Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 30, Issue 7, pp 3133–3137 | Cite as

Creation of a neopylorus after pyloric exclusion using a “double-endoscope” technique

  • Alexander T. Gibbons
  • Nicholas E. Bruns
  • Reinaldo Garcia
  • Matthew J. Wyneski
  • Todd A. PonskyEmail author
Dynamic Manuscript



Pyloric exclusion may be implemented in the setting of a high-grade duodenal or pancreatic injury. After exclusion, the pylorus should spontaneously open in 3–6 weeks. However, we present the case of a critically ill 17-year-old male with a gunshot wound to the abdomen that underwent stapled pyloric exclusion with gastrostomy and jejunostomy tube placement who did not achieve pyloric patency after 5 months, and describe an innovative “double-endoscope” technique to correct it.


A gastroscope was inserted through the mouth into the stomach, and an endoscope was inserted retrograde through the jejunostomy site to the duodenum. The closed pylorus was seen from both ends with transillumination. A needle knife was pushed through the membrane with clear visualization from the contralateral side. A balloon dilation catheter was then passed over a guidewire, and the neopylorus was sequentially dilated. A gastrojejunostomy tube was placed to ensure patency of the neopylorus. Postoperative imaging showed no evidence of leak or pneumoperitoneum. Serial endoscopic dilations were performed every 1–4 weeks to prevent restricturing.


The patient recovered well. After the first follow-up endoscopic dilation, he was eating a regular diet and had no retained food products. After four endoscopic dilations, the patient remained symptom free and the pylorus was widely patent. His gastrostomy and jejunostomy tubes were removed.


Here we presented a rare complication of pyloric exclusion and an innovative approach that used a “double-endoscope” technique and serial endoscopic dilations to establish and maintain a neopylorus, avoiding the morbidity of a major surgical procedure.


Endoscopic balloon dilation Pyloric exclusion Neopylorus 


Compliance with ethical standards


Dr. Ponsky is the owner of GlobalCastMD. Mr. Gibbons, Dr. Bruns, Dr. Garcia, and Dr. Wyneksi have no potential conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 255169 kb)


  1. 1.
    Seamon MJ, Pieri PG, Fisher CA, Gaughan J, Santora TA, Pathak AS, Bradley KM, Goldberg AJ (2007) A ten-year retrospective review: does pyloric exclusion improve clinical outcome after penetrating duodenal and combined pancreaticoduodenal injuries? J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 62:829–833. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318033a790 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asensio JA, Feliciano DV, Britt LD, Kerstein MD (1993) Management of duodenal injuries. Curr Probl Surg 30:1026–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ordoñez C, García A, Parra MW, Scavo D, Pino LF, Millán M, Badiel M, Sanjuán J, Rodriguez F, Ferrada R, Puyana JC (2014) Complex penetrating duodenal injuries: less is better. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76:1177–1183. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000214 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    García Santos E, Soto Sánchez A, Verde JM, Marini CP, Asensio JA, Petrone P (2015) Duodenal injuries due to trauma: review of the literature. Cir Esp 93:68–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2014.08.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cruvinel Neto J, Pereira BMT, Ribeiro MAF Jr, Rizoli S, Fraga GP, Rezende-Neto JB (2014) Is there a role for pyloric exclusion after severe duodenal trauma? Rev Col Bras Cir 41:228–231. doi: 10.1590/S0100-69912014000300016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fraga GP, Biazotto G, Bortoto JB, Andreollo NA, Mantovani M (2008) The use of pyloric exclusion for treating duodenal trauma: case series. Sao Paulo Med J 126:337–341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Malangoni MA, Jurkovich GJ, Champion HR (1996) Scaling system for organ specific injuries. Curr Opin Crit Care 2:450–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Timaran CH, Martinez O, Ospina JA (1999) Prognostic factors and management of civilian penetrating duodenal trauma. J Trauma-Inj Infect 47:330–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ladd AP, West KW, Rouse TM, Scherer LR, Rescorla FJ, Engum SA, Grosfeld JL (2002) Surgical management of duodenal injuries in children. Surgery 132:748–753. doi: 10.1067/msy.2002.127673 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rana SS, Bhasin DK, Chandail VS, Gupta R, Nada R, Kang M, Nagi B, Singh R, Singh K (2011) Endoscopic balloon dilatation without fluoroscopy for treating gastric outlet obstruction because of benign etiologies. Surg Endosc 25:1579–1584. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1442-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ljubičić N, Bišćanin A, Nikić I, Budimir I, Nikolić M, Pavić T (2013) Endoscopic balloon dilatation of postsurgical intestinal strictures: case report and review of the literature. Acta Clin Croat 52:374–379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stienecker K (2009) Long-term results of endoscopic balloon dilatation of lower gastrointestinal tract strictures in Crohn’s disease: a prospective study. World J Gastroenterol 15:2623. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2623 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander T. Gibbons
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nicholas E. Bruns
    • 1
  • Reinaldo Garcia
    • 3
  • Matthew J. Wyneski
    • 3
  • Todd A. Ponsky
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric SurgeryAkron Children’s HospitalAkronUSA
  2. 2.Case Western Reserve University School of MedicineClevelandUSA
  3. 3.Department of Pediatric GastroenterologyAkron Children’s HospitalAkronUSA

Personalised recommendations