Factors predicting outcome from enhanced recovery programmes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review
- 1.3k Downloads
To perform a systematic review of published literature for the factors reported to predict outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes following laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
ERAS programmes and the use of laparoscopy have been widely adopted in colorectal surgery bringing short-term patient benefit. However, there is a minority of patients that do not benefit from these strategies and their identification is not well characterised. The factors that underpin outcomes from ERAS programmes for laparoscopic patients are not understood.
A systematic search of the MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify suitable articles published between 2000 and 2015. The search strategy captured terms for ERAS, colorectal resection, prediction and outcome measures.
Thirty-four studies containing 10,861 laparoscopic resections were included. Thirty-one (91 %) studies were confined to elective cases. Predictive analysis of outcome was most frequently based on length of stay (LOS), morbidity and readmission which were the main outcome measures of 29 (85 %), 26 (76 %) and 18 (53 %) of the included studies, respectively. Forty-seven percentage of included studies investigated the impact of ERAS programme compliance on these outcomes. Reduced protocol compliance was the most frequently identified modifiable predictive factor for adverse LOS, morbidity and readmission.
Protocol compliance is the most frequently reported predictive factor for outcomes of ERAS programmes following laparoscopic colorectal resection. Reduced compliance increases LOS, morbidity and readmission to hospital. The impact of compliance with individual ERAS protocol elements is insufficiently studied, and the lack of a standardised framework for evaluating ERAS programmes makes it difficult to draw definite conclusions about which factors exert the greatest impact on outcome after laparoscopic colorectal resection.
KeywordsEnhanced recovery ERAS Outcome Prediction Colorectal
Compliance with ethical standards
David E. Messenger, Nathan J. Curtis, Adam Jones, Emma L. Jones, Neil J. Smart and Nader K. Francis have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 2.The UK National Bowel Cancer Audit Project 2015 (2015) Health and Social Care Information CentreGoogle Scholar
- 3.ERAS Society—Reference Centres Interactive Audit. 2016. 14-7-2016. Ref Type: Online SourceGoogle Scholar
- 5.Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Hammel J, Fazio VW (2003) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 46(7):851–859CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Ren L, Zhu D, Wei Y, Pan X, Liang L, Xu J et al (2012) Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program attenuates stress and accelerates recovery in patients after radical resection for colorectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 36(2):407–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD007635Google Scholar
- 22.Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, Engel AF et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254(6):868–875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Keller DS, Delaney CP, Hashemi L, Haas EM (2015) A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4732-6
- 37.Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Stone JAC (2011) Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 5.1.0 ed. The Cochrane CollaborationGoogle Scholar
- 42.Wongyingsinn M, Baldini G, Charlebois P, Liberman S, Stein B, Carli F (2011) Intravenous lidocaine versus thoracic epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery using an enhanced recovery program. Reg Anesth Pain Med 36(3):241–248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 43.Wongyingsinn M, Baldini G, Stein B, Charlebois P, Liberman S, Carli F (2012) Spinal analgesia for laparoscopic colonic resection using an enhanced recovery after surgery programme: better analgesia, but no benefits on postoperative recovery: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 108(5):850–856CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 48.Loftus TJ, Stelton S, Efaw BW, Bloomstone J (2015) A system-wide enhanced recovery program focusing on two key process steps reduces complications and readmissions in patients undergoing bowel surgery. J Healthc Qual. doi: 10.1111/jhq.12068
- 75.Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003145Google Scholar
- 81.OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. 4-3-2015. University of Oxford. Ref Type: Online SourceGoogle Scholar