Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 31, Issue 11, pp 4836–4837 | Cite as

Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer using the ligament of Treitz approach

  • Yusuke OmeEmail author
  • Kazuki Hashida
  • Mitsuru Yokota
  • Yoshio Nagahisa
  • Okabe Michio
  • Kazuyuki Kawamoto
Video

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (Lap-DP) for benign lesions or those with low malignant potential has been proven safe and effective, and its performance is now widespread [1, 2, 3]. Lap-DP for left-sided pancreatic cancer (PC) is also being increasingly performed. According to some reports, Lap-DP has superior short-term outcomes (blood loss, postoperative hospital stay) and comparable oncological outcomes and overall survival with those of open distal pancreatectomy (Op-DP) [4, 5, 6]. PC has highly malignant potential; thus, complete resection and sufficient regional lymphadenectomy with tumor-free margins are very important. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) is an accepted standard Op-DP technique for PC and is reportedly useful for achieving R0 resection and radical lymphadenectomy [7, 8, 9, 10]. However, laparoscopic RAMPS (Lap-RAMPS) is not yet popular because of its technical difficulty and lack of adequate evidence. Few reports have described the detailed surgical technique of Lap-RAMPS [11, 12, 13]. We employ Lap-RAMPS using the ligament of Treitz approach with the benefit of a laparoscopic view and herein describe the usability of this laparoscopic procedure with a video.

Methods

Our indication for Lap-RAMPS is left-sided PC located ≥1 cm away from the origin of the splenic artery (SPA) without invasion of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), celiac artery (CA), common hepatic artery (CHA), or portal vein (PV). We apply either anterior or posterior RAMPS to achieve tumor-free margins. Therefore, the left adrenal gland and the nerve plexus around the SMA and CA are resected depending on the extent of the cancer. Three patients underwent Lap-RAMPS for left-sided PC using the ligament of Treitz approach from April to December 2016. This video shows our Lap-RAMPS procedure performed in a 67-year-old man with pancreatic body cancer who was being followed up for autoimmune pancreatitis. The tumor was suspected to have invaded the SPA, splenic vein, and retroperitoneum but was not close to the SMA, CA, CHA, or PV. The patient was put in the supine position with his legs opened, and the operation was performed using five trocars. Early in the operation, we incised the retroperitoneum just beside the ligament of Treitz, and the inferior vena cava and left renal vein (LRV) were exposed with resection of Gerota’s fascia under a good laparoscopic view. The left adrenal gland was resected in this case to obtain sufficient tumor-free margins. The origin of the SMA was easily identified above the LRV. The most posterior dissection was carried out early in the operation, making it easy and safe to determine the resected margin and enabling curative resection with sufficient regional lymphadenectomy. After division of the pancreas with a linear stapler, the lymph nodes around the SMA and CA were safely removed.

Results

The operative time was 358 min, and the estimated blood loss was 1 ml. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 10. Pathological examination revealed invasive ductal carcinoma (stage III, T3N1M0 according to the 7th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control system) with tumor-free margins. In all three patients, the median operative time and blood loss were 358 (328–451) min and minimal (minimal to 1 ml). One patient underwent anterior RAMPS and the other two patients, including the case mentioned above, underwent posterior RAMPS. One patient developed a grade B pancreatic fistula according to the International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification, but he recovered promptly with conservative treatment. No life-threatening complications occurred. The median postoperative hospital stay was 14 (10–16) days.

Conclusions

Lap-RAMPS using the ligament of Treitz approach is feasible and extremely helpful in performing minimally invasive, curative resection for well-selected left-sided PC.

Keywords

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy RAMPS Pancreatic cancer 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Drs. Yusuke Ome, Kazuki Hashida, Mitsuru Yokota, Yoshio Nagahisa, Michio Okabe, Taebum Park, and Kazuyuki Kawamoto have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Supplementary material

464_2017_5561_MOESM1_ESM.mpg (341.8 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (MPG 350030 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Pericleous S, Middleton N, McKay SC, Bowers KA, Hutchins RR (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-matched studies comparing open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: is it a safe procedure? Pancreas 41:993–1000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Venkat R, Edil BH, Schulick RD, Lidor AO, Makary MA, Wolfgang CL (2012) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 255:1048–1059CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nakamura M, Wakabayashi G, Miyasaka Y, Tanaka M, Morikawa T, Unno M, Tajima H, Kumamoto Y, Satoi S, Kwon M, Toyama H, Ku Y, Yoshitomi H, Nara S, Shimada K, Yokoyama T, Miyagawa S, Toyama Y, Yanaga K, Fujii T, Kodera Y, Tomiyama Y, Miyata H, Takahara T, Beppu T, Yamaue H, Miyazaki M, Takada T (2015) Multicenter comparative study of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy using propensity score-matching. J␣Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22:731–736CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ricci C, Casadei R, Taffurelli G, Toscano F, Pacilio CA, Bogoni S, D’Ambra M, Pagano N, Di Marco MC, Minni F (2015) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J␣Gastrointest Surg 19:770–781CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shin SH, Kim SC, Song KB, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Lee D, Lee JW, Jun E, Park KM, Lee YJ (2015) A comparative study of laparoscopic vs. open distal pancreatectomy for left-sided ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. J␣Am Coll Surg 220:177–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sharpe SM, Talamonti MS, Wang E, Bentrem DJ, Roggin KK, Prinz RA, Marsh RD, Stocker SJ, Winchester DJ, Baker MS (2015) The laparoscopic approach to distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma results in shorter lengths of stay without compromising oncologic outcomes. Am J Surg 209:557–563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D (2003) Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Surgery 133:521–527CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2007) Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins. J␣Am Coll Surg 204:244–249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mitchem JB, Hamilton N, Gao F, Hawkins WG, Linehan DC, Strasberg SM (2012) Long-term results of resection of adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas using radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure. J␣Am Coll Surg 214:46–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grossman JG, Fields RC, Hawkins WG, Strasberg SM (2016) Single institution results of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of pancreas in 78 patients. J␣Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 23:432–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Choi SH, Kang CM, Lee WJ, Chi HS (2011) Laparoscopic modified anterior RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer: technical feasibility and interim results. Surg Endosc 25:2360–2361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sunagawa H, Harumatsu T, Kinjo S, Oshiro N (2014) Ligament of Treitz approach in laparoscopic modified radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: report of three cases. Asian J Endosc Surg 7:172–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim EY, Hong TH (2017) Initial experience with laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer in a single institution: technical aspects and oncological outcomes. BMC Surg. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0200-z Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryKurashiki Central HospitalKurashikiJapan

Personalised recommendations