Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 30, Issue 7, pp 2951–2960 | Cite as

A multicenter study of initial experience with single-incision robotic cholecystectomies (SIRC) demonstrating a high success rate in 465 cases

  • Anthony GonzalezEmail author
  • Christian Hernandez Murcia
  • Rey Romero
  • Ernesto Escobar
  • Pedro Garcia
  • Gail Walker
  • Michelle Gallas
  • Eugene Dickens
  • Bruce McIntosh
  • William Norwood
  • Keith Kim
  • Jorge Rabaza
  • Don Parris
Article

Abstract

Background

Recently, the robotic single-site platform has been used to ameliorate the difficulties seen in single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILC) while preserving the benefits of standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical outcomes of a large series of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy (SIRC).

Methods

Medical records of consecutive patients who underwent SIRC were retrospectively reviewed. All procedures were performed by six surgeons at five different North American centers involved in the study. All patients included in the study underwent a cholecystectomy attempted through single site at the umbilicus, using the da Vinci® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc. Sunnyvale, CA).

Results

A total of 465 patients met study criteria. Median age was 48 years (range 18–89); 351 (75.5 %) were female and 304 (66.4 %) were overweight or obese. Except for gender, case characteristics differed significantly by surgeon/site. Previous abdominal surgery was reported for 226 (48.6 %) cases. SIRC was successfully completed in 455 (97.8 %) cases, and there were no conversions to open surgery. Median surgical time was 52 min with a decreasing trend after 55–85 cases. Male gender, obesity and diagnoses other than biliary dyskinesia were independent predictors of longer surgical times. The complication rate was 2.6 %.

Conclusions

Our large, multicenter study demonstrates that robotic single-site cholecystectomy is safe and feasible in a wide range of patients.

Keywords

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Single incision Robotic platform 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Amy Garner (APRN-ACNP) and Michael McIntosh for data collection.

Funding

This investigator initiated study was funded as a Research Grant by Intuitive Surgical. The study was conceptualized, designed and managed by Dr. Anthony Gonzalez as a lead investigator.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

William Norwood, MD, Christian Hernandez Murcia, MD, Rey Romero, MD, Ernesto Escobar, MD, Pedro Garcia, MD, Gail Walker, Ph.D., Michelle Gallas, Ph.D., and Don Parris, Ph.D. have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose, other than the Grant received from Intuitive Surgical by their respective Institutions for this study. Anthony Gonzalez, MD is a consultant and has received research grants from Intuitive Surgical. He is a consultant with Ethicon. He is on the speaker bureau of Mallinkrodt Pharmaceuticals. He has also received research grants and participated in the scientific advisory board for Minimally Invasive Devices, Inc. Eugene Dickens, MD is a consultant for Intuitive Surgical. Bruce McIntosh, MD is a consultant for Intuitive Surgical and a speaker for Bard. Keith Kim, MD serves as consultant for Intuitive Surgical and Ethicon Endosurgery. Additionally, he has a research Grant with Ethicon Endosurgery. Jorge Rabaza, MD is a proctor for Intuitive Surgical.

