Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 30, Issue 9, pp 3783–3791 | Cite as

Resident involvement in laparoscopic procedures does not worsen clinical outcomes but may increase operative times and length of hospital stay

  • Jennifer Jolley
  • Daniel Lomelin
  • Anton Simorov
  • Carl Tadaki
  • Dmitry OleynikovEmail author



Surgical procedures have a learning curve regarding the number of cases required for proficiency. Consequently, involvement of less experienced resident surgeons may impact patients and the healthcare system. This study examines basic and advanced laparoscopic procedures performed between 2010 and 2011 and evaluates the resident surgeon participation effect.


Basic laparoscopic procedures (BL), appendectomy (LA), cholecystectomy (LC), and advanced Nissen fundoplication (LN) were queried from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Cases were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics v.22, α-level = 0.05. Multiple logistic regression was used, accounting for age, race, gender, admission status, wound classification, and ASA classification.


In total, 71,819 surgeries were reviewed, 66,327 BL (37,636 LC and 28,691 LA) and 5492 LN. Median age was 48 years for LC and 37 years for LA. In sum, 72.2 % of LC and 49.5 % of LA patients were female. LN median age was 59 years, and 67.7 % of patients were female. For BL, resident involvement was not significantly associated with mortality, morbidity, and return to the OR. Readmission was not related to resident involvement in LC. In LA, resident-involved surgeries had increased readmission and longer OR time, but decreased LOS. In LC, resident involvement was associated with longer LOS and OR time. Resident involvement was not a significant factor in the odds of mortality, morbidity, return to OR, or readmission in LN. Surgeries involving residents had increased odds of having longer LOS, and of lengthier surgery time.


We demonstrate resident involvement is safe and does not result in poorer patient outcomes. Readmissions and LOS were higher in BL, and operative times were longer in all surgeries. Resident operations do appear to have real consequences for patients and may impact the healthcare system financially.


Resident Laparoscopic procedure Appendectomy Cholecystectomy Nissen fundoplication 



The authors acknowledge support from The Center for Advanced Surgical Technology at the University of Nebraska Medical Center and the Foundation for Surgical Fellows.

Compliance with ethical standards


Daniel Lomelin and Drs. Jennifer Jolley, Anton Simorov, Carl Tadaki, and Dmitry Oleynikov have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Davis SS Jr, Husain FA, Lin E, Nandipati KC, Perez S, Sweeney JF (2013) Resident participation in index laparoscopic general surgical cases: impact of the learning environment on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 216:96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.08.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Castillo A, Zarak A, Kozol RA (2013) Does a new surgical residency program increase operating room times? J Surg Educ 70:700–702. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.06.019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Papandria D, Rhee D, Ortega G, Zhang Y, Gorgy A, Makary MA, Abdullah F (2012) Assessing trainee impact on operative time for common general surgical procedures in ACS-NSQIP. J Surg Educ 69:149–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.08.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Babineau TJ, Becker J, Gibbons G, Sentovich S, Hess D, Robertson S, Stone M (2004) The “cost” of operative training for surgical residents. Arch Surg 139:366–369. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.4.366 (discussion 369–70) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hernandez-Irizarry R, Zendejas B, Ali SM, Lohse CM, Farley DR (2012) Impact of resident participation on laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs: are residents slowing us down? J Surg Educ 69:746–752. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.08.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Uecker J, Luftman K, Ali S, Brown C (2013) Comparable operative times with and without surgery resident participation. J Surg Educ 70:696–699. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.06.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raval MV, Wang X, Cohen ME, Ingraham AM, Bentrem DJ, Dimick JB, Flynn T, Hall BL, Ko CY (2011) The influence of resident involvement on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 212:889–898. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.029 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    NSQIP Participant Use Data File (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malangoni MA, Biester TW, Jones AT, Klingensmith ME, Lewis FR Jr (2013) Operative experience of surgery residents: trends and challenges. J Surg Educ 70:783–788. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.09.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carson JS, Smith L, Are M, Edney J, Azarow K, Mercer DW, Thompson JS, Are C (2011) National trends in minimally invasive and open operative experience of graduating general surgery residents: implications for surgical skills curricula development? Am J Surg 202:720–726. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.045 (discussion 726) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tseng WH, Jin L, Canter RJ, Martinez SR, Khatri VP, Gauvin J, Bold RJ, Wisner D, Taylor S, Chen SL (2011) Surgical resident involvement is safe for common elective general surgery procedures. J Am Coll Surg 213:19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.03.014 (discussion 26–8) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iannuzzi JC, Rickles AS, Deeb AP, Sharma A, Fleming FJ, Monson JR (2013) Outcomes associated with resident involvement in partial colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 56:212–218. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318276862f CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lim S, Parsa AT, Kim BD, Rosenow JM, Kim JY (2015) Impact of resident involvement in neurosurgery: an analysis of 8748 patients from the 2011 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. J Neurosurg 122:962–970CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mehall JR, Shroff S, Fassler SA, Harper SG, Nejman JH, Zebley DM (2005) Comparing results of residents and attending surgeons to determine whether laparoscopic colectomy is safe. Am J Surg 189:738–741CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Advani V, Ahad S, Gonczy C, Markwell S, Hassan I (2012) Does resident involvement effect surgical times and complication rates during laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis? An analysis of 16,849 cases from the ACS-NSQIP. Am J Surg 203:347–351. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.08.015 (discussion 351–2) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Krell RW, Birkmeyer NJ, Reames BN, Carlin AM, Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, Collaborative Michigan Bariatric Surgery (2014) Effects of resident involvement on complication rates after laparoscopic gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg 218:253–260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Jolley
    • 1
  • Daniel Lomelin
    • 1
  • Anton Simorov
    • 1
  • Carl Tadaki
    • 2
  • Dmitry Oleynikov
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.The Center for Advanced Surgical Technology, Department of SurgeryUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, 986245 Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaUSA
  2. 2.Hardin Memorial HospitalElizabethtownUSA

Personalised recommendations