Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 594–601 | Cite as

Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for evaluating the submucosal invasion of colorectal neoplasms

  • Bun Kim
  • Yon Hee Kim
  • Soo Jung Park
  • Jae Hee Cheon
  • Tae Il Kim
  • Won Ho Kim
  • Hoguen Kim
  • Sung Pil HongEmail author
Article

Abstract

Background

Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) is a novel method for in vivo histological analysis of colorectal neoplasm mucosa, which provides meaningful information for the development of adequate therapeutic strategies. However, the in vivo histology of colorectal neoplasm submucosa has not been studied. We assessed the feasibility and safety of pCLE for evaluating colorectal submucosa, and identified and validated diagnostic criteria for submucosal carcinoma infiltration.

Methods

From March to July 2014, 83 pCLE videos of 51 lesions in 31 patients who underwent scheduled colonoscopic procedures for the removal of colorectal neoplasms were acquired consecutively. During the procedures, pCLE videos of the lesions and biopsy samples for histopathological analysis were acquired. Final histopathological results were used as the gold standard.

Results

Based on the confocal pattern, we classified colorectal submucosa findings as negative (superficial submucosa, deep submucosa, and submucosa with fibrosis) or indicative of carcinoma infiltration. Dark and irregular cell nests with irregular cell architecture and little or no mucin were seen in submucosal carcinoma infiltration. Based on rates of correlation with pathological findings, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the classification of submucosal carcinoma infiltration by two observers were 91.7, 86.8, and 88.0 %, respectively. In addition, the results showed good interobserver agreement for the detection of submucosal carcinoma infiltration (κ = 0.757, standard error = 0.102). No adverse events occurred during the procedures.

Conclusions

Submucosa assessment by pCLE is feasible and safe. pCLE is useful for the differentiation of normal submucosa from carcinoma infiltration, particularly when infiltration is accompanied by severe fibrosis. Large-scale prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the clinical impact of the use of pCLE during endoscopy.

Keywords

Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy Submucosa Colorectal neoplasm 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a research grant from Health and Medical Technology R&D Program (HI10C2020), Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea.

Disclosures

Drs. Bun Kim, Yon Hee Kim, Soo Jung Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim, Won Ho Kim, Hoguen Kim, and Sung Pil Hong have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea, was not directly involved in the study design, data acquisition/interpretation, or manuscript preparation or review.

Supplementary material

464_2016_5003_MOESM1_ESM.mpg (630 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (MPG 630 kb)
464_2016_5003_MOESM2_ESM.mpg (766 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (MPG 766 kb)
464_2016_5003_MOESM3_ESM.mpg (576 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (MPG 576 kb)
464_2016_5003_MOESM4_ESM.mpg (708 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (MPG 708 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Bergmann U, Beger HG (2003) Endoscopic mucosal resection for advanced non-polypoid colorectal adenoma and early stage carcinoma. Surg Endosc 17(3):475–479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF, Brown G, Tam W, Singh R, Zanati S, Chen RY, Byth K (2011) Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 140(7):1909–1918CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Repici A, Pellicano R, Strangio G, Danese S, Fagoonee S, Malesci A (2009) Endoscopic mucosal resection for early colorectal neoplasia: pathologic basis, procedures, and outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 52(8):1502–1515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kudo S, Lambert R, Allen JI, Fujii H, Fujii T, Kashida H, Matsuda T, Mori M, Saito H, Shimoda T, Tanaka S, Watanabe H, Sung JJ, Feld AD, Inadomi JM, O’Brien MJ, Lieberman DA, Ransohoff DF, Soetikno RM, Triadafilopoulos G, Zauber A, Teixeira CR, Rey JF, Jaramillo E, Rubio CA, Van Gossum A, Jung M, Vieth M, Jass JR, Hurlstone PD (2008) Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc 68(4 Suppl):S3–S47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kitajima K, Fujimori T, Fujii S, Takeda J, Ohkura Y, Kawamata H, Kumamoto T, Ishiguro S, Kato Y, Shimoda T, Iwashita A, Ajioka Y, Watanabe H, Watanabe T, Muto T, Nagasako K (2004) Correlations between lymph node metastasis and depth of submucosal invasion in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma: a Japanese collaborative study. J Gastroenterol 39(6):534–543CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Park W, Kim B, Park SJ, Cheon JH, Kim TI, Kim WH, Hong SP (2014) Conventional endoscopic features are not sufficient to differentiate small, early colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 20(21):6586–6593CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hurlstone DP, Cross SS, Adam I, Shorthouse AJ, Brown S, Sanders DS, Lobo AJ (2004) Endoscopic morphological anticipation of submucosal invasion in flat and depressed colorectal lesions: clinical implications and subtype analysis of the kudo type V pit pattern using high-magnification-chromoscopic colonoscopy. Colorectal Dis 6(5):369–375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hurlstone DP, Cross SS, Drew K, Adam I, Shorthouse AJ, Brown S, Sanders DS, Lobo AJ (2004) An evaluation of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection using high-magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies. Endoscopy 36(6):491–498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matsuda T, Fujii T, Saito Y, Nakajima T, Uraoka T, Kobayashi N, Ikehara H, Ikematsu H, Fu KI, Emura F, Ono A, Sano Y, Shimoda T, Fujimori T (2008) Efficacy of the invasive/non-invasive pattern by magnifying chromoendoscopy to estimate the depth of invasion of early colorectal neoplasms. Am J Gastroenterol 103(11):2700–2706CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jang HW, Park SJ, Cheon JH, Kim TI, Kim WH, Hong SP (2014) Does magnifying narrow-band imaging or magnifying chromoendoscopy help experienced endoscopists assess invasion depth of large sessile and flat polyps? Dig Dis Sci 59(7):1520–1528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Humphris J, Swartz D, Egan BJ, Leong RW (2012) Status of confocal laser endomicroscopy in gastrointestinal disease. Trop Gastroenterol 33(1):9–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang TD, Friedland S, Sahbaie P, Soetikno R, Hsiung PL, Liu JT, Crawford JM, Contag CH (2007) Functional imaging of colonic mucosa with a fibered confocal microscope for real-time in vivo pathology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(11):1300–1305CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meining A, Saur D, Bajbouj M, Becker V, Peltier E, Hofler H, von Weyhern CH, Schmid RM, Prinz C (2007) In vivo histopathology for detection of gastrointestinal neoplasia with a portable, confocal miniprobe: an examiner blinded analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(11):1261–1267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG, Krishna M, Ghabril M, Hasan M, Crook JE, Gomez V, Raimondo M, Woodward T, Wolfsen HC, Wallace MB (2010) Comparison of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of colon polyps. Gastroenterology 138(3):834–842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    De Palma GD, Staibano S, Siciliano S, Persico M, Masone S, Maione F, Siano M, Mascolo M, Esposito D, Salvatori F, Persico G (2010) In vivo characterisation of superficial colorectal neoplastic lesions with high-resolution probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in combination with video-mosaicing: a feasibility study to enhance routine endoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 42(11):791–797CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ishii N, Itoh T, Horiki N, Matsuda M, Setoyama T, Suzuki S, Uemura M, Iizuka Y, Fukuda K, Suzuki K, Fujita Y (2010) Endoscopic submucosal dissection with a combination of small-caliber-tip transparent hood and flex knife for large superficial colorectal neoplasias including ileocecal lesions. Surg Endosc 24(8):1941–1947CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buchner AM, Gomez V, Heckman MG, Shahid MW, Achem S, Gill KR, Jamil LH, Kahaleh M, Lo SK, Picco M, Riegert-Johnson D, Raimondo M, Sciemeca D, Wolfsen H, Woodward T, Wallace MB (2011) The learning curve of in vivo probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for prediction of colorectal neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 73(3):556–560CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wallace M, Lauwers GY, Chen Y, Dekker E, Fockens P, Sharma P, Meining A (2011) Miami classification for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Endoscopy 43(10):882–891CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    De Palma GD, Luglio G, Staibano S, Bucci L, Esposito D, Maione F, Mascolo M, Ilardi G, Forestieri P (2014) Perioperative characterization of anastomotic doughnuts with high-resolution probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in colorectal cancer surgery: a feasibility study. Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3429-6 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kudo S, Rubio CA, Teixeira CR, Kashida H, Kogure E (2001) Pit pattern in colorectal neoplasia: endoscopic magnifying view. Endoscopy 33(4):367–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hirata M, Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I, Yoshida S, Yoshihara M, Chayama K (2007) Evaluation of microvessels in colorectal tumors by narrow band imaging magnification. Gastrointest Endosc 66(5):945–952CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bianco MA, Rotondano G, Marmo R, Garofano ML, Piscopo R, de Gregorio A, Baron L, Orsini L, Cipolletta L (2006) Predictive value of magnification chromoendoscopy for diagnosing invasive neoplasia in nonpolypoid colorectal lesions and stratifying patients for endoscopic resection or surgery. Endoscopy 38(5):470–476CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gomez V, Buchner AM, Dekker E, van den Broek FJ, Meining A, Shahid MW, Ghabril MS, Fockens P, Heckman MG, Wallace MB (2010) Interobserver agreement and accuracy among international experts with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in predicting colorectal neoplasia. Endoscopy 42(4):286–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of GastroenterologyYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of PathologyYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulKorea
  3. 3.Department of Medicine, The Graduate SchoolYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulKorea
  4. 4.Center for Colon Cancer, Center for Cancer Prevention and DetectionNational Cancer CenterGoyangKorea

Personalised recommendations