References

  1. 1.
    Reynolds W Jr (2001) The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 5:89–94PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zorron R, Filgueiras M, Maggioni LC, Pombo L, Lopes Carvalho G, Lacerda Oliveira A (2007) NOTES. Transvaginal cholecystectomy: report of the first case. Surg Innov 14:279–283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coomber RS, Sodergren MH, Clark J, Teare J, Yang GZ, Darzi A (2012) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery applications in clinical practice. World J Gastrointest Endosc 4:65–74CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sodergren MH, Aslanyan A, Mcgregor CG, Purkayastha S, Malhotra S, Darzi A, Paraskeva P (2014) Pain, well-being, body image and cosmesis: a comparison of single-port and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 23:223–229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jørgensen LN, Rosenberg J, Al-Tayar H, Assaadzadeh S, Helgstrand F, Bisgaard T (2014) Randomized clinical trial of single- versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 101:347–355CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qiu J, Yuan H, Chen S, He Z, Han P, Wu H (2013) Single-port versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 23:815–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gumbau Puchol V, Mir Labrador J (2014) Colecistectomía por puerto único. Cir Esp 92:363–364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oruc MT, Ugurlu MU (2013) Extraumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with standard laparoscopic instruments. Scand J Surg 102:209–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pfluke JM, Parker M, Stauffer JA, Paetau AA, Bowers SP, Asbun HJ et al (2011) Laparoscopic surgery performed through a single incision: a systematic review of the current literature. J Am Coll Surg 212:113–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Romero RJ, Arad JK, Kosanovic R, Lamoureux J, Gonzalez AM (2014) Impact of fellowship during single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 18:8–13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arezzo A, Scozzari G, Famiglietti F, Passera R, Morino M (2013) Is single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27:2293–2304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Geng L, Sun C, Bai J (2013) Single incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076530 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, DeNoto G et al (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1037–1047CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Joseph M, Phillips MR, Farrell TM, Rupp CC (2012) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a higher bile duct injury rate: a review and a word of caution. Ann Surg 256:1–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kurpiewski W, Pesta W, Kowalczyk M, Głowacki L, Juśkiewicz W, Szynkarczuk R et al (2012) The outcomes of SILS cholecystectomy in comparison with classic four-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Videosurg Miniinv 7:286–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ross S, Rosemurgy A, Albrink M, Choung E, Dapri G, Gallagher S et al (2012) Consensus statement of the consortium for LESS cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26:2711–2716CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jung GO, Park DE, Chae KM (2012) Clinical results between single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective case-matched analysis in single institution. J Korean Surg Soc 83:374–380CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tay CW, Shen L, Hartman M, Iyer SG, Madhavan K, Chang SK (2013) SILC for SILC: single institution learning curve for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Minim Invasive Surg. doi: 10.1155/2013/381628 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kroh M, El-Hayek K, Rosenblatt S, Chand B, Escobar P, Kaouk J et al (2011) First human surgery with novel single-port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci single-site platform. Surg Endosc 25:3566–3573CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wren SM, Curet MJ (2011) Single-port robotic cholecystectomy: results from a first human use clinical study of the new da Vinci single-site surgical platform. Arch Surg 146:1122–1127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wohl H (1997) The cusum plot: its utility in the analysis of clinical data. N Engl J Med 296:1044–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W, Liu K, Lee CM, Whang K et al (2003) Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg 237:460–469PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 25:367–377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pariani D, Fontana S, Zetti G, Cortese F (2014) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by residents: a retrospective study on 569 patients. Surg Res Pract. doi: 10.1155/2014/912143 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ingraham A, Cohen M, Ko C, Hall B (2010) A current profile and assessment of North American cholecystectomy: results from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 211:176–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Keus F, de Jong JA, Goozsen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cohcrane Database Syst Rev. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006231 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Konstantinidis KM, Hirides P, Hirides S, Chrysocheris P, Georgiou M (2012) Cholecystectomy using a novel Single-SIte (®)robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 26:2687–2694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Spinoglio G, Priora F, Bianchi PP, Lucido FS, Licciardello A, Maglione V et al (2013) Real-time near-infrared [NIR] fluorescent cholangiography in single-site robotic cholecystectomy [SSRC]: a single-institutional study. Surg Endosc 27:2156–2162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Buzad FA, Corne LM, Brown TC, Fagin RS, Hebert AE, Kaczmarek CA et al (2013) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy: efficiency and cost analysis. Int J Med Robot 9:365–370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vidovszky TJ, Carr AD, Farinholt GN, Ho HS, Smith WH, Ali MR (2014) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy in a broadly inclusive patient population: a prospective study. Ann Surg 260:134–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Morel P, Buchs NC, Iranmanesh P, Pugin F, Buehler L, Azagury DE et al (2014) Robotic single-site cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21:18–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Angus AA, Sahi SL, McIntosh BB (2014) Learning curve and early clinical outcomes for a robotic surgery novice performing robotic single site cholecystectomy. Int J Med Robot 10:203–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gonzalez AM, Rabaza JR, Donkor C, Romero RJ, Kosanovic R, Verdeja JC (2013) Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms. Surg Endosc 27:4524–4531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Uras C, Böler DE, Ergüner I, Hamzaoğlu I (2014) Robotic single port cholecystectomy [R-LESS-C]: experience in 36 patients. Asian J Surg 37:115–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony Gonzalez
    • 1
  • Christian Hernandez Murcia
    • 1
  • Rey Romero
    • 1
  • Ernesto Escobar
    • 1
  • Pedro Garcia
    • 1
  • Gail Walker
    • 2
  • Michelle Gallas
    • 2
  • Eugene Dickens
    • 3
  • Bruce McIntosh
    • 4
  • William Norwood
    • 5
  • Keith Kim
    • 6
  • Jorge Rabaza
    • 1
  • Don Parris
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of General and Bariatric SurgeryBaptist Health South FloridaMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Population Health and Outcomes Research, Center for Research & GrantsBaptist Health South FloridaMiamiUSA
  3. 3.Utica Park ClinicTulsaUSA
  4. 4.Premier Surgical Specialists and William Beaumont HospitalTroyUSA
  5. 5.Norwood Surgical SpecialistsShreveportUSA
  6. 6.Florida Hospitals, Celebration HealthCelebrationUSA

Personalised recommendations