Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 30, Issue 7, pp 2895–2903 | Cite as

The learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection after the Louisville statement 2008: Will it be more effective and smooth?

  • Chung-Wei Lin
  • Tzu-Jung Tsai
  • Tsung-Yen Cheng
  • Hung-Kuang Wei
  • Chen-Fang Hung
  • Yin-Yin Chen
  • Chii-Ming Chen
Article

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been proven to be feasible and safe. However, it is a difficult and complex procedure with a steep learning curve. The aim of this study was to evaluate the learning curve of LLR at our institutions since 2008.

Methods

One hundred and twenty-six consecutive LLRs were included from May 2008 to December 2014. Patient characteristics, operative data, and surgical outcomes were collected prospectively and analyzed.

Results

The median tumor size was 25 mm (range 5–90 mm), and 96 % of the resected tumors were malignant. 41.3 % (52/126) of patients had pathologically proven liver cirrhosis. The median operation time was 216 min (range 40–602 min) with a median blood loss of 100 ml (range 20–2300 ml). The median length of hospital stay was 4 days (range 2–10 days). Six major postoperative complications occurred in this series, and there was no 90-day postoperative mortality. Regarding the incidence of major operative events including operation time longer than 300 min, perioperative blood loss above 500 ml, and major postoperative complications, the learning curve [as evaluated by the cumulative sum (CUSUM) technique] showed its first reverse after 22 cases. The indication of laparoscopic resection in this series extended after 60 cases to include tumors located in difficult locations (segments 4a, 7, 8) and major hepatectomy. CUSUM showed that the incidence of major operative events proceeded to increase again, and the second reverse was noted after an additional 40 cases of experience. Location of the tumor in a difficult area emerged as a significant predictor of major operative events.

Conclusions

In carefully selected patients, CUSUM analysis showed 22 cases were needed to overcome the learning curve for minor LLR.

Keywords

Laparoscopic Liver resection Hepatectomy Hepatocellular carcinoma Learning curve 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Drs. Chung-Wei Lin, Tzu-Jung Tsai, Tsung-Yen Cheng, Hung-Kuang Wei, Chen-Fang Hung, Yin-Yin Chen, and Chii-Ming Chen have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Gagner M, Rheault M, Dubuc J (1992) Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumor. Surg Endosc 6:97–98Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cherqui D, Husson E, Hammoud R, Malassagne B, Stéphan F, Bensaid S, Rotman N, Fagniez P-L (2000) Laparoscopic liver resections: a feasibility study in 30 patients. Ann Surg 232:753–762CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cherqui D, Laurent A, Tayar C, Chang S, Van Nhieu JT, Loriau J, Karoui M, Duvoux C, Dhumeaux D, Fagniez PL (2006) Laparoscopic liver resection for peripheral hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: midterm results and perspectives. Ann Surg 243:499–506CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dagher I, Belli G, Fantini C, Laurent A, Tayar C, Lainas P, Tranchart H, Franco D, Cherqui D (2010) Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a European experience. J Am Coll Surg 211:16–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vigano L, Tayar C, Laurent A, Cherqui D (2009) Laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg 16:410–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection—2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koffron AJ, Auffenberg G, Kung R, Abecassis M (2007) Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more. Ann Surg 246:385–392 (discussion 392–384) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buell JF, Thomas MT, Rudich S, Marvin M, Nagubandi R, Ravindra KV, Brock G, McMasters KM (2008) Experience with more than 500 minimally invasive hepatic procedures. Ann Surg 248:475–486PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen HY, Juan CC, Ker CG (2008) Laparoscopic liver surgery for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 15:800–806CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D (2009) The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg 250:772–782CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker C-G, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D’Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey J-N, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery. Ann Surg 250:825–830CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bryant R, Laurent A, Tayar C, Cherqui D (2009) Laparoscopic liver resection-understanding its role in current practice: the Henri Mondor Hospital experience. Ann Surg 250:103–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chaput de Saintonge D, Vere D (1974) Why don’t doctors use cusums? Lancet 1:120–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wohl H (1977) The cusum plot: its utility in the analysis of clinical data. N Engl J Med 296:1044–1045CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yap CH, Colson ME, Watters DA (2007) Cumulative sum techniques for surgeons: a brief review. ANZ J Surg 77:583–586CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, Asbun H, O’Rourke N, Tanabe M, Koffron AJ (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second International Consensus Conference Held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rao A, Rao G, Ahmed I (2012) Laparoscopic vs. open liver resection for malignant liver disease. A systematic review. Surgeon 10:194–201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Parks KR, Kuo YH, Davis JM, O’Brien B, Hagopian EJ (2014) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection: a meta-analysis of long-term outcome. HPB (Oxford) 16:109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A, Steel JJ, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2011) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 146:348–356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Han HS, Kaneko H, Buell JF (2014) Laparoscopic hepatectomy is theoretically better than open hepatectomy: preparing for the 2nd International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resection. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg 21:723–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vanounou T, Steel JL, Nguyen KT, Tsung A, Marsh JW, Geller DA, Gamblin TC (2010) Comparing the clinical and economic impact of laparoscopic versus open liver resection. Ann Surg Oncol 17:998–1009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lin NC, Nitta H, Wakabayashi G (2013) Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: a systematic literature review and comparison of 3 techniques. Ann Surg 257:205–213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dagher I, O’Rourke N, Geller DA, Cherqui D, Belli G, Gamblin TC, Lainas P, Laurent A, Nguyen KT, Marvin MR, Thomas M, Ravindra K, Fielding G, Franco D, Buell JF (2009) Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: an evolution in standard of care. Ann Surg 250:856–860CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pearce NW, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, Syed S, Primrose JN, Hilal MA (2011) Laparoscopic right hepatectomy: a challenging, but feasible, safe and efficient procedure. Am J Surg 202:e52–e58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y, Hasegawa Y, Katagiri T, Takagi C, Itano O, Kaneko H, Wakabayashi G (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci 21:745–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cho JY, Han H-S, Yoon Y-S, Shin S-H (2008) Feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for tumors located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver, with a special reference to overcoming current limitations on tumor location. Surgery 144:32–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ishizawa T, Gumbs AA, Kokudo N, Gayet B (2012) Laparoscopic segmentectomy of the liver: from segment I to VIII. Ann Surg 256:959–964CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yoon Y-S, Han H-S, Cho JY, Ahn KS (2010) Total laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma located in all segments of the liver. Surg Endosc 24:1630–1637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Belghiti J, Clavien P, Gadzijev E, Garden J, Lau W, Makuuchi M, Strong R (2000) The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2:333–339Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chung-Wei Lin
    • 1
    • 3
  • Tzu-Jung Tsai
    • 1
    • 3
  • Tsung-Yen Cheng
    • 1
    • 3
  • Hung-Kuang Wei
    • 1
    • 3
  • Chen-Fang Hung
    • 2
  • Yin-Yin Chen
    • 1
    • 3
  • Chii-Ming Chen
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Surgery and Surgical OncologyKoo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer CenterTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of ResearchKoo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer CenterTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.School of MedicineNational Yang-Ming UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations