Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 2340–2349 | Cite as

Technical feasibility and safety of laparoscopic right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma following sequential TACE–PVE: a comparative study

  • Claire GoumardEmail author
  • Shohei Komatsu
  • Raffaele Brustia
  • Laëtitia Fartoux
  • Olivier Soubrane
  • Olivier Scatton
Dynamic Manuscript



Major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ideally involves preoperative portal venous embolization (PVE) coupled with preoperative transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) to improve postoperative course and oncological results. Laparoscopic right hepatectomy (RH) following sequential TACE–PVE for HCC, although challenging, may help improve both immediate and long-term patient outcomes. This study is the first to describe and compare laparoscopic to open RH following sequential TACE–PVE for HCC in terms of feasibility, safety, and patient outcomes.

Study design

All patients who underwent laparoscopic RH following successful TACE–PVE sequence (video provided) were retrospectively reviewed from a prospective database maintained at our center. Preoperative characteristics, operative data, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed and compared with those of patients who underwent open RH after TACE–PVE sequence during the same period.


The laparoscopic and open RH groups each included 16 patients. F3 or F4 fibrosis was present in 81 % of patients. The conversion rate was 25 %. The 90-day postoperative complication rate was 25 % in the laparoscopic group versus 50 % in the open group (p = 0.27). The incidence of postoperative liver failure grade B was higher in the open group than in the laparoscopic group (5 vs. 0 patients, p = 0.043). Severe complications, Clavien grade ≥ IIIb, only occurred in the open group and included one postoperative death. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (7 vs. 12 days, p = 0.001). R0 resection was accomplished in 93.8 % of laparoscopic patients.


Laparoscopic approach seems technically feasible and safe. This modern approach may optimize the surgical strategy in the future of HCC management.


Hepatocellular carcinoma Laparoscopic liver resection Right hepatectomy Transarterial chemoembolization 


Compliance with ethical standards


Drs. Claire Goumard, Shohei Komatsu, Raffaele Brustia, Laëtitia Fartoux, Olivier Soubrane, and Olivier Scatton declare they have no conflict of interest or any financial ties to disclose.

Supplementary material

Laparoscopic right hepatectomy following TACE–PVE: video selection (MOV 381432 kb)


  1. 1.
    European Association for the Study of the Liver, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (2012) EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 56(4):908–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abulkhir A, Limongelli P, Healey AJ, Damrah O, Tait P, Jackson J et al (2008) Preoperative portal vein embolization for major liver resection: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 247(1):49–57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Palavecino M, Chun YS, Madoff DC, Zorzi D, Kishi Y, Kaseb AO et al (2009) Major hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with or without portal vein embolization: perioperative outcome and survival. Surgery 145(4):399–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shindoh J, Tzeng C-WD, Vauthey J-N (2012) Portal vein embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer 1(3–4):159–167CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ogata S, Belghiti J, Farges O, Varma D, Sibert A, Vilgrain V (2006) Sequential arterial and portal vein embolizations before right hepatectomy in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 93(9):1091–1098CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Llovet JM, Real MI, Montaña X, Planas R, Coll S, Aponte J et al (2002) Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359(9319):1734–1739CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pang YY (2000) The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2:333–339 (HPB. 2002;4(2):99; author reply 99–100) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tzanis D, Shivathirthan N, Laurent A, Abu Hilal M, Soubrane O, Kazaryan AM et al (2013) European experience of laparoscopic major hepatectomy. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci 20(2):120–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tranchart H, Di Giuro G, Lainas P, Roudie J, Agostini H, Franco D et al (2010) Laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched-pair comparative study. Surg Endosc 24(5):1170–1176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Belli G, Limongelli P, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Cioffi L, Belli A et al (2009) Laparoscopic and open treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Br J Surg 96(9):1041–1048CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ker CG, Chen JS, Kuo KK, Chuang SC, Wang SJ, Chang WC et al (2011) Liver surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma: laparoscopic versus open approach. Int J Hepatol. 2011:596792CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Soubrane O, Goumard C, Laurent A, Tranchart H, Truant S, Gayet B et al (2014) Laparoscopic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a French survey in 351 patients. HPB 16(4):357–365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hwang DW, Han H-S, Yoon Y-S, Cho JY, Kwon Y, Kim JH et al (2013) Laparoscopic major liver resection in Korea: a multicenter study. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci 20(2):125–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Soubrane O, Schwarz L, Cauchy F, Perotto LO, Brustia R, Bernard D et al (2015) A conceptual technique for laparoscopic right hepatectomy based on facts and oncologic principles: the caudal approach. Ann Surg 261(6):1226–1231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aoki T, Imamura H, Hasegawa K, Matsukura A, Sano K, Sugawara Y et al (2004) Sequential preoperative arterial and portal venous embolizations in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Arch Surg 139(7):766–774CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Brooke-Smith M, Crawford M, Adam R et al (2011) Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the international study group of liver surgery (ISGLS). Surgery 149(5):713–724CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Croome KP, Yamashita MH (2010) Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resection for benign and malignant tumors: an updated meta-analysis. Arch Surg 145(11):1109–1118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xiong J-J, Altaf K, Javed MA, Huang W, Mukherjee R, Mai G et al (2012) Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 18(45):6657–6668CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yin Z, Fan X, Ye H, Yin D, Wang J (2013) Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 20(4):1203–1215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wu CC, Yeh DC, Lin MC, Liu TJ, P’Eng FK (2001) Improving operative safety for cirrhotic liver resection. Br J Surg 88(2):210–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cannon RM, Saggi B, Buell JF (2014) Evaluation of a laparoscopic liver resection in the setting of cirrhosis. HPB 16(2):164–169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dokmak S, Ftériche FS, Borscheid R, Cauchy F, Farges O, Belghiti J (2013) 2012 Liver resections in the 21st century: we are far from zero mortality. HPB 15(11):908–915CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wong TCL, Cheung TT, Chok KSH, Chan ACY, Dai WC, Chan SC et al (2014) Treatment strategy to improve long-term survival for hepatocellular carcinoma smaller than 5 cm: major hepatectomy versus minor hepatectomy. World J Surg 38(9):2386–2394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cescon M, Vetrone G, Grazi GL, Ramacciato G, Ercolani G, Ravaioli M et al (2009) Trends in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1500 consecutive unselected cases over 20 years. Ann Surg 249(6):995–1002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Abecassis MM, Fisher RA, Olthoff KM, Freise CE, Rodrigo DR, Samstein B et al (2012) Complications of living donor hepatic lobectomy: a comprehensive report. Am J Transpl 12(5):1208–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Andreou A, Vauthey J-N, Cherqui D, Zimmitti G, Ribero D, Truty MJ et al (2013) Improved long-term survival after major resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter analysis based on a new definition of major hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 17(1):66–77 (discussion p. 77) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fuks D, Cauchy F, Ftériche S, Nomi T, Schwarz L, Dokmak S et al (2015) Laparoscopy decreases pulmonary complications in patients undergoing major liver resection: a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg 263(2):353–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250(5):831–841CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ariizumi S-I, Kotera Y, Takahashi Y, Katagiri S, Yamamoto M (2013) Impact of hepatectomy for huge solitary hepatocellular carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 107(4):408–413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rao A, Rao G, Ahmed I (2012) Laparoscopic or open liver resection? Let systematic review decide it. Am J Surg 204(2):222–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP, UPMCPitié-Salpêtrière HospitalParisFrance
  2. 2.Department of Hepatology, AP-HP, UPMCPitié-Salpêtrière HospitalParisFrance
  3. 3.Department of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HPBeaujon HospitalClichyFrance

Personalised recommendations