Preoperative localization of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 680 Downloads
Preoperative colorectal tumor localization is crucial for appropriate resection and treatment planning. As the localization accuracy of conventional colonoscopy is considered to be low, several localization techniques have been developed. We systematically reviewed the tumor localization error rates of several preoperative endoscopic techniques and synthesized information on risk factors for localization errors and procedure-related adverse events.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the grey literature were searched. Studies were included if they reported tumor localization errors in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing resection with curative intent. Using random-effects models, pooled incidence of tumor localization errors were derived for conventional colonoscopy and colonoscopic tattooing. Due to the lack of comparative studies, a direct comparison of the pooled estimates was performed. Procedure-related adverse events, risk factors for localization errors, and the localization outcomes of other techniques such as colonoscopic clip placement, radioguided occult colonic lesion identification, and the use of magnetic endoscope imaging were also synthesized.
A total of 38 non-randomized controlled and observational studies were included in this review (2578 patients underwent conventional colonoscopy and 643 colonoscopic tattooing). The pooled incidence of localization errors with conventional colonoscopy was 15.4 % (95 % CI 12.0–18.7), whereas that of colonoscopic tattooing was 9.5 % (95 % CI 5.7–13.3), mean difference 5.9 % (95 % CI 0.65–11.14, p = 0.03). Adverse events secondary to tattooing were infrequent, and most were cases of ink spillage. Limited information was available for other localization techniques.
Conventional colonoscopy has a higher incidence of localization error compared to colonoscopic tattooing for localization of colorectal cancer. Colonoscopic tattooing is safe and leads to fewer tumor localization errors. Given the widespread adoption of laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer, routine colonoscopic tattooing should be adopted. However, studies directly comparing different localization techniques are needed.
KeywordsColonoscopy Colorectal neoplasms Colorectal surgery Preoperative procedures Laparoscopy
We would like to thank the Information Specialist, Christine Neilson, at the Scotia Bank Health Sciences Library, Li Ki Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, for performing the search presented in this systematic review. We would also like to thank Dr. Fady Saleh for her help in providing data used in this manuscript. Prakesh Shah is supported by an Applied Research Chair in Reproductive and Child Health Services and Policy Research from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Dr. Prakesh Shah is supported by an Applied Research Chair in Reproductive and Child Health Services and Policy Research from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Maryam Elmi, Sergio Acuna, Prakesh Shah, Natalie Coburn, and Fayez Quereshy contributed to the study conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data, critical revision, and final approval. Maryam Elmi and Sergio Acuna acquired the data and drafted the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Sergio A. Acuna, Maryam Elmi, Prakesh S. Shah, Natalie G. Coburn, and Fayez A. Quereshy have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 13.Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group, Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10(1):44–52. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Sammour T, Jones IT, Gibbs P, Chandra R, Steel MC, Shedda SM, Croxford M, Faragher I, Hayes IP, Hastie IA (2015) Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer: analysis of a large prospective clinical database. J Surg Oncol. doi: 10.1002/jso.23893 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, Group COcLoORS (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70221-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E, Group CIS (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(14):1324–1332. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414882 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ, Group COcLoORIS (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14(3):210–218. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ, Meijer DW, Buunen M, Jeekel J, Anderberg B, Cuesta MA, Cuschierl A, Fingerhut A, Fleshman JW, Guillou PJ, Haglind E, Himpens J, Jacobi CA, Jakimowicz JJ, Koeckerling F, Lacy AM, Lezoche E, Monson JR, Morino M, Neugebauer E, Wexner SD, Whelan RL, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18(8):1163–1185. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8253-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series Studies (2014) National Institute of Health—National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/in-develop/cardiovascular-risk-reduction/tools/case_series
- 34.Feuerlein S, Grimm LJ, Davenport MS, Haystead CM, Miller CM, Neville AM, Jaffe TA (2012) Can the localization of primary colonic tumors be improved by staging CT without specific bowel preparation compared to optical colonoscopy? Eur J Radiol 81(10):2538–2542. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.12.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37.Arteaga-Gonzalez I, Martin-Malagon A, Fernandez EM, Arranz-Duran J, Parra-Blanco A, Nicolas-Perez D, Quintero-Carrion E, Luis HD, Carrillo-Pallares A (2006) The use of preoperative endoscopic tattooing in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery for endoscopically advanced tumors: a prospective comparative clinical study. World J Surg 30(4):605–611CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 46.Park JW, Sohn DK, Hong CW, Han KS, Choi DH, Chang HJ, Lim SB, Choi HS, Jeong SY (2008) The usefulness of preoperative colonoscopic tattooing using a saline test injection method with prepackaged sterile India ink for localization in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 22(2):501–505CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 51.Fu KI, Fujii T, Kato S, Sano Y, Koba I, Mera K, Saito H, Yoshino T, Sugito M, Yoshida S (2001) A new endoscopic tattooing technique for identifying the location of colonic lesions during laparoscopic surgery: a comparison with the conventional technique. Endoscopy 33(8):687–691CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 56.Keum B, Seo M, Park SC, Choi HS, Kim ES, Jeen YT, Lee HS, Chun HJ, Um SH, Kim CD, Ryu HS, Kim J (2013) A novel marking technique with magnetic clip on laparoscopic colon tumor operation: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 1:AB450Google Scholar
- 60.Hoff G, Bretthauer M, Dahler S, Huppertz-Hauss G, Sauar J, Paulsen J, Seip B, Moritz V (2007) Improvement in caecal intubation rate and pain reduction by using 3-dimensional magnetic imaging for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized trial of patients referred for colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 42(7):885–889. doi: 10.1080/00365520601127125 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 69.Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D, Davis W, Bosworth HB, Sanders L, Yee J, Henderson J, Hatten P, Burdick S, Sanyal A, Rubin DT, Sterling M, Akerkar G, Bhutani MS, Binmoeller K, Garvie J, Bini EJ, McQuaid K, Foster WL, Thompson WM, Dachman A, Halvorsen R (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365(9456):305–311. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17784-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 70.Rosman AS, Korsten MA (2007) Meta-analysis comparing CT colonography, air contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy. Am J Med 120(3):203–210 e204. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.05.061