Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 30, Issue 8, pp 3474–3479 | Cite as

Long-term oncologic outcome of robotic versus open total thyroidectomy in PTC: a case-matched retrospective study

  • Seul Gi Lee
  • Jandee Lee
  • Min Jhi Kim
  • Jung Bum Choi
  • Tae Hyung Kim
  • Eun Jeong Ban
  • Cho Rok Lee
  • Sang Wook Kang
  • Jong Ju Jeong
  • Kee Hyun Nam
  • Young Suk Jo
  • Woong Youn ChungEmail author



The role of the robot in thyroid surgery remains uncertain, and it is unclear whether robotic total thyroidectomy (R-TT) can be justified as a standard treatment for patients with thyroid cancer. This study compared the long-term operative results and oncologic outcomes of R-TT and conventional open TT (O-TT) after propensity score matching of the cohorts.


This study retrospectively evaluated patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) who underwent TT with central compartment node dissection (CCND) by a single surgeon in tertiary medical center. Of the 833 patients, 94 (11.3 %) were lost to follow-up. 245 (33.2 %) underwent R-TT, and 494 (66.8 %) underwent O-TT. The mean follow-up duration was 74 (range 61–91) months. Propensity score matching in age, gender, tumor size, extrathyroidal invasion, multiplicity, bilaterality, and TNM stage identified 206 pairs of patients. The long-term oncologic outcomes were assessed in the R-TT and O-TT groups before and after adjustment for baseline covariates.


After adjustment for baseline covariates, serum thyroglobulin (Tg) (p = 0.746) and anti-thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) (p = 0.394) concentrations were similar in the two groups 5 years after surgery. Nine patients experienced locoregional recurrence, six in the O-TT and three in the R-TT group, with all recurrences in regional LNs. Disease-free survival (DFS) was similar in the R-TT and O-TT groups before matching (p = 0.890) and after adjustment for baseline covariates (p = 0.882).


This represents the first report of 5-year surgical outcomes in patients who underwent R-TT for thyroid cancer. Long-term oncologic quality was similar after R-TT and O-TT.


Robotic thyroidectomy Long-term oncologic outcome Disease-free survival Case-matched study Papillary thyroid cancer 


Compliance with ethical standards


Jandee Lee received grant supported from National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grants funded by the Korean government (MEST) (2014R1A1A2059343). Woong Youn Chung received grant support from a Faculty Research Grant from Yonsei University College of Medicine (6-2015-0056). Woong Youn Chung and Jandee Lee received Grant support from Intuitive Surgical Clinical Robotics Research Grant. Seul Gi Lee, Min Jhi Kim, Jung Bum Choi, Tae Hyung Kim, Eun Jeong Ban, Cho Rok Lee, Sang Wook Kang, Jong Ju Jeong, Kee Hyun Nam, Young Suk Jo have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Huscher CSG, Chiodini S, Napolitano C, Recher A (1997) Endoscopic right thyroid lobectomy. Surg Endosc Ultrasound Interv Tech 11(8):877Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duncan TD, Rashid Q, Speights F, Ejeh I (2007) Endoscopic transaxillary approach to the thyroid gland: our early experience. Surg Endosc 21(12):2166–2171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ikeda Y, Takami H, Sasaki Y, Takayama J, Niimi M, Kan S (2003) Clinical benefits in endoscopic thyroidectomy by the axillary approach. J Am Coll Surg 196(2):189–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS, Sung TY, Lee SC, Lee YS, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS (2009) Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients. Surg Endosc 23(11):2399–2406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS (2009) Robot-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid malignancies using a gasless transaxillary approach. J Am Coll Surg 209(2):e1–e7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kang SW, Lee SC, Lee SH, Lee KY, Jeong JJ, Lee YS, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS (2009) Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients. Surgery 146(6):1048–1055CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perrier ND, Randolph GW, Inabnet WB, Marple BF, VanHeerden J, Kuppersmith RB (2010) Robotic thyroidectomy: a framework for new technology assessment and safe implementation. Thyroid 20(12):1327–1332CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee J, Nah KY, Kim RM, Ahn YH, Soh EY, Chung WY (2010) Differences in postoperative outcomes, function, and cosmesis: open versus robotic thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc 24(12):3186–3194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tae K, Ji YB, Jeong JH, Lee SH, Jeong MA, Park CW (2011) Robotic thyroidectomy by a gasless unilateral axillo-breast or axillary approach: our early experiences. Surg Endosc 25(1):221–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tae K, Ji YB, Cho SH, Lee SH, Kim DS, Kim TW (2012) Early surgical outcomes of robotic thyroidectomy by a gasless unilateral axillo-breast or axillary approach for papillary thyroid carcinoma: 2 years’ experience. Head Neck 34(5):617–625CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee S, Ryu HR, Park JH, Kim KH, Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, Chung WY, Park CS (2012) Early surgical outcomes comparison between robotic and conventional open thyroid surgery for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Surgery 151(5):724–730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jackson NR, Yao L, Tufano RP, Kandil EH (2014) Safety of robotic thyroidectomy approaches: meta-analysis and systematic review. Head Neck J Sci Spec Head Neck 36(1):137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ, Mazzaferri EL, McIver B, Pacini F, Schlumberger M, Sherman SI, Steward DL, Tuttle RM (2010) Revised American thyroid association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer (vol 20, pg 674, 2010). Thyroid 20(8):942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ryu HR, Kang SW, Lee SH, Rhee KY, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, Chung WY, Park CS (2010) Feasibility and safety of a new robotic thyroidectomy through a gasless, transaxillary single-incision approach. J Am Coll Surg 211(3):e13–e19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee J, Na KY, Kim RM, Oh Y, Lee JH, Lee J, Lee JS, Kim CH, Soh EY, Chung WY (2012) Postoperative functional voice changes after conventional open or robotic thyroidectomy: a prospective trial. Ann Surg Oncol 19(9):2963–2970CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tae K, Kim KY, Yun BR, Ji YB, Park CW, Kim DS, Kim TW (2012) Functional voice and swallowing outcomes after robotic thyroidectomy by a gasless unilateral axillo-breast approach: comparison with open thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc 26(7):1871–1877CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee J, Kang SW, Jung JJ, Choi UJ, Yun JH, Nam KH, Soh EY, Chung WY (2011) Multicenter study of robotic thyroidectomy: short-term postoperative outcomes and surgeon ergonomic considerations. Ann Surg Oncol 18(9):2538–2547CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kandil EH, Noureldine SI, Yao L, Slakey DP (2012) Robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy: an examination of the first one hundred cases. J Am Coll Surg 214(4):558–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee J, Yun JH, Nam KH, Soh EY, Chung WY (2011) The learning curve for robotic thyroidectomy: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 18(1):226–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee S, Lee CR, Lee SC, Park S, Kim HY, Son H, Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, Chung WY, Park CS, Cho A (2014) Surgical completeness of robotic thyroidectomy: a prospective comparison with conventional open thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma patients. Surg Endosc 28(4):1068–1075CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee KE, Koo do H, Im HJ, Park SK, Choi JY, Paeng JC, Chung JK, Oh SK, Youn YK (2011) Surgical completeness of bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy: comparison with conventional open thyroidectomy after propensity score matching. Surgery 150(6):1266–1274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lang BH, Chan DT, Wong KP, Wong KK, Wan KY (2014) Predictive factors and pattern of locoregional recurrence after prophylactic central neck dissection in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 21(13):4181–4187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kruijff S, Petersen JF, Chen P, Aniss AM, Clifton-Bligh RJ, Sidhu SB, Delbridge LW, Gill AJ, Learoyd D, Sywak MS (2014) Patterns of structural recurrence in papillary thyroid cancer. World J Surg 38(3):653–659CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seul Gi Lee
    • 1
  • Jandee Lee
    • 1
  • Min Jhi Kim
    • 1
  • Jung Bum Choi
    • 1
  • Tae Hyung Kim
    • 1
  • Eun Jeong Ban
    • 1
  • Cho Rok Lee
    • 1
  • Sang Wook Kang
    • 1
  • Jong Ju Jeong
    • 1
  • Kee Hyun Nam
    • 1
  • Young Suk Jo
    • 2
  • Woong Youn Chung
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Open NBI Convergence Technology Research Laboratory, Severance Hospital, Yonsei Cancer CenterYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of Internal Medicine, Open NBI Convergence Technology Research Laboratory, Severance Hospital, Yonsei Cancer CenterYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations