Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A specific role of endoscopic ultrasonography for therapeutic decision-making in patients with gastric cardia cancer

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The role of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in gastric cardia cancer should be further evaluated because the accuracy of EUS depends on tumor location. We aimed to identify a specific role of EUS for therapeutic decision-making in patients with gastric cardia cancer.

Methods

Initial EUS examinations for treatment-naïve gastric cancer that were followed by endoscopic resection or surgery were included in the study. Lesions were classified as cardiac and non-cardiac cancer according to tumor location. The diagnostic performance of EUS in predicting invasion depth was compared between the two groups.

Results

The overall accuracy of EUS in predicting invasion depth did not differ between the cardiac and non-cardiac cancer groups (44.4 vs. 52.3 %, P = 0.259). The underestimation rate was higher in the cardiac cancer group than in the non-cardiac cancer group (37.0 vs. 18.5 %, P = 0.001). When the depth of invasion was predicted to be deeper than the mucosa (submucosal or deeper) by EUS, the positive predictive value was 82.1 [95 % confidence interval (CI), 66.5–92.5 %] and 62.9 % (95 % CI, 60.5–66.9 %) in the cardiac and non-cardiac cancer groups, respectively (P = 0.015). In multivariable analysis, tumor location in the cardia was found to be an independent factor for the underestimation of invasion depth [odds ratio (95 % CI) = 2.242 (1.156–4.349)].

Conclusions

The underestimation rate in predicting invasion depth was significantly higher for cardiac cancers than for non-cardiac cancers. Therefore, selection of the treatment method for gastric cardia cancer via EUS should be done carefully.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14:113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Park CH, Shin S, Park JC, Shin SK, Lee SK, Lee YC, Lee H (2013) Long-term outcome of early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection: expanded indication is comparable to absolute indication. Dig Liver Dis 45:651–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Isomoto H, Shikuwa S, Yamaguchi N, Fukuda E, Ikeda K, Nishiyama H, Ohnita K, Mizuta Y, Shiozawa J, Kohno S (2009) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large-scale feasibility study. Gut 58:331–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Park CH, Lee H, Kim DW, Chung H, Park JC, Shin SK, Hyung WJ, Lee SK, Lee YC, Noh SH (2014) Clinical safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with surgery in elderly patients with early gastric cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 80:599–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jang YS, Lee BE, Kim GH, Park DY, Jeon HK, Baek DH, Kim DU, Song GA (2015) Factors associated with outcomes in endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric cardia tumors: a retrospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoteya S, Matsui A, Iizuka T, Kikuchi D, Yamada A, Yamashita S, Furuhata T, Domon K, Nakamura M, Mitani T, Ogawa O, Kasie M (2013) Comparison of the clinicopathological characteristics and results of endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophagogastric junction and non-junctional cancers. Digestion 87:29–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Park CH, Kim EH, Kim HY, Roh YH, Lee YC (2015) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early stage esophagogastric junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis 47:37–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsujii Y, Kato M, Inoue T, Yoshii S, Nagai K, Fujinaga T, Maekawa A, Hayashi Y, Akasaka T, Shinzaki S, Watabe K, Nishida T, Iijima H, Tsujii M, Takehara T (2015) Integrated diagnostic strategy for the invasion depth of early gastric cancer by conventional endoscopy and EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 82:452–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Puli SR, Batapati Krishna Reddy J, Bechtold ML, Antillon MR, Ibdah JA (2008) How good is endoscopic ultrasound for TNM staging of gastric cancers? a meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 14:4011–4019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mocellin S, Marchet A, Nitti D (2011) EUS for the staging of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 73:1122–1134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi J, Kim SG, Im JP, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS (2010) Is endoscopic ultrasonography indispensable in patients with early gastric cancer prior to endoscopic resection? Surg Endosc 24:3177–3185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee HH, Lim CH, Park JM, Cho YK, Song KY, Jeon HM, Park CH (2012) Low accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography for detailed T staging in gastric cancer. World J Surg Oncol 10:190

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mocellin S, Pasquali S (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the preoperative locoregional staging of primary gastric cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD009944

  14. Lee JY, Choi IJ, Kim CG, Cho SJ, Kook MC, Ryu KW, Kim YW (2016) Therapeutic decision-making using endoscopic ultrasonography in endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut Liver 10:42–50

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamamoto S, Nishida T, Kato M, Inoue T, Hayashi Y, Kondo J, Akasaka T, Yamada T, Shinzaki S, Iijima H, Tsujii M, Takehara T (2012) Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound image quality is necessary in endosonographic assessment of early gastric cancer invasion depth. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2012:194530

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Siewert J (1996) Carcinoma of the cardia: carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction-classification, pathology and extent of resection. Dis Esophagus 9:173–182

    Google Scholar 

  17. Greene FL, American Joint Committee on C, American Cancer S (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gotoda T, Yamamoto H, Soetikno RM (2006) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol 41:929–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ebihara Y, Okushiba S, Kurashima Y, Noji T, Nakamura T, Murakami S, Tamoto E, Tsuchikawa T, Okamura K, Shichinohe T, Hirano S (2015) Totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a propensity score matching analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg (in press)

  20. Jiang X, Hiki N, Yoshiba H, Nunobe S, Kumagai K, Sano T, Yamaguchi T (2011) Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy in patients with previous endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer. Br J Surg 98:385–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Choi J, Kim SG, Im JP, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS (2010) Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and conventional endoscopy for prediction of depth of tumor invasion in early gastric cancer. Endoscopy 42:705–713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Chul Park.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Chan Hyuk Park, Jun Chul Park, Hyunsoo Chung, Sung Kwan Shin, Sang Kil Lee, and Yong Chan Lee have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, C.H., Park, J.C., Chung, H. et al. A specific role of endoscopic ultrasonography for therapeutic decision-making in patients with gastric cardia cancer. Surg Endosc 30, 4193–4199 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4728-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4728-2

Keywords

Navigation