, Lee HW, Lee SY, Han DH, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Lee HM, Choi HY, Jeong BC (2016) Laparoendoscopic single-site simple nephrectomy using a magnetic anchoring system in a porcine model. Investig Clin Urol 57:208–214CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Majumder A, Fayezizadeh M, Hope WW, Novitsky YW (2016) Evaluation of a novel permanent capped helical coil fastener in a porcine model of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 30(12):5266–5274CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Deeken CR, Matthews BD (2013) Ventralight ST and SorbaFix versus Physiomesh and Securestrap in a porcine model. JSLS 17:549–559CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Panaro F, Matos-Azevedo AM, Fatas JA, Marin J, Navarro F, Zaragoza-Fernandez C (2015) Endoscopic and histological evaluations of a newly designed inguinal hernia mesh implant: experimental studies on porcine animal model and human cadaver. Ann Med Surg 4:172–178 (Lond)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Botden SM, Torab F, Buzink SN, Jakimowicz JJ (2008) The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of virtual reality simulation. Surg Endosc 22:1214–1222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgery, National Hospital OrganizationTokyo Medical CenterTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations