Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 1086–1093 | Cite as

Factors associated with failure of enhanced recovery programs after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective study

  • Heung-Kwon Oh
  • Myong Hun Ihn
  • Il Tae Son
  • Jin Taek Park
  • Jaebong Lee
  • Duck-Woo Kim
  • Sung-Bum KangEmail author
Article

Abstract

Background

Although enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) have been proven to be beneficial after laparoscopic colon surgery, they may result in adverse clinical outcomes following failure. This study analyzed risk factors associated with ERP failure after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery.

Methods

We analyzed the outcomes of 208 patients who underwent ERPs following laparoscopic colon cancer surgery between June 2007 and April 2013. The ERP included early oral feeding, early ambulation, and regular laxative administration. ERP failure was defined as postoperative hospital stay of more than 5 days related to postoperative complications, unplanned readmission within 30 days of surgery, or death.

Results

Surgical procedures included anterior resection (n = 101), right hemicolectomy (n = 90), and left hemicolectomy (n = 17). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.5 ± 2.3 days (range 3–24 days). ERP failure occurred in 36 patients (17.3 %), with no mortality; reasons included ileus (n = 14), wound infection (n = 4), chylous drainage (n = 3), anastomotic bleeding (n = 3), pneumonia (n = 1), or readmission (n = 11) owing to delayed complications. Univariable analysis showed that ERP failure was associated with proximal colon cancer, side-to-side anastomosis, longer operation time, increased blood loss, and longer resected specimen length. Multivariable analysis showed that side-to-side anastomosis [odds ratio (OR) 4.534; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.902–10.811; P = 0.001] and increased blood loss (OR 1.004; 95 % CI 1.001–1.008; P = 0.041) were independent risk factors for ERP failure.

Conclusions

We showed that increased blood loss and side-to-side anastomosis in comparison with end-to-end anastomosis were independent risk factors associated with ERP failure after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. This suggests that intraoperative elements may be important determinants to obtain successful postoperative recovery in the era of ERP.

Keywords

Enhanced recovery program Early rehabilitation Fast-track Laparoscopy Enhanced recovery after surgery ERAS Colon cancer 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Korea, provided support for statistical analysis. The authors are indebted to J. Patrick Barron, Professor Emeritus of Tokyo Medical University and Adjunct Professor of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital for his contributions to manuscript editing.

Disclosures

Heung-Kwon Oh, Myong Hun Ihn, Il Tae Son, Jin Taek Park, Jaebong Lee, Duck-Woo Kim, and Sung-Bum Kang have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Chestovich PJ, Lin AY, Yoo J (2013) Fast-track pathways in colorectal surgery. Surg Clin N Am 93:21–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wind J, Hofland J, Preckel B, Hollmann MW, Bossuyt PM, Gouma DJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Fuhring JW, Dejong CH, van Dam RM, Cuesta MA, Noordhuis A, de Jong D, van Zalingen E, Engel AF, Goei TH, de Stoppelaar IE, van Tets WF, van Wagensveld BA, Swart A, van den Elsen MJ, Gerhards MF, de Wit LT, Siepel MA, van Geloven AA, Juttmann JW, Clevers W, Bemelman WA (2006) Perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA trial). BMC surg 6:16PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Soop M, Carlson GL, Hopkinson J, Clarke S, Thorell A, Nygren J, Ljungqvist O (2004) Randomized clinical trial of the effects of immediate enteral nutrition on metabolic responses to major colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery protocol. Br J Surg 91:1138–1145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2008) Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 248:189–198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wilmore DW, Kehlet H (2001) Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ 322:473–476PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nicholson A, Lowe MC, Parker J, Lewis SR, Alderson P, Smith AF (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients. Br J Surg 101:172–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee TG, Kang SB, Kim DW, Hong S, Heo SC, Park KJ (2011) Comparison of early mobilization and diet rehabilitation program with conventional care after laparoscopic colon surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 54:21–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, Engel AF, Gerhards MF, van Wagensveld BA, van der Zaag ES, van Geloven AA, Sprangers MA, Cuesta MA, Bemelman WA, group Ls (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254:868–875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhuang CL, Ye XZ, Zhang XD, Chen BC, Yu Z (2013) Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 56:667–678CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brown SR, Mathew R, Keding A, Marshall HC, Brown JM, Jayne DG (2014) The impact of postoperative complications on long-term quality of life after curative colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 259:916–923CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Keller DS, Bankwitz B, Nobel T, Delaney CP (2014) Using frailty to predict who will fail early discharge after laparoscopic colorectal surgery with an established recovery pathway. Dis Colon Rectum 57:337–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stottmeier S, Harling H, Wille-Jorgensen P, Balleby L, Kehlet H (2012) Postoperative morbidity after fast-track laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 14:769–775CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choi YS, Lee SI, Lee TG, Kim SW, Cheon G, Kang SB (2007) Economic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in Korea. Surg Today 37:127–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Neville A, Lee L, Antonescu I, Mayo NE, Vassiliou MC, Fried GM, Feldman LS (2014) Systematic review of outcomes used to evaluate enhanced recovery after surgery. Br J Surg 101:159–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aarts MA, Okrainec A, Glicksman A, Pearsall E, Victor JC, McLeod RS (2012) Adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies for colorectal surgery at academic teaching hospitals and impact on total length of hospital stay. Surg Endosc 26:442–450CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bergman S, Feldman LS, Barkun JS (2006) Evaluating surgical outcomes. Surg Clin N Am 86:129–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lawrence VA, Hazuda HP, Cornell JE, Pederson T, Bradshaw PT, Mulrow CD, Page CP (2004) Functional independence after major abdominal surgery in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg 199:762–772CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kulaylat AN, Dillon PW, Hollenbeak CS, Stewart DB (2015) Determinants of 30-d readmission after colectomy. J Surg Res 193:528–535CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kassin MT, Owen RM, Perez SD, Leeds I, Cox JC, Schnier K, Sadiraj V, Sweeney JF (2012) Risk factors for 30-day hospital readmission among general surgery patients. J Am Coll Surg 215:322–330PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wu WC, Trivedi A, Friedmann PD, Henderson WG, Smith TS, Poses RM, Uttley G, Vezeridis M, Eaton CB, Mor V (2012) Association between hospital intraoperative blood transfusion practices for surgical blood loss and hospital surgical mortality rates. Ann Surg 255:708–714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stowers M, Lemanu DP, Coleman B, Hill AG, Munro JT (2014) Review article: perioperative care in enhanced recovery for total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 22:383–392Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Artinyan A, Nunoo-Mensah JW, Balasubramaniam S, Gauderman J, Essani R, Gonzalez-Ruiz C, Kaiser AM, Beart RW Jr (2008) Prolonged postoperative ileus-definition, risk factors, and predictors after surgery. World J Surg 32:1495–1500CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    He X, Chen Z, Huang J, Lian L, Rouniyar S, Wu X, Lan P (2014) Stapled side-to-side anastomosis might be better than handsewn end-to-end anastomosis in ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 59:1544–1551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Guo Z, Li Y, Zhu W, Gong J, Li N, Li J (2013) Comparing outcomes between side-to-side anastomosis and other anastomotic configurations after intestinal resection for patients with Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis. World J Surg 37:893–901CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kyzer S, Gordon PH (1992) The stapled functional end-to-end anastomosis following colonic resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 7:125–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yamamoto T, Keighley MR (1999) Stapled functional end-to-end anastomosis in Crohn’s disease. Surg Today 29:679–681CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Clawson DK (1953) Side-to-side intestinal anastomosis complicated by ulceration, dilatation, and anemia: a physiologically unsound procedure; review of the literature and presentation of a case. Surgery 34:254–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ackland TH (1961) Complications and dangers of side-to-side intestinal anastomosis. ANZ J Surg 30:265–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Abbruzzese AA, Curtis LE (1966) Chronic blood loss as a late complication of side-to-side small bowel anastomosis. Gastroenterology 51:399–402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Adachi Y, Matsushima T, Mori M, Sugimachi K, Oiwa T (1993) Blind loop syndrome: multiple ileal ulcers following side-to-side anastomosis. Pathology 25:402–404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lennert KA (1979) The small-intestine-stasis syndrome following side-to-side anastomosis. Chirurg 50:21–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Walfish J, Frankel A (1979) Chronic pseudo-obstruction secondary to side-to-side intestinal anastomosis. Arch Surg 114:1075–1078CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moon SB, Park KJ, Moon JS, Choe EK, So IS, Jung SE (2011) Migrating motor complex changes after side-to-side ileal bypass in mouse ileum ex vivo: mechanism underlying the blind loop syndrome? J Korean Surg Soc 80:251–259PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nygren J, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O (2001) Preoperative oral carbohydrate nutrition: an update. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 4:255–259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rahbari NN, Zimmermann JB, Schmidt T, Koch M, Weigand MA, Weitz J (2009) Meta-analysis of standard, restrictive and supplemental fluid administration in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 96:331–341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zingg U, Miskovic D, Hamel CT, Erni L, Oertli D, Metzger U (2009) Influence of thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative pain relief and ileus after laparoscopic colorectal resection: benefit with epidural analgesia. Surg Endosc 23:276–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Slim K, Vicaut E, Launay-Savary MV, Contant C, Chipponi J (2009) Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on the role of mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 249:203–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Liberman AS, Soop M, Hill A, Kennedy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O (2012) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 31:783–800CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Collin A, Jung B, Nilsson E, Pahlman L, Folkesson J (2014) Impact of mechanical bowel preparation on survival after colonic cancer resection. Br J Surg 101:1594–1600CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heung-Kwon Oh
    • 1
  • Myong Hun Ihn
    • 1
  • Il Tae Son
    • 1
  • Jin Taek Park
    • 1
  • Jaebong Lee
    • 2
  • Duck-Woo Kim
    • 1
  • Sung-Bum Kang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of MedicineSeoul National University Bundang HospitalSeongnam-siRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Division of Statistics, Medical Research Collaborating CenterSeoul National University Bundang HospitalSeongnamRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations