Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 1356–1363 | Cite as

Single-port versus conventional laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial

  • Sujith WijerathneEmail author
  • Narendra Agarwal
  • Ahmad Ramzi
  • Dino H. Liem
  • Wee B. Tan
  • Davide Lomanto
Article

Abstract

Background

The advantage of single-port total extra-peritoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair over the conventional technique is still debatable. Our objective was to compare the outcomes of TEP inguinal hernia repair using either a single-port or conventional surgical technique, in two blind randomized groups of patients.

Methods

In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial, 100 patients undergoing surgery for unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized into two groups: One group underwent conventional laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair, while the other was selected for single-port TEP repair. Primary endpoint is postoperative pain (VAS), while secondary endpoints are recurrence, chronic pain and complications.

Results

From 100 patients, 49 underwent single-port hernia TEP repair, 50 had conventional three-port TEP hernia repair, and one patient declined to participate after randomization. The two groups were comparable in terms of patient demographics and operative findings. Mean operative time was 49.1(±13.8) min in the conventional group and 54.1(±14.4) min in the single-port group (p = 0.08). Mean hospital stay was 19.7(±5.8) h in the conventional group and 20.5(±6.4) h in the single-port group (p = 0.489). No major complications and no recurrence reported at 11-month follow-up. No statistically significant difference noted in postoperative pain between the two groups at regular intervals.

Conclusions

The outcomes after laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair with a single-port device are similar but not superior to the conventional technique.

Keywords

Single port Total extra-peritoneal (TEP) Inguinal hernia Randomized trial 

Notes

Disclosures

Doctors Sujith Wijerathne, Narendra Agarwal, Ahmad Ramzi, Dino H Liem, Wee B Tan and Professor Davide Lomanto have no conflict of interest and financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Dulucq JL (1992) Treatment of inguinal hernia by insertion of a subperitoneal patch under pre-peritoneoscopy. Chirurgie 118(1–2):83–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cugura JF, Kirac I, Kulis T, Jankovic J, Beslin MB (2008) First case of single incision laparoscopic surgery for totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Acta Clin Croat 47(4):249–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sherwinter DA (2010) Transitioning to single-incision laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. JSLS 14(3):353–357CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cugura JF, Kirac I, Kulis T, Sremac M, Ledinsky M, Beslin MB (2012) Comparison of single incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: initial experience. J Endourol 26(1):63–66CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim JH, Lee YS, Kim JJ, Park SM (2013) Single port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty: a comparative study of short-term outcome with conventional laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty. World J Surg 37(4):746–751CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tai HC, Lin CD, Chung SD, Chueh SC, Tsai YC, Yang SS (2011) A comparative study of standard versus laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 25(9):2879–2883CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wijerathne S, Agarwal N, Ramzy A, Lomanto D (2014) A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare single-port endo-laparoscopic surgery versus conventional TEP inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 28(11):3053–3058CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tsai YC, Ho CH, Tai HC, Chung SD, Chueh SC (2013) Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 27:4684–4692CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P (2008) Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 148(4):295–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miserez M, Alexandre JH, Campanelli G, Corcione F, Cuccurullo D, Pascual MH et al (2007) The European hernia society groin hernia classification: simple and easy to remember. Hernia 11(2):113–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liem MS, van Duyn EB, van der Graaf Y, van Vroonhoven TJ (2003) Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison. Ann Surg 237(1):136–141CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Langeveld HR, van’t Riet M, Weidema WF, Stassen LP, Steyerberg EW, Lange J et al (2010) Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-Trial): a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 251(5):819–824CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wright D, Paterson C, Scott N, Hair A, O’Dwyer PJ (2002) Five-year follow-up of patients undergoing laparoscopic or open groin hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 235(3):333–337CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Reilly EA, Burke JP, O’Connell PR (2012) A meta-analysis of surgical morbidity and recurrence after laparoscopic and open repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Ann Surg 255(5):846–853CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Camps J, Cornet DA, Nguyen NX, Litke BS, Annibali R et al (1995) Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Results of a multicenter trial. Ann Surg 221(1):3–13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liem MS, van der Graaf Y, van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS et al (1997) Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair. N Engl J Med 336(22):1541–1547CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ferzli GS, Massaad A, Dysarz FA 3rd, Kopatsis A (1993) A study of 101 patients treated with extraperitoneal endoscopic laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Am Surg 59(11):707–708PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuhry E, van Veen RN, Langeveld HR, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ (2007) Open or endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair? A systematic review. Surg Endosc 21(2):161–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rehman H, Rao AM, Ahmed I (2011) Single incision versus conventional multi-incision appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD009022PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ding J, Xia Y, Zhang ZM, Liao GQ, Pan Y, Liu S et al (2013) Single-incision versus conventional three-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy for appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 48(5):1088–1098CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, Muirhead L, Kinross J, Paraskeva P (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 26(5):1205–1213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Garg P, Thakur JD, Garg M, Menon GR (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Surg 16(8):1618–1628CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chang SK, Wang YL, Shen L, Iyer SG, Shaik AB, Lomanto D (2013) Interim report: a randomized controlled trial comparing postoperative pain in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg 6(1):14–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li P, Wang DR, Wang LH, Li YK, Chen J (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery vs. multiport laparoscopic surgery for colectomy: a meta-analysis of eleven recent studies. Hepatogastroenterology 59(117):1345–1349PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lau H, Lee F (2002) A prospective comparative study of needlescopic and conventional endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 16(12):1737–1740CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goo TT, Goel R, Lawenko M, Lomanto D (2010) Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair via a single port. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20(6):389–390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kwon KH, Son BH, Han WK (2011) Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair without suprapubic port: comparison with conventional totally extraperitoneal repair. J Korean Surg Soc 80(5):319–326CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sato H, Shimada M, Kurita N, Iwata T, Nishioka M, Morimoto S et al (2012) The safety and usefulness of the single incision, transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic technique for inguinal hernia. J Med Invest. 59(3–4):235–240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Agrawal S, Shaw A, Soon Y (2010) Single-port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with the TriPort system: initial experience. Surg Endosc 24(4):952–956CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Do M, Liatsikos E, Beatty J, Haefner T, Dunn I, Kallidonis P et al (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: initial experience in 10 patients. J Endourol 25(6):963–968CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Buckley FP 3rd, Vassaur H, Monsivais S, Sharp NE, Jupiter D, Watson R et al (2014) Comparison of outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy and traditional three-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy at a single institution. Surg Endosc 28(1):30–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wakasugi M, Masuzawa T, Tei M, Omori T, Ueshima S, Tori M et al (2014) Single-incision totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: our initial 100 cases and comparison with conventional three-port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Surg Today 45:606–610CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    de Araujo FB, Starling ES, Maricevich M, Tobias-Machado M (2014) Single site and conventional totally extraperitoneal techniques for uncomplicated inguinal hernia repair: a comparative study. J Minim Access Surg 10(4):197–201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lai H, Li G, Xiao J, Lin Y, Lu B (2014) Single-incision laparoscopic hernioplasty versus multi-incision laparoscopic hernioplasty: a meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 84(3):128–136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sujith Wijerathne
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Narendra Agarwal
    • 1
  • Ahmad Ramzi
    • 1
  • Dino H. Liem
    • 1
  • Wee B. Tan
    • 1
  • Davide Lomanto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgical CentreNational University Health SystemSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of General SurgeryNational University Health SystemSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations