Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 2530–2534 | Cite as

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration using V-Loc suture with insertion of endobiliary stent

  • Jun Suh Lee
  • Young Chul Yoon
Article

Abstract

Background

The treatment of concomitant gallbladder (GB) and common bile duct (CBD) stones is still variable, without a standard treatment protocol. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy is widely being used, but laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is also being widely performed. We present our method of LCBDE, with anterograde insertion of an endobiliary stent and primary closure of the CBD using unidirectional barbed suture.

Methods

From November 2013 to March 2015, LCBDE was performed on 15 consecutive patients. Chart review was performed to analyze demographic data and perioperative data. After dissection of the GB from the liver bed, the CBD is dissected and a choledochotomy is made. A choledochoscope is inserted in the CBD, and using various methods, CBD stones are extracted. An endobiliary stent is inserted, and the CBD is closed using unidirectional barbed sutures.

Results

Mean age of the patients was 64.7 ± 12.5 years. Of the 15 patients, six patients (40 %) were male and nine patients (60 %) were female. The average operation time and postoperative stay were 90.7 ± 32.5 min and 4.3 ± 1.2 days, respectively. There were no significant complications such as postoperative bleeding, bile leakage, or biliary stricture.

Conclusions

LCBDE using barbed V-Loc suture with insertion of endobiliary stent is a safe, feasible treatment modality that is easily reproducible. Our preliminary results show a zero complication rate, with an acceptable operation time.

Keywords

Laparoscopy Common bile duct diseases Choledocholithiasis 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Jun Suh Lee and Young Chul Yoon have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzgerald E, O’Sullivan GC (2004) A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 239:28–33CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hemli JM, Arnot RS, Ashworth JJ, Curtin AM, Simon RA, Townend DM (2004) Feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in a rural centre. ANZ J Surg 74:979–982CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Petelin JB (2003) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 17:1705–1715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Gardner GC (2001) Laparoscopic surgery and the common bile duct. World J Surg 25:1317–1324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bansal VK, Misra MC, Rajan K, Kilambi R, Kumar S, Krishna A, Kumar A, Pandav CS, Subramaniam R, Arora MK, Garg PK (2014) Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 28:875–885CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ding G, Cai W, Qin M (2014) Single-stage vs. two-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial with long-term follow-up. J Gastrointest Surg 18:947–951CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koc B, Karahan S, Adas G, Tutal F, Guven H, Ozsoy A (2013) Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomized study. Am J Surg 206:457–463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dong ZT, Wu GZ, Luo KL, Li JM (2014) Primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus T-tube. J Surg Res 189:249–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang HW, Chen YJ, Wu CH, Li WD (2014) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure for management of choledocholithiasis: a retrospective analysis and comparison with conventional T-tube drainage. Am Surg 80:178–181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen CC, Wu SD, Tian Y, Siwo EA, Zeng XT, Zhang GH (2011) Sphincter of Oddi-preserving and T-tube-free laparoscopic management of extrahepatic bile duct calculi. World J Surg 35:2283–2289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Milone M, Di Minno MN, Galloro G, Maietta P, Bianco P, Milone F, Musella M (2013) Safety and efficacy of barbed suture for gastrointestinal suture: a prospective and randomized study on obese patients undergoing gastric bypass. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:756–759CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Patri P, Beran C, Stjepanovic J, Sandberg S, Tuchmann A, Christian H (2011) V-Loc, a new wound closure device for peritoneal closure—is it safe? A comparative study of different peritoneal closure systems. Surg Innov 18:145–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Edil BH, Cooper MA, Makary MA (2014) Laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy using a barbed suture: a novel technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24:887–891CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malya FU, Karatepe O, Bektasoglu H, Cipe G, Bozkurt S, Hasbahceci M, Ozturk G, Yildiz K, Muslumanoglu M (2014) A reliable pancreaticojejunal anastomosis with V-Loc 180 wound closure device for soft pancreatic stump. Hepatogastroenterology 61:484–488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Topal B, Vromman K, Aerts R, Verslype C, Van Steenbergen W, Penninckx F (2010) Hospital cost categories of one-stage versus two-stage management of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24:413–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim EY, Lee SH, Lee JS, Hong TH (2015) Laparoscopic CBD exploration using a V-shaped choledochotomy. BMC Surg 15:62CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Köhler G, Mayer F, Lechner M, Bittner R (2015) Small bowel obstruction after TAPP repair caused by a self-anchoring barbed suture device for peritoneal closure: case report and review of the literature. Hernia 19:389–394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Incheon St. Mary’s HospitalThe Catholic University of KoreaIncheonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